1,200 Calories

What would you guys recommend for a 1,200 calorie a day diet for weight loss.
Breakfast Lunch and dinner etc.
«1

Replies

  • Unknown
    edited November 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • PowerliftingMom
    PowerliftingMom Posts: 430 Member
    No, that's really not enough for a woman to eat :-1:
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    I eat more than 1600 a day and have lost weight doing so and Im female. 1200 is the MINIMUM for women,
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    filbo132 wrote: »
    *kitten* me and that 1200 calories crap...seriously...I also blame mfp for pushing 1200 calories crap to most women.

    1200 is the MINIMUM that a female should take in if they are very short,sedentary,elderly or a combo of the 3. most women can get away with more calories but some think they cant lose weight unless they eat the minimum or think thats what you need to lose weight,while many also will eat the lowest they can to lose as fast as they can not knowing the repercussions of eating so little.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    Since it appears no one looked, the OP is actually a female. She just has a different profile pic.


    OP, 1200 may or may not be right for you it would just depend on what your stats are and your workout plan. If you are not very overweight or active, you'd want to consume more calories.

    But in response to your main question, you should look at a lot of volume foods; lean proteins, low sugar fruits, low GI veggies.
  • Unknown
    edited November 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Most women who are average height or less (or even higher than average if not obese) get 1200 if they choose 2 lb and sedentary (as their maintenance is not more than 2200 when sedentary). Most of these women are not sedentary and in any case should not be regularly eating 1200 as they should be eating exercise calories.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited November 2017
    OP, if 1200 is right for you, it really depends on how you like to distribute your calories. I did 1250 for a while (until I realized it was too low -- I was losing about 3 lb/week), and ate around 300 cal at breakfast (2 egg omelet with lots of vegetables), around 400 at lunch (often a big salad with protein on it, maybe with some fruit or greek yogurt or cottage cheese), and a 550 cal dinner (lean meat, lots and lots of vegetables, starchy side). I varied this so it would not get boring, but I think realizing I had more calories to play with in reality really helped me not get into a rut.
  • LiveLoveFitFab
    LiveLoveFitFab Posts: 302 Member
    My recommendation before exercise is 1,280. That's a lb a week. I'm still "overweight" by the WHO BMI scale, so a lb a week is a good rate of loss. Most days I exercise and eat 1,500, but I can't work out seven days a week.

    And it must be fine. 85 days in, 18lbs lost. Energy is great. My mood is wonderful. I don't feel deprived. Rate of loss is appropriate. I've got all my hair. My skin is healthy.

    Anyways, if you are going to eat for one lb of fat loss a week or more, please heed this advice- You must eat nutritionally dense food to avoid not meeting your nutritional goals. You have less calories to get your nutrients with, so don't go and blow all those calories on cake and ice cream and then wonder why you feel cruddy after a few weeks.



  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    edited November 2017
    psuLemon wrote: »
    Since it appears no one looked, the OP is actually a female. She just has a different profile pic.


    OP, 1200 may or may not be right for you it would just depend on what your stats are and your workout plan. If you are not very overweight or active, you'd want to consume more calories.

    But in response to your main question, you should look at a lot of volume foods; lean proteins, low sugar fruits, low GI veggies.

    last time I looked I could have sworn it stated male but if female I agree on it may be ok depending on stats
  • rheddmobile
    rheddmobile Posts: 6,840 Member
    1200 is a very uncomfortable number of calories to eat - but if you do even a modest amount of exercise you can earn 400 calories which will make life much better. Even at 1600 you need to mostly eat nutrition dense food, or you won't meet your nutritional needs. I also take an iron supplement, as I was becoming anemic.

    1200 is three 400 calorie meals, or 1 larger meal, a tiny meal, and a snack.

    1600 will get you two full sized 500 calorie meals, a smaller meal, and a snack. Everyone is different but I prefer to eat a big 500 calorie breakfast, a reasonable 500 calorie lunch, a couple of hundred calories of snacks, and a very small dinner. You can just absolutely pig out on 500 calories for breakfast - yesterday I had steel cut oats with milk, walnuts, and apples, two eggs, two slices of bacon, and some cottage cheese. 500 calories of lunch or dinner looks like about 300 calories of protein and fat, plus 200 of vegetables. The protein might be a chicken thigh, small tenderloin steak, several slices of pork loin, or a fillet of fish. Plus half a cup of legumes and some green vegetables.
  • marygraci999
    marygraci999 Posts: 1,917 Member
    Mine is 1700..
  • EsmeMary101
    EsmeMary101 Posts: 154 Member
    I've been on 1200 since last March. I usually manage between 1100 and 1300. It's not easy but it is doable. If u send me a friend request ull see my diary.
  • rhiawiz57
    rhiawiz57 Posts: 906 Member
    edited November 2017
    such strong bashing of the 1200 cal a day diet. i tried 1400 a day for months and didn't lose any weight, and once i went to 1200 i could lose 1-2 lbs a week. annnnd i weigh my food on a digital kitchen scale, and with measuring cups and spoons! sorry i am not as cool as all of you who can lose at 1600. haha not seriously knocking ya, if you can eat THAT much and lose, great! just not all of us can!! just sucks when the OP has a legit question and everyone says she's not eating enough. she may be eating enough for her, no, 1200 isn't maintenance for most unless they are very petite/older, but it might be required for loss for many women. and i don't find it to be uncomfortable either.

