Exercise points
beccadawn50
Posts: 1 Member
My exercise points are way too high and is incorrect. Is there a way to fix this?
0
Replies
-
Do you mean the extra calories? You can manually edit them to any number besides 0.0
-
Just eat back 50% of what they gave you1
-
Just out in your own numbers. I always choose random ones for fun
0 -
AliNouveau wrote: »Just out in your own numbers. I always choose random ones for fun
watching TV 20,000 calories burned. I've got some eating to do!1 -
-
AliNouveau wrote: »Just out in your own numbers. I always choose random ones for fun
watching TV 20,000 calories burned. I've got some eating to do!
Good man.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
JerSchmare wrote: »middlehaitch wrote: »
I just don't understand this. But, whatever.
The approach I've always taken is eat 100% and monitor the results. If you gain or maintain, knock them down a little.
Everything should be a 'watch and see' situation. Use the scientific method because it really works. Change one variable, keep it up for 4 to 6 weeks. If you don't get the results you want, change another variable. It's never ending though because you might change your exercise routine, or your eating patterns, or play with TDEE vs NEAT. Or you might try intermittent fasting. It's fun to evaluate how different things affect weight loss and energy throughout the day.
The most important things are lots of water, sleep, manage stress, and eat fewer calories than you burn. Everything else is circumstantial.
I always ate back 100% too. But that was when there was just the MFP or on line calculators. MFP's numbers worked well for me and my activities.
I used to also just say eat back your exercise calories and adjust.
However, after years of posting on here, and the ploriferation of personal tracking devices, I have found there is a much wider discrepancy in results, and people just starting out are more likely to quit if they are struggling to get results.
Saying eat back 50 or 75% (which is what I usually say) gives them the same 'adjust to suit' option, but with a different starting point.
Cheers, h.0 -
I have been paying more attention to my exercise calories awarded vs how much I eat back and I find that if MFP award me *say* 500 calories for 60 minutes of Body Combat, I may reduce it to 450. Then reduce my next 60 minute workout by 50, too. Strength Training I usually have to reduce to 275 calories or less per 60 minutes unless it's a faster class like Body pump.
Basically, adjusting down each hour of exercise by 50 or so calories (depending on how many were awarded, of course) typically means I can eat back 75% to 100% of calories and still lose 1lb to about 1.8lbs per week. I think I had maybe 2 weeks where I stalled a bit at .75lbs... but I just adjusted what I ate back by a small percentage.0 -
AliNouveau wrote: »Just out in your own numbers. I always choose random ones for fun
watching TV 20,000 calories burned. I've got some eating to do!
Man I gotta start watching tv More1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 428 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions