Overweight people being charged more for insurance

Options
When I decided to lose weight I found out my insurance didn't pay for anything regarding weight loss. Not even a nutritionalist. It made me wonder if they would rather have you sick? Wouldn't be more cost effective to help people loss weight before they started to have health problems? Or, to help them get off medications for high blood pressure or diabetes, etc. Yes, I understand that for the most part being overweight/obese is our doing.
But, the doctors/insurance industry should help. Food is an addiction just like drugs, smoking, etc.
I don't have any major issues with being obese. My cholesterol is a little high but not enough for the need for medication. Overweight/obese doesn't necessarily mean a lot of medical issues. There's no way to determine what medical issues you may have regardless of how overweight or how healthy.
For example, not everyone that has diabetes is overweight. I'm overweight and diabetes runs in my family but I don't have it. I consider myself lucky.

«1

Replies

  • fuzzylop72
    fuzzylop72 Posts: 651 Member
    Options
    I think some insurance companies will pay for a dietition if your bmi is larger than a certain value. I suspect the reason some don't is weight loss services don't necessarily have a great long term success rate.
  • VintageFeline
    VintageFeline Posts: 6,771 Member
    Options
    There's another pages long discussion of this just a few threads down.......
  • fuzzylop72
    fuzzylop72 Posts: 651 Member
    Options
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    Would you expect insurance to pay you to stop speeding? Or send a speed limit counselor? Desired behavior results in rewards. No one is going to preemptively reward you for good behavior - at least no successful business would.

    If weight causes health issues which result in larger insurance claims, then I'd expect insurance companies to pay for weight loss in many cases -- and in many cases, they do. Example policies from one state:

    http://www.mddhelp.com/insurance.html

    Many will only pay if your bmi is at a high-risk level (obese class 2 or 3, for example), though.
  • candoit05
    candoit05 Posts: 11 Member
    Options
    @csardiver "Would you expect insurance to pay you to stop speeding? Or send a speed limit counselor? Desired behavior results in rewards. No one is going to preemptively reward you for good behavior - at least no successful business would."

    They do have driver education. So your point?
    People do drugs and they have rehab. Insurance pays for substance abuse. It was their choice to do drugs. (I'm not saying that they shouldn't be able to get help)
    As, far as a business preemptively rewarding. That is not I was saying. Most people have illnesses from being overweight. Or, are close to having diabetes for example. It's a known fact by losing weight will prevent diabetes or allow somene to get off medications for diabetes and blood pressure.
    Some do reward, there was another member stating their company gives out gift cards. Some insurance companies will pay or give you a discount on a gym membership. Some insurance companies will pay for a nutritionist.
    What? "No successful business would"

    People are overweight for various reasons.
    You don't know what is causing the person to be overweight. So just leave your judgemental comments out. I think most people know that being overweight causes a variety of problems. Nobody is lying to themselves. My point was not
    everyone is the same.

    If you can't see the bigger picture that prevention is more cost effective then treating several illnesses then maybe you should educate yourself. I'm sure the insurance industry is aware of the cost effectiveness. But, just like most things, it doesn't work like it should. Insurance companies are in business to make money.
    My point of the post is if someone reaches out for help it would be great for the insurance company to provide the service. I am paying for it. Maybe, people need help with what and how much to eat. Maybe, some people need
    counseling for underlying causes.
    There's no predetermination of what illness someone may get. Someone that is healthy can get Cancer. Some people smoke for all their lives but don't get lung cancer. Some people exercise regularly and have a heart attack. You can't single out a group of people and charge them more for insurance.
  • candoit05
    candoit05 Posts: 11 Member
    Options
    @sijomiial.
    So if the do an DNA test on you and find out you have genes that will cause you to be predisposed to certain diseases should they charge you more? Where is the cut off to who and how much insurance can charge?
    If they are interested in their profit margin then
    they would help people get and stay healthy instead of throwing pills at everything. Yeah the insurance companies and pharmaceuticals are making plenty of profits.

    I have been mostly healthy for most of my life.
    At almost 45 years, I'm only on one medication. Blood pressure and blood sugar good. There are people who are overweight and can run 10 miles and there are people who are skinny that can't run a mile. So, let's put some of these "healthy people" on a treadmill and see how far they can run? Size doesn't equate to healthy.

    Also, there's nothing wrong with my mindset. I'm doing just fine in my journey. I was giving examples of why people are overweight from a perspective you obviously don't know anything about. It's easy to judge if you haven't been there.
    You picked out one thing from what I said instead of addressing why insurance companies will pay for one treatment and not another? Even though they are both choices that people make. Why insurance companies seem to keep people from becoming healthy? By not giving them the tools they need to succeed.
    I read that we are the one county that has the most overweight/obese people. Yes, it starts with the person taking responsibility, but the doctors/insurance companies also need to play a role.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,811 Member
    Options
    Still missing the point - it's a business not a charitable foundation.
    Don't like the way they do business, then take your money elsewhere. They are offering a service, you as the customer decide if the price is worth it.
    They can charge whatever they like but as a business they need to be competitive or they lose customers. Vote with your feet if you don't like the price/cover on offer.

