Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Too fat to adopt a child
Replies
-
richardgavel wrote: »It's one thing to call it an automatic disqualifier, but I don't have a problem with the idea that it's something that would go in the minus column in terms of evaluation. And in terms of being told to lose weight to adopt, I would imagine that is probably of of the minus evaluation points that can be changed the quickest anyway.
I would be fine if being over a certain BMI required the parents to submit full physicals and get sign off from a medical professional5 -
Carlos_421 wrote: »What's worse for a kid?
Having fat parents or having no parents?
What's worse?
Having drug addicted parents or no parents?
Having felon parents or no parents?
Having chronically ill parents or no parents?
I'm not saying you should have to be perfectly fit and thin to adopt. But there must be a line somewhere that the health of the child is in danger.
My mom was fat, drug addicted, chronically ill, and, had law enforcement been able to detect her drug crimes, a felon, though never charged.
She taught me to avoid drugs and doctors, and how to cook.
All in all, considering how I and my siblings turned out, having a fat, drug addicted, chronically ill, felonious parent is better than no parent.10 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »skymningen wrote: »Carlos_421 wrote: »
Fat =\= drug addicted
Fat =\= felons
Fat =\= chronically ill
1) What about food addicted? There are very similar biochemical 'reward' reactions for people with eating disorders after a binge than for drug addicts after a fix or gaming addicts after gaining a level.
The obvious problem with drug addicted parents is that they are likely to neglect or even abuse the child or to be unable to provide a safe environment. On the other hand, being a smoker does not make one a bad parent, and neither would so called food addiction (probably "eating addiction" is a better term).2) No. Sure. Nobody said that.
Yes, the clear point was to equate the two situations. Among other things, having felons as parents could be problematic as being in prison makes it hard to parent. Former, rehabilitated felon who served his time? (Or prior felon of many stupid sorts: I had a friend who had to get a criminal record expunged to be a lawyer as he'd stolen a mailbox when drunk in college.)
With respect to someone who had been to prison for a felony, I understand why they'd have strikes against them in the adoption line, but I think they could be perfectly good parents.3) As @jdlobb said, debatable.
One can be fat and not chronically ill. One can be chronically ill and not fat.
You need to be able to provide a stable home. If you are so fat that you cannot do so or do the things parents do, yes, sure, that's a problem. Being in an obese BMI doesn't mean that's the case.
Completely agree. Thanks for typing it out so that I didn't have to.
3 -
This forum gets its hackles up over BMI far too easily. No, it's not a perfect measure, but it is the best there is. For the overwhelming majority of people it is an incredibly reliable predictor of weight problems. The people it doesn't work for are statistical outliers, not at all the norm.
Actually, no it is not all there is. Body composition tests anyone? BMI was created as a way to track obesity in a large population. The statistician who created it (in the 1800s) even said it cannot and should not be used at an individual level.
3 -
I adopted my children as babies.
(I'm in the U.K. so my experience reflects that...)
You need to keep in mind it's primarily about the child and not about the parents.
There's a whole load of selection criteria for parents to meet to even get on the waiting list - current health plus attempting to predict the future health and longevity of prospective adoptive parents is just a small part of that. It's to try as much as possible to ensure the child has a loving and stable family through to adulthood.
Being overweight is clearly a risk factor, one of many risk factors. BMI isn't the best way to look at overall health but let's face it you don't need BMI to know someone 50kg overweight has a serious health problem right now and good prospects of a shortened life span.
Adoption agencies can afford to be choosy - there's no shortage of parents wanting to adopt.
Yes that's tough on the parents who get rejected but it's about the child's needs and not not the parent's needs or wants.
Adopt Change CEO Renée Carter said some of the barriers to adoption, such as BMI but also age and length of marriage, were just “bizarre”.
This comment is ridiculous!
Of course age is a factor in not just longevity of the parents but also in providing the best match for the child.
Length of marriage (or other relationship) is a sensible thing to take into account - adopting a child is an even longer term commitment.
So, in the U.K. there are no kids languishing in foster care or orphanages because there are so many parents waiting? It's definitely not like that in the US with several 100,000 waiting for permanent homes. Many will age out of the system without ever being adopted.
We both agree that BMI isn't the best measure of overall health, and I'm not sure where their cut off is--is it overweight or obese? The discussion jumped to morbidly obese which typically does increase co-morbidity factors, but a couple of examples in the article made it seem like even being a little overweight ruled people out.
What if parents gain weight, are they going to take children away? From just adoptive parents?2 -
I adopted my children as babies.
(I'm in the U.K. so my experience reflects that...)
You need to keep in mind it's primarily about the child and not about the parents.
There's a whole load of selection criteria for parents to meet to even get on the waiting list - current health plus attempting to predict the future health and longevity of prospective adoptive parents is just a small part of that. It's to try as much as possible to ensure the child has a loving and stable family through to adulthood.
Being overweight is clearly a risk factor, one of many risk factors. BMI isn't the best way to look at overall health but let's face it you don't need BMI to know someone 50kg overweight has a serious health problem right now and good prospects of a shortened life span.
Adoption agencies can afford to be choosy - there's no shortage of parents wanting to adopt.
Yes that's tough on the parents who get rejected but it's about the child's needs and not not the parent's needs or wants.
Adopt Change CEO Renée Carter said some of the barriers to adoption, such as BMI but also age and length of marriage, were just “bizarre”.
This comment is ridiculous!
Of course age is a factor in not just longevity of the parents but also in providing the best match for the child.
Length of marriage (or other relationship) is a sensible thing to take into account - adopting a child is an even longer term commitment.
