1750 vs 1550 cal/day for 6'0 220 lb man?
ehimass
Posts: 92 Member
Hi,
Setting my goals like everyone else, I can't decide if I should go for 1750 cal or 1550 cals per day. Currently 6'0" 220 pounds (probably 25% body fat), goal is 180 pounds and <15% body fat.
Basically the difference would be an extra protein shake on the 1750 cal plan for 220g daily protein vs 180g. I can't decide if the slower weight loss from the extra protein would be worth it because of potentially better body composition. I know I'm splititng hairs, but just looking for opinions. I am doing about an hour of cardio per day and a weight routine 3x weekly.
Setting my goals like everyone else, I can't decide if I should go for 1750 cal or 1550 cals per day. Currently 6'0" 220 pounds (probably 25% body fat), goal is 180 pounds and <15% body fat.
Basically the difference would be an extra protein shake on the 1750 cal plan for 220g daily protein vs 180g. I can't decide if the slower weight loss from the extra protein would be worth it because of potentially better body composition. I know I'm splititng hairs, but just looking for opinions. I am doing about an hour of cardio per day and a weight routine 3x weekly.
0
Replies
-
Did you fill out your profile and get MFP's recommendation for 1 lb/week loss?
8 -
Yeah, it says 2300 per day for 1 pound per week so I guess I should go with 1750 if I was deciding between the two, which is the answer I expected.2
-
I am a 5'4 female who started at 145 lbs and lost weight on 1550. I can't imagine that is the right calorie goal for you. If you set your goal to lose 2 lbs per week, that's really only appropriate if you are obese, plus your mfp goal assumes you will log your exercise and eat back those cals too.9
-
lonestarwings wrote: »Yeah, it says 2300 per day for 1 pound per week so I guess I should go with 1750 if I was deciding between the two, which is the answer I expected.
If you're interested in preserving muscle mass, go with the 2300 + exercise calories. A 2 lb/week loss (which is what 1750 would give you) is too aggressive with only 40 lbs to lose.13 -
lonestarwings wrote: »Yeah, it says 2300 per day for 1 pound per week so I guess I should go with 1750 if I was deciding between the two, which is the answer I expected.
If mfp said 2300, why would you eat 550 calories less? Sounds like a prescription for losing muscle and feeling awful.13 -
If your current BF estimate of 25 percent is correct, this means your lean body mass is 165 lbs. At your goal BW of 180 lbs and 15 percent BF, your LBM would be 153 lbs. Is this the result you’re seeking?1
-
All right, can the moderators please delete this. Don't need the lectures and snark.16
-
What lectures and snark?????
You asked a question, people replied, politely explaining why the number you suggest is too low.12 -
lonestarwings wrote: »Yeah, it says 2300 per day for 1 pound per week so I guess I should go with 1750 if I was deciding between the two, which is the answer I expected.
why not go for 2300 then?4 -
lonestarwings wrote: »All right, can the moderators please delete this. Don't need the lectures and snark.
If you didn't need the info you would have been planning to eat the 2500+ Cal a day your 2300+exercise calories would amount to... and losing weight sensibly.8 -
lonestarwings wrote: »All right, can the moderators please delete this. Don't need the lectures and snark.
I would actually ask the moderators to not delete this.
That's not a jab at you, but your response actually demonstrates a common fundamental misunderstanding of how this stuff works. There are most likely way more lurkers than posters, and the responses here to your question can benefit them.
If you put in a goal of 1 pound per week, which is absolutely reasonable, then you should be eating 2300 calories PLUS whatever amount you exercise.
To give you a point of reference, I'm 5'11". I started at 240 in February of 2017. I landed at 192 about 34 weeks later. I averaged eating about 2400 calories per day during that span. And I believe at that time I may have been on the aggressive side. If I had it to do over again, I would have eaten more protein and started lifting heavy much sooner.
There is no good reason for you to be eating 1550 (or 1750 for that matter) calories. You can do it if you want to, but there are ramifications to LBM loss. 12 pounds of it, as @pierinifitness mentions above, is pretty substantial. Rapid and weight loss are two terms that should not go together in your case.
14 -
lonestarwings wrote: »Hi,
Setting my goals like everyone else, I can't decide if I should go for 1750 cal or 1550 cals per day. Currently 6'0" 220 pounds (probably 25% body fat), goal is 180 pounds and <15% body fat.
Basically the difference would be an extra protein shake on the 1750 cal plan for 220g daily protein vs 180g. I can't decide if the slower weight loss from the extra protein would be worth it because of potentially better body composition. I know I'm splititng hairs, but just looking for opinions. I am doing about an hour of cardio per day and a weight routine 3x weekly.
Not really splitting hairs when it comes to safe weight loss and needing energy to fuel and perform all the exercise you outlined plus your day to day activities.
This isn't a quick cut, doing this rapidly and being is a sustained deficit of this size doesn't make body composition better and side effects will hopefully have you rethink this.0 -
@lonestarwings there's no snark, one pound per week is a perfectly decent rate of loss for your stats and 2300 is a good starting point.
I am 4 inches shorter than you and female and lose one pound per week on around 1900 + exercise calories.
Your maintenance at Sedentary would be around 2470 per day, so if you add an hour of cardio per day you're talking probably at