    Differential pricing based on known risk models is entirely sensible. It's generally fair but not universally so to every individual.
    So when I set up my own business I went shopping for health cover but got hit by complete spinal exclusion clauses due to my history, they would be happy to take my money but if my back went out I wasn't covered.
    From their perspective - sensible business. From mine - unfair as I managed my injuries well enough to continue working and no surgery required to date.
    So I engaged directly with the underwriters to negotiate a personal not general deal based on my specific history rather than a generic risk model. They came up with a price, I decided if I thought the cover was worth the price.
    Can apply the same to using BMI - fair for the majority, unfair for minority like me who for most of their life have been fitter than most, healthier than most but over the BMI normal category for weight.
    Life isn't fair and the expectation that it is really isn't helpful or realistic.

    They pay for one treatment but not another based on cost/return. Get someone back to work quicker, reduce size of the claim... Clearly they don't share your belief that providing the education or support you wish for is cost effective.

    In my country N.I.C.E. (National Institute for Healthcare and Excellence) despite their name make exactly the same value judgements and it's not even a for profit environment. New, very effective but dreadfully expensive new wonder drug that gives terminally ill a few more months isn't going to get funding.

    Some insurance providers give incentives for healthy behaviours though, discounts on gym memberships etc. But there's also the incentive if that you change from being a high risk category (smoker, overweight...) then you pay less next renewal. That's if financial incentive is actually a significant driver for an individual....

    PS - you have posted in the Debate forum, don't expect that everyone will share your views or you will be very disappointed!

    PPS - of course I judge you based on what you write. Just as you have judged me and leaped to a conclusion.
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    Options
    I think some insurance companies will pay for a dietition if your bmi is larger than a certain value. I suspect the reason some don't is weight loss services don't necessarily have a great long term success rate.

    They also were a huge scam in the 1970s with things like Club Med originally being a weight loss "resort" where insurance companies paid the bill.
  • Geocitiesuser
    Geocitiesuser Posts: 1,429 Member
    Options
    Just a by the by, all of my health plans available all include some sort of incentive for gym memberships. Either a discount, a reimbursement, or outright free membership to various gyms.

    With modern insurance plans obese people DO end up paying more, because deductibles/spend downs are sky high.... I rarely need to go to the doctor, so spend very little on health costs. Just check ups and the occasional ailment. Insurance is there if I get "really" sick.
  • comptonelizabeth
    comptonelizabeth Posts: 1,701 Member
    Options
    As someone has already mentioned,even here in the UK where healthcare is free at the point of delivery,treatment can be withheld/postponed until the patient changes their behaviour (stops drinking/smoking/overeating) I suffer from a chronic health condition and have funding for an expensive medication. To get funding agreed I had to be assessed for lifestyle (smoking,alcohol,diet,compliance with other treatments ) There is help and support available for quitting smoking and drinking and for weight loss,however.
    The only private health insurance I have is for when I travel and I have found most insurers won't cover me for existing conditions. My illness is not caused by anything I have knowingly done so I'd be pretty peeved to find that things like obesity were disregarded.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,622 Member
    Options
    It's insurance. All have differences. You make the choice on who to get. Realize that insurance is in the business of making money like anyone else and there's no guarantee that an obese person will lose weight or for that matter keep it off and look to insurance again to pay for another attempt at it.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • candoit05
    candoit05 Posts: 11 Member
    Options
    @ninerbuff
    Actually, I don't get much choice on who I get for insurance. My choice is what my employer provides. Which I pay premiums. Yes, there's no guarantee but if half of the people were successful at keeping it off then that would be a start. Also, if the parents are obese the kids are usually obese. At least, that is what I have noticed. Which means another generation of obese people. Obesity really has become an epidemic. Just a side note. I didn't have a weight issue until I got older.

    Yes, insurance is a business and will always make money. There are plenty of sick people. But, if they did a little more to help people get healthy then they would make less money. Most times they just want to throw pills at you instead of addressing the issue. Hence, is why I say insurance companies/doctors are just in it to make money. Yes, there are times and ailments for which people do need the medication.
    Sometimes even running unnecessary test.
    I'm not saying all Dr's are like this, but from my personal experience I dealt with this.
    I've seen a few good Dr's that actually listen to what you are saying.
    They have programs for drug addiction but there's no guarantee that they won't do drugs again. So what's the difference?
  • candoit05
    candoit05 Posts: 11 Member
    Options
    @sijomial
    No, you are missing the point. Yeah, we all know they are a business. They make millions of dollars. Yes, insurance group plans are based on risk models. Now, your going into getting and individual plan for yourself verses what I have which is a insurance plan through my employer. I don't have any say in. There's no walking away. You got to negotiate your plan. You can't compare the two. That's two different things.
    Not all insurance has incentives. ( I wish)
    You were making judgments "As, being fitter than most", as you said, you don't know what it's like being overweight. Also, your BMI is over the chart for being healthy because you probably have a lot of muscle. The BMI charts are not realistic. It doesn't account for you are muscular. According, to that chart I should be 110. I would look sick if I was at that weight.

