Abs Question

jerrardsmods11 wrote: »

I know that doing crunches/sit-ups won’t get you abs. Cardio will. So, say you’ve done cardio and now there isn’t much fat covering your belly. Does your abs show as a 4-6 pack or does doing ab exercises help to show them more? I hope you understand, that was difficult to explain.

Having visible abs means you have 1) Developed ab muscles and 2) low enough body fat for them to show.

Cardio isn't required to lower body fat. If you're low bf and they're not showing then you may need to develop them more. But also, some people just don't have the genetics for a six pack or have to have such a low bf that maintaining it is difficult.

Packerjohn wrote: »

kami3006 wrote: »

jerrardsmods11 wrote: »

I know that doing crunches/sit-ups won’t get you abs. Cardio will. So, say you’ve done cardio and now there isn’t much fat covering your belly. Does your abs show as a 4-6 pack or does doing ab exercises help to show them more? I hope you understand, that was difficult to explain.

Having visible abs means you have 1) Developed ab muscles and 2) low enough body fat for them to show.

Cardio isn't required to lower body fat. If you're low bf and they're not showing then you may need to develop them more. But also, some people just don't have the genetics for a six pack or have to have such a low bf that maintaining it is difficult.

Actually it's more based on the amount of fat covering the abs. Was listening to a podcast where a couple guys with Masters in Exercise Science were discussing a number of topics. One mentioned the 300 pound cadaver he had examined in school, said that guy had a 6 pack under all the fat. History showed the deceased wasn't an exercise person.

I knew I worded that poorly. I didn't mean developed in the sense of having exercised to develop them but how they naturally are. Like the cadaver mentioned in your example.

Ok so I'm in the pole community so i regularly train with very strong women, a lot of who are carrying a lot of excess body fat. Maybe about 30% on a women and yet they have visible abs. That's nothing to do with cardio. And mostly it's a 6 pack that you can see. Mine are more the long lines of ridges of abs either side of my tummy and I'm about 25% bf as that's my genetics. Yes when I had lower bf i had a visible 6 pack, and with higher it's more of what a muggle would call "toned tummy" but you will see my 6 pack again as I get back to full strength (I'm a year post partum) and I won't need to do any cardio or lower my bf for that to happen, I just happen to do a fitness which is crazy good for abs.

sardelsa wrote: »

No cardio has nothing to do with abs.

In the end, abs are dependent on low enough BF% but genetics and muscle base as well. For example I have been lower BF a few times (also underweight) and while I looked pretty lean and had definition, I never had a 6-pack or anything like that. I don't have the muscle base for them and probably never will (also it is not a goal of mine). I am also female so I know it is harder for them to show.

100% agree.

Currently, at 5 foot 9 and 130 lbs, (8 lbs less than profile pic) I have an outline and if I give it a good flex, I have abs. Nothing like a defined 6 pack that competitors have though. For me to get there, I'd need to lose more weight which should not be one of my goals right now.

Personally, a few lbs makes a big difference. But, I used to be much thinner and I had 0 definition because I had very little muscle mass. I went through a 60 lb bulk, adding both fat and muscle, and then trimmed back 20 lbs to where I am now.

jerrardsmods11 wrote: »

Thanks for all of the responses! I have a little belly fat and I can see a 4 pack. I just need to combine cardio/resistance training to help burn off that fat.

Naw, you need a calorie deficit. That'll burn off fat and your muscle will show through. Eat at a slight deficit and keep up the training. It could be just a 5 or so pound difference, which is not that difficult to achieve.