Should we really be eating back the calories we burn??

I find this so confusing, say I work hard to burn 300 calories at the gym should i be eating them back or keep the deficit?
«13

Replies

  • spiriteagle99
    spiriteagle99 Posts: 3,743 Member
    I eat back all my exercise calories and have maintained easily for the past year. I actually eat somewhat over my goal, and still maintain, because the exercise I do burns a bit more than MFP says since I run and walk in a hilly area.
  • mirandafinch
    mirandafinch Posts: 24 Member
    Thanks guys for taking the time to respond. I think following the eat them back if I’m hungry strategy will work for me, I’m sure I won’t actually need them all x
  • tinkerbellang83
    tinkerbellang83 Posts: 9,129 Member
    edited February 2018
    .
  • AMC110
    AMC110 Posts: 188 Member
    edited February 2018
    I set my activity level to sedentary as I work a desk job, then any exercise I do on top of that I log and eat back the extra calories for after I subtract the calories I would have burned if I had just rested during that time using this net calorie converter.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    It depends on what activity level you used to compute your daily burn of calories. If you said you are fairly active exercising a few hours a week, then you are already getting "credit " for the first few hours.

    To add to correct response by @sijomial - the hours of exercise merely created a goal on the Exercise Diary.

    I've found the majority don't even notice it.

    I wonder if it's still broken from years ago.

    If you mean hoping the activity level makes up for doing some exercise - it really doesn't ramp up fast enough to incorporate exercise, since it has no corresponding level of matching exercise.

    If walking is the exercise you mean, ya, there could be some trade, but you'd have no idea if correct trade.
    Why not use it as designed rather than guessing.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    AMC110 wrote: »
    I set my activity level to sedentary as I work a desk job, then any exercise I do on top of that I log and eat back the extra calories for after I subtract the calories I would have burned if I had just rested during that time using this net calorie converter.

    If interested in getting that accurate, may as well move it up a level.

    MFP already had you estimated to burn a certain amount per day/hour/min.

    A deficit was taken from that to give you your eating goal.

    If you really want it correct, you want the calories from exercise above and beyond what was already accounted for.

    And it was not BMR level burn like that site is doing.
    It was BMR x activity factor.

    This is why some exercise that is low level calorie burn and low intensity for a long time can be such a negative effect with the whole eat back method. And why for others doing more intense shorter things it doesn't matter and it works as expected.

    Look at what MFP expects you to burn daily, or a fresh day's eating goal + deficit.
    That non-exercise TDEE / 1440 = per minute calorie burn already accounted for.

    Whatever estimate for exercise you receive from the database - subtract that.
    Eat that back.
  • AMC110
    AMC110 Posts: 188 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    may as well move it up a level.

    I considered changing my activity level but I don't exercise the same amount each week.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    AMC110 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    may as well move it up a level.

    I considered changing my activity level but I don't exercise the same amount each week.

    i don't think that's what he meant....
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    edited February 2018
    AMC110 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    may as well move it up a level.

    I considered changing my activity level but I don't exercise the same amount each week.

    Sorry, I didn't mean activity level on MFP. Poor choice of term when it's being used already.

    I meant in context a higher level of accuracy. Which I then gave how to do.
  • lois1231
    lois1231 Posts: 330 Member
    I eat back around 1/4 of the calories I burn and it seems to be working well for me.
  • AMC110
    AMC110 Posts: 188 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    AMC110 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    may as well move it up a level.

    I considered changing my activity level but I don't exercise the same amount each week.

    Sorry, I didn't mean activity level on MFP. Poor choice of term when it's being used already.

    I meant in context a higher level of accuracy. Which I then gave how to do.

    Oh I misunderstood, sorry!
  • Kalex1975
    Kalex1975 Posts: 427 Member
    Since this is an associated topic I'll jump in with a question...

    I am about to get an RMR test and am a bit confused. Is RMR the same as NEAT?
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,242 Member
    edited February 2018
    AMC110 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    may as well move it up a level.

    I considered changing my activity level but I don't exercise the same amount each week.

    I will attempt to clarify Heybale's point :)

    You use an external net calculator to estimate your net calories.

    He is saying that you don't know if that calculation uses the same assumptions as MFP.

    Bales suggested that you grab MFP calories from a new day, divide by 1440, and subtract that per minute value from your activity calories. They way you will have a more correct net.


    ETA: oops, he did say plus deficit.

    Add MFP cals from new day PLUS daily deficit and then divide by 1440 is his suggestion.

    So our calculations (see next post) are *exactly* the same.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,242 Member
    If I understood correctly, Bale's suggestion would start from your target daily calories, which already include your deficit.

    More correctly you can calculate your per minute value to deduct as follows:

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator

    Multiply your MFP BMR from the above calculator by the following activity factor depending on how you're setup on MFP:

    Sedentary, lightly active, active, very active use 1.25, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 respectively.

    Divide total by 1440 for per minute value or by 24 for per hour value.

    Subtract from gross exercise calories to get net value.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    I find this so confusing, say I work hard to burn 300 calories at the gym should i be eating them back or keep the deficit?

    If you're doing MFP the way it is intended then exercise isn't included in your activity level...thus your calorie target excludes exercise activity. Exercise increases your overall energy expenditure and this tool is designed for you to log and eat back additional calories for additional activity...that's how you account for that activity.

    MFP will give me about 2000 calories per day to lose about 1 Lb per week...this doesn't include exercise...this only includes a light active activity setting...this means that MFP is estimating my NON exercise maintenance to be around 2500 calories.

    When I exercise and say I burn 350 calories, my target will move from 2000 to 2350...I'm still going to lose the same 1 Lb per week because my maintenance also moved from 2500 to 2,850 and 2,850 - 2,350 = 500 calorie deficit still.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    Kalex1975 wrote: »
    Since this is an associated topic I'll jump in with a question...

    I am about to get an RMR test and am a bit confused. Is RMR the same as NEAT?

    No...NEAT would be additional daily activity like getting up and walking around and brushing your teeth and cooking, cleaning, going to work, etc...your RMR is basically your BMR...the calories you burn merely existing.