    I don't expect everyone to agree with me. But, if we are to have a discussion then address the statements and not pick out one thing and judge me on that.
    PS. What country do you live in?
    Off to the gym.....
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,811 Member
    Options
    candoit05 wrote: »
    @sijomial
    No, you are missing the point. Yeah, we all know they are a business. They make millions of dollars. Yes, insurance group plans are based on risk models. Now, your going into getting and individual plan for yourself verses what I have which is a insurance plan through my employer. I don't have any say in. There's no walking away. You got to negotiate your plan. You can't compare the two. That's two different things.
    Not all insurance has incentives. ( I wish)
    You were making judgments "As, being fitter than most", as you said, you don't know what it's like being overweight. Also, your BMI is over the chart for being healthy because you probably have a lot of muscle. The BMI charts are not realistic. It doesn't account for you are muscular. According, to that chart I should be 110. I would look sick if I was at that weight.

    I don't expect everyone to agree with me. But, if we are to have a discussion then address the statements and not pick out one thing and judge me on that.
    PS. What country do you live in?
    Off to the gym.....
    You have judged me and made a huge assumption. I came to MyFitnessPal because I was fat, I stayed because of the fitness side.

    I was fat for 20 years before I ditched the excuses and lost the excess weight.
    A bit of victim mentality if you like, I blamed the car driver who mangled my knee for making me fat (true to a degree). But he didn't make me eat too much for twenty years - that was my fault. Quite embarrassing really!
    Maybe others can avoid the mistake I made of not taking responsibility for their own weight?

    After my injury I was just plain fat. Maybe the support/counselling you suggest could have helped me sort out my head much earlier but really I don't see it was the insurance company's responsibility at all. They helped me through the operation and rehab phase but when I resumed work I regarded it as being all on me. That is why my employer at the time subsidised (to a degree) private health cover - to minimise the time being unable to work.

    Got my fitness back and stayed fit (but still fat) through hard work in the gym and the squash court - it wasn't given to me on a plate. Yes I probably have more muscle than most old farts - again I've earned it. One of those personal responsibility choices again, TV or gym...

    The BMI charts are actually pretty good guide for the vast majority of people - yes I also used the excuse for a long time "I've got some muscle, BMI doesn't apply to me". My current best weight is actually right on the cusp of normal/overweight.

    (I'm in the UK.)
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    candoit05 wrote: »
    what I have which is a insurance plan through my employer. I don't have any say in. There's no walking away.

    You don't have to use your employer plan. For example, I have a co-worker who does not, because her husband is a police officer and she's better off on his family plan. (I happen to agree that it would be better to have insurance less tied to work, but the reason we don't have that is that for most people employer-based insurance is better than having to get it on your own (especially BECAUSE of such things as pre-existing conditions which you could avoid any problems with by having employer-based even before the law changed (and before whatever may happen next).
    The BMI charts are not realistic. It doesn't account for you are muscular. According, to that chart I should be 110. I would look sick if I was at that weight.

    This does not make sense, there is no one right weight with BMI. For example, the healthy weight range for me is something like 105 to 140.

    If weight loss treatment makes a difference to future costs, the insurance companies would be sensible to pay for it (I believe this is why wellness programs are promoted). Right now, I think there's a genuine, reasonable debate as to whether weight loss treatment makes a difference. Personally, I lost a bunch of weight without it, and don't see why it would have been particularly helpful. Better to figure it out on your own, since it's essentially personal behavioral changes, IMO.
  • MKEgal
    MKEgal Posts: 3,250 Member
    Options
    "Food is an addiction just like drugs, smoking, etc."

    No.
    Food is a necessity.
    Alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs are choices.

    Using any of them to try to ignore / cope with feelings will not turn out well,
    but food is the one we must have, so is the hardest to get under control -
    can't "just say no" or stop eating, right?
    And the stuff that's bad for us (lots of fat / sugar / salt) tastes the best.
  • richardgavel
    richardgavel Posts: 1,001 Member
    Options
    Unfortunately for most businesses, it simply easier to raise costs to the customer as opposed to reduce expenses. Especially when the former will maintain profits and the latter MIGHT. Add to that the lack of competition created by the fact that most health insurance is employer provides, and so goes mostly unseen by the consumer. I'd love the ability to get a raise for my employer not to purchase health insurance and then get the same tax benefit they do. That would be a real implementation of free market principles.
  • Old_Cat_Lady
    Old_Cat_Lady Posts: 1,193 Member
    Options
    Companies not hire fat people. My company pays 50% of my health insurance cost.