    that being said - on average, i eat three 350 cal meals and have a protein shake or bar as a snack for my 1200. after the first 2 weeks, my appetite shrunk and i'm not having problems. on days i work out, i can add another 200-300 cals, but with injuries i haven't worked out much.
  • rhiawiz57
    rhiawiz57 Posts: 906 Member
    edited November 2017
    i was being snarky...for sure. i just hate all the attacks on 1200 when it works well for some people. and my logging and measuring is better now than it was a year ago, for sure. however, i am indeed at 1200 now and if i creep up over 1300 even with my improved food measuring and weighing discipline, i really don't lose weight for weeks at a time. it's going really well and i don't know why i would add more cals until after my injury heals and i genuinely work out more! that's why for me 1200 seems to be the magic number.
  • TheAFKPro
    TheAFKPro Posts: 7 Member
    I do agree that 1,200 has lead me to eat random snacks or if someone offers something I usually accept, I was on 1,500 calories before I put on a few pounds so I switched back 1,200 cals.
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    edited November 2017
    filbo132 wrote: »
    filbo132 wrote: »
    *kitten* me and that 1200 calories crap...seriously...I also blame mfp for pushing 1200 calories crap to most women.

    1200 is the MINIMUM that a female should take in if they are very short,sedentary,elderly or a combo of the 3. most women can get away with more calories but some think they cant lose weight unless they eat the minimum or think thats what you need to lose weight,while many also will eat the lowest they can to lose as fast as they can not knowing the repercussions of eating so little.

    I agree with you, but they seem to give that number to a lot of women regardless if they are short or not, this is a good read and I agree fully with the article https://aworkoutroutine.com/1200-calorie-diet/

    I don't blame MFP - it's just a default setting. There has to be a default. A higher setting would be incorrect for shorties.

    1200 has been with us for decades, back when the average woman was shorter. Programs like Biggest Loser give people unrealistic expectations. It's no wonder people so commonly jack up the weekly weight loss goal (which in turn leads to 1200).

    Unfortunately what many people fail to realize (starting out) is that 1200 is the starting point. You earn more calories for exercise.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    OP as others have mentioned, 1200 is the minimum amount of calories recommended for women, and that is a NET goal, meaning if you exercise, you should be eating more.

    What are your stats: height, current weight, goal weight, and what rate of loss did you choose?

    A lot of people have difficulty sticking with 1200/day, and a lot of people, even petite women with a desk job like myself, find that they don't need to go that low in order to lose. I lost most of my weight, ~35 lbs, eating 1600-1800 cals/day.


  • ritzvin
    ritzvin Posts: 2,860 Member
    filbo132 wrote: »
    filbo132 wrote: »
    *kitten* me and that 1200 calories crap...seriously...I also blame mfp for pushing 1200 calories crap to most women.

    1200 is the MINIMUM that a female should take in if they are very short,sedentary,elderly or a combo of the 3. most women can get away with more calories but some think they cant lose weight unless they eat the minimum or think thats what you need to lose weight,while many also will eat the lowest they can to lose as fast as they can not knowing the repercussions of eating so little.

    I agree with you, but they seem to give that number to a lot of women regardless if they are short or not, this is a good read and I agree fully with the article https://aworkoutroutine.com/1200-calorie-diet/

    MFP don't do anything except apply the maths.

    This↑
    ..and MFP also spits out NET calorie goal - one is supposed to eat exercise calories in addition to that 1200. 1200 + exercise calories isn't particularly absurd for those who are short with a desk job.

    In my case, my net maintenance (sedentary job) is estimated at 1400 (before exercise)..Plug 0.5 lb/wk loss into the calculator, and it will spit out 1200 net calories and inform me that it corresponds to 0.4 lb/wk loss estimate.

  • toxikon
    toxikon Posts: 2,383 Member
    www.reddit.com/r/1200isplenty
  • ritzvin
    ritzvin Posts: 2,860 Member
    I do think 1/3 and 1/4 lb/week drop down boxes would be a nice addition to the setup.
  • RuNaRoUnDaFiEld
    RuNaRoUnDaFiEld Posts: 5,864 Member
    ritzvin wrote: »
    I do think 1/3 and 1/4 lb/week drop down boxes would be a nice addition to the setup.

    I think it should have 1% of body weight option.