cmriverside wrote: » If you get some exercise for an hour a day, you'll get 300-400 more calories. 1700 is a lot easier than 1400.
cmriverside wrote: » @jadedone - I took a peak at your food diary. You are using a lot of cups and generalized portions for your food. You are obviously eating more than you think or you would be losing. "Cups" "medium" "2.38 diameter" etc. are not good measurements and your logging is most likely OFF by several hundred calories a day. Are you weighing that salmon to see if it's 3.5 ounces - or are you guesstimating? A cup of chicken? 8 macadamia nuts? All of that can throw off your logging. Buy a food scale. Use USDA verified entries in the database here - there are lots of erroneous entries in the food list here. Here's a thread about how to use it:http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10621050/how-to-use-the-usda-food-database-mfp-food-database-for-accurate-logging/p1
jadedone wrote: » cmriverside wrote: » @jadedone - I took a peak at your food diary. You are using a lot of cups and generalized portions for your food. You are obviously eating more than you think or you would be losing. "Cups" "medium" "2.38 diameter" etc. are not good measurements and your logging is most likely OFF by several hundred calories a day. Are you weighing that salmon to see if it's 3.5 ounces - or are you guesstimating? A cup of chicken? 8 macadamia nuts? All of that can throw off your logging. Buy a food scale. Use USDA verified entries in the database here - there are lots of erroneous entries in the food list here. Here's a thread about how to use it:http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10621050/how-to-use-the-usda-food-database-mfp-food-database-for-accurate-logging/p1 Thank you for the tip, it is hard to separate the good from the bad in the database. I do not weigh now, I have in the past. I do not eat at home all the time for a myriad of reasons, so I need to be realistic about my life. But I get pretty good at eyeballing sunce I spent a year measuring. I am OK with the guestimates for now. For example, the salmon is pretty accurate - since I had just picked it up from the butcher. Medium carrots? Well I am being lazy, I have the prepackaged baby carrots at work, each pack is 25 calories. So if I grab the same amount for my plate, it is pretty close. I tested my spoons, so I know how much to pour to get to a teaspoon or tablespoon. I had a batch of really small fruits. So medium is accurate. I do not want to become super food obsessed, it isn’t healthy for me. I am looking for the minimum viable in order to get to my goals. I’d rather focus my energies on limiting the amount of oil I used to roast the veggies than if I had 50 or 55 grams of broccoli. I am still working on the sustainable behavior lens for myself. Filling my plate with half veggies. Sticking to card deck protein portions....
CharlieBeansmomTracey wrote: » thing is packaged food can be off by up to 20% per serving. if you dont use a food scale you really dont know how much you are really eating. I learned that the hard way.and using spoons arent really that accurate. the thing with fruits is medium size can range from 20-100 calorie difference per fruit. 2 medium apples can vary. one could be 100 calories or more and the other may be less. its not being food obsessed its being accurate. sometimes its what you have to do to get the weight coming off again. if you arent losing then guesstimating isnt working for you. and is your thyroid levels in the range it should be or ? because thyroid issues can make it hard to lose too(my daughter is hypothyroid). you say you are afraid to become super food obsessed? did you have an eating disorder in the past?
jadedone wrote: » CharlieBeansmomTracey wrote: » thing is packaged food can be off by up to 20% per serving. if you dont use a food scale you really dont know how much you are really eating. I learned that the hard way.and using spoons arent really that accurate. the thing with fruits is medium size can range from 20-100 calorie difference per fruit. 2 medium apples can vary. one could be 100 calories or more and the other may be less. its not being food obsessed its being accurate. sometimes its what you have to do to get the weight coming off again. if you arent losing then guesstimating isnt working for you. and is your thyroid levels in the range it should be or ? because thyroid issues can make it hard to lose too(my daughter is hypothyroid). you say you are afraid to become super food obsessed? did you have an eating disorder in the past? I do not eat much packaged foods. It is rare. But i figure being off by a few baby carrots isn’t going to kill me. I nave been doing 1400 calories for around 2 weeks. One of those weeks was my period. Things were moving, and things tend to stop for me when my period hits. I lose pretty slowly and if there is anything remotely off with my cycle all things stall. I have had a stressful first few months of the year, and I have lost the 8 pounds I gained over the holidays. And taking a break. So I am feeling ok about where things are trending. It is too soon to tell if the calorie change will do the trick. Right now I’d love some food ideas, not a deep dive on if my plan is working or not. There isn’t enough evidence to diagnose anything at this point. 2 weeks is meaningless. For me the weighing food is a “big gun” as is getting hardcore about macros. I am not close enough to my goal weight to pull out the big guns. I also do not want to expemd all of my spare mental energy on food choices. I tend to have insomnia and my brain is way too active at bedtime as it is. I have enough on my plate figuring out my hormomes, getting enough sleep, getting enough exercise and starting a new job. I’m sticking with the easier food adjustments eating 15% less than I was last month. If I am in the neighborhood dood wise and not eating back my exercise calories, I can evaluate if things are working after 6 weeks.
Sam29a wrote: » I'm on 1220 calories and it's not great. I don't eat lunch, have a small snack instead. Also, I find I can easily cut out things like condiments, salad dressings, I cook without oil, make my oats with water, that saves me a lot of calories. Eating lots of vegetables and fruit also helps as they're generally lower in calories than processed food. I still manage to eat chocolate or some other treat daily which keeps me sane. I did manage 1200 calories for just over a year and I know it does get easier with time. Just hang in there!
jadedone wrote: » Sam29a wrote: » I'm on 1220 calories and it's not great. I don't eat lunch, have a small snack instead. Also, I find I can easily cut out things like condiments, salad dressings, I cook without oil, make my oats with water, that saves me a lot of calories. Eating lots of vegetables and fruit also helps as they're generally lower in calories than processed food. I still manage to eat chocolate or some other treat daily which keeps me sane. I did manage 1200 calories for just over a year and I know it does get easier with time. Just hang in there! Good tips! I’m toying around with the idea of smaller breakfasts, since I like heartier lunch and dinner. Or sneaking in a lot of veggies breakfast to stay caught up.