So, in the U.K. there are no kids languishing in foster care or orphanages because there are so many parents waiting? It's definitely not like that in the US with several 100,000 waiting for permanent homes. Many will age out of the system without ever being adopted.
We both agree that BMI isn't the best measure of overall health, and I'm not sure where their cut off is--is it overweight or obese? The discussion jumped to morbidly obese which typically does increase co-morbidity factors, but a couple of examples in the article made it seem like even being a little overweight ruled people out.
What if parents gain weight, are they going to take children away? From just adoptive parents?
My friend had to get to a healthy BMI from an "overweight" one before they were allowed to adopt.0 -
I wasn't aware of these restrictions. My cousin's wife is obese and they have adopted 3 older kids from the foster system. She is heavy, but she's very active, involved in her kid's lives, and is a great mom. She's not the best role model for fitness and health, but the kids absolutely love her and they are well taken care of. It would have been a total waste if they had been denied and those adorable kids were still rolling around in the system.
I can see limiting obese people to a point, but only in extreme cases. Some super morbidly obese persons might not make the best parents simply because many of them are incapable of taking care of themselves, let alone children. (Thinking of the bed-ridden people, and those with so many health problems they aren't expected to live much longer.) You want to set kids up in stable, healthy families that are able to care for kids long-term...2 -
Just my two cents here...I'm a psychologist and previously worked with children in foster care providing trauma therapy. The majority of the children were placed in non-familial homes with other children being fostered. I don't feel that BMI correlates with healthy parenting. Not one bit. Now, if a person wanted to adopt a child with a BMI that was high AND had severe health issues caused by morbid obesity, than they might not be an appropriate candidate to adopt as their healthcare issues might impact their ability to take care of a child long-term. More than anything, I'd love to see children placed with blood relatives but that just doesn't happen all the time. And yes, foster parents are typically supposed to be temporary until parents get their act together. Sadly, that doesn't always happen and children stay in foster until they reach adult age and transition.1
-
I adopted my children as babies.
(I'm in the U.K. so my experience reflects that...)
You need to keep in mind it's primarily about the child and not about the parents.
There's a whole load of selection criteria for parents to meet to even get on the waiting list - current health plus attempting to predict the future health and longevity of prospective adoptive parents is just a small part of that. It's to try as much as possible to ensure the child has a loving and stable family through to adulthood.
Being overweight is clearly a risk factor, one of many risk factors. BMI isn't the best way to look at overall health but let's face it you don't need BMI to know someone 50kg overweight has a serious health problem right now and good prospects of a shortened life span.
Adoption agencies can afford to be choosy - there's no shortage of parents wanting to adopt.
Yes that's tough on the parents who get rejected but it's about the child's needs and not not the parent's needs or wants.
Adopt Change CEO Renée Carter said some of the barriers to adoption, such as BMI but also age and length of marriage, were just “bizarre”.
This comment is ridiculous!
Of course age is a factor in not just longevity of the parents but also in providing the best match for the child.
Length of marriage (or other relationship) is a sensible thing to take into account - adopting a child is an even longer term commitment.
So, in the U.K. there are no kids languishing in foster care or orphanages because there are so many parents waiting? It's definitely not like that in the US with several 100,000 waiting for permanent homes. Many will age out of the system without ever being adopted.
We both agree that BMI isn't the best measure of overall health, and I'm not sure where their cut off is--is it overweight or obese? The discussion jumped to morbidly obese which typically does increase co-morbidity factors, but a couple of examples in the article made it seem like even being a little overweight ruled people out.
What if parents gain weight, are they going to take children away? From just adoptive parents?
@Psychgrrl
Not sure why you feel the need to put words into my mouth? If you want to ask me a question then ask it in non aggressive manner and I'll happily respond and share my experience as someone who has gone through the process.
Once you have adopted legally the children are yours - they can only be taken away under the same circumstances as if they were your biological children, they have exactly the same status. The adoption agency's job and involvement is complete unless some ongoing contact with the birth parents is agreed.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
Calm the *kitten* down, people.
Here is the study from the Adopt Change website:
https://engonetac.blob.core.windows.net/assets/uploads/files/Barriers_research_2017.pdf
I quote:
"The findings of this study suggest that personal factors do not generally
pose a major obstacle to adoption for the majority of survey respondents.
Less than 7 per cent of respondents indicate that health issues had
prevented them from being eligible to adopt."2 -
Again showing the absurdity that some unaccountable bureaucrat in a government agency can make a decision based upon one metric. There must be a holistic review of a couple to be a best fit between the children and parents.
Is having overweight parents worse than being a ward of the state?
I was adopted in the US in 1971 - no idea if this rule was in place or anything similar. All I know is that I was doubly blessed - with biological parents who realized that taking care of a child was above and beyond their current ability and with my real parents who opened up their home to a child and loved me as their own.3 -
This forum gets its hackles up over BMI far too easily. No, it's not a perfect measure, but it is the best there is. For the overwhelming majority of people it is an incredibly reliable predictor of weight problems. The people it doesn't work for are statistical outliers, not at all the norm.
Actually, no it is not all there is. Body composition tests anyone? BMI was created as a way to track obesity in a large population. The statistician who created it (in the 1800s) even said it cannot and should not be used at an individual level.
actually "The concept of BMI - a simple ratio of weight in relation to height, was the work of a Belgian statistician, Adolphe Quetelet who published his "Quetelet Index" in 1832. It is important to emphasise that Quetelet had no interest in studying obesity when he developed this index."
http://www.cutthewaist.com/bmi.html
It does go on to say it is limited but again those are statistical outliers..0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions