A bit frustrated!
francescr
Posts: 2 Member
I have a Garmin Vivofit 2 and when I walk on my treadmill, yes I live in CNY and sometimes it's to cold to walk outside, it tells me the calories I have I burned, which is totally different from what the treadmill tells me and different than what MFP says! Who is telling me the truth? I have decided to not believe any of them, I don't eat the few calories I burn anyway! I have made the right decision correct?
0
Replies
-
0
-
It would help if you tell us how many calories each gives you. You do need to fuel your workout so take the lowest number, or half of the lowest number.1
-
I have a Garmin Vivofit 2 and when I walk on my treadmill, yes I live in CNY and sometimes it's to cold to walk outside, it tells me the calories I have I burned, which is totally different from what the treadmill tells me and different than what MFP says! Who is telling me the truth? I have decided to not believe any of them, I don't eat the few calories I burn anyway! I have made the right decision correct?
They each user a different method of estimating.
The VivoFit counts steps, make an assumption about pace length to calculate a total distance and applies your bodyweight to that to come up with an estimate.
The dreadmill measure the distance that the belt had traveled, then applies your bodyweight to that.
MFP uses a time and place to estimate a distance and uses your bodyweight, corrected by an equivalence scaling factor.
Inevitably they'll be different. Use one, and stick with it, and correct as required friending on your progress.
As far as eating back is concerned, generally that's how MFP is supposed to support you, you should replenish some of what you expend. If you're walking that's unlikely to be significant, personally I only burn c50 cals/ mile, so it's unlikely to be a significant issue.0 -
Add a heart rate monitor for a little more accuracy.1
-
I would use the vivofit as that is the one that has access to the most comprehensive dataset about you. Treadmill knows how far you've gone, but doesn't know your weight (unless you tell it) or your stride length. MFP knows your weight and your time spent exercising, but just applies a standard formula based on an approximation of effort.
If you want exacts though, it would need to be an HRM0 -
tiny_clanger wrote: »
If you want exacts though, it would need to be an HRM
Not at a walking pace. The equivalence breaks down at low intensities.0 -
The Mammal is right. HR works reasonably well only for sustained efforts with significantly elevated HR.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions