Calorie stability vs Calorie Instability for losing weight. Which works better?
leobrah
Posts: 124 Member
What I mean in my question is this, which works better or does it have no difference.
Let's say I need 1800cal per day to healthily lose weight, is there a difference in:
1) If I eat 2000 cal one day and then 1600 the other.
2) If I eat 1800 cal every day and no more.
Is strict stability crucial to weight loss?
Let's say I need 1800cal per day to healthily lose weight, is there a difference in:
1) If I eat 2000 cal one day and then 1600 the other.
2) If I eat 1800 cal every day and no more.
Is strict stability crucial to weight loss?
0
Replies
-
Some people may have better adherence doing one or the other, but if calories are equal it will make no difference.11
-
notarunnermfp wrote: »Some people may have better adherence doing one or the other, but if calories are equal it will make no difference.
This.6 -
What I mean in my question is this, which works better or does it have no difference.
Let's say I need 1800cal per day to healthily lose weight, is there a difference in:
1) If I eat 2000 cal one day and then 1600 the other.
2) If I eat 1800 cal every day and no more.
Is strict stability crucial to weight loss?
I look at my weekly intake rather than my daily, since (unless you're eating the exact same thing every day) my numbers will fluctuate. As long as my weekly totals are within range, I'm good to go.8 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »No, not at all. What's crucial to weight loss is maintaining a caloric deficit over time. Going over or under your target for any particular day doesn't matter.
I look at my weekly intake rather than my daily, since (unless you're eating the exact same thing every day) my numbers will fluctuate. As long as my weekly totals are within range, I'm good to go.
Alright, thank y'all! That makes a lot of sense.2 -
The greater the instability, the greater chance of scale fluctuations due to changes in water weight (assuming bigger fluctuations = bigger variation in carbs and/or sodium). Those scale fluctuations can make it harder to see/track progress, but should NOT reflect changes in body fat.5
-
No choose what works for you.
I prefer to eat more calories at the weekend as it fits with my family life right now. Others times it hasn't
Weight loss is a long term project....as is weight gain for that matter.1 -
The math equation works the same either way. It's really just a matter of what you'll stick with.1
-
I've done both. The results were equal as long as I kept my calorie deficit from week to week. It's just a matter of which you find more appealing for satiation and adherence. Try them out and see what you like.2
-
What I mean in my question is this, which works better or does it have no difference.
Let's say I need 1800cal per day to healthily lose weight, is there a difference in:
1) If I eat 2000 cal one day and then 1600 the other.
2) If I eat 1800 cal every day and no more.
Is strict stability crucial to weight loss?
Depends on what works for you. You may have some days where you are more active and thus more hungry.1 -
It has no difference so choose the one that is easier for you to keep with.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions