Realistically how long would it take?

2»

Replies

  • climberbry
    climberbry Posts: 22 Member
    peace love and understanding ;)
  • endermako
    endermako Posts: 785 Member
    the slower your weight loss is, the more sustainable it is in the log term because you get to eat more, and transitioning from a deficit to maintenance calories isn't that bad.
  • VUA21
    VUA21 Posts: 2,072 Member
    Possible: yes
    Healthy: highly doubtful

    When losing weight extremely fast for your body (amount of excess fat), you run the very real risk of losing a lot more than just fat. Muscle mass and bone density can also be lost. Losing muscle mass will leave you jiggly, losing bone density sets you up for early and more severe osteoporosis.
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    climberbry wrote: »
    Yes, I agree, just by cutting calories alone, it's NOT realistic.

    This is very realistic and considering caloric intake holds the highest potential for impact, reducing this also holds the highest potential for success.

    The ideal change would be to reduce calorie and increase physical activity. Noting that a majority of individuals who successfully lose and maintain their weight implement both. They create a number of habits and positive feedback mechanisms supporting their health goals.
This discussion has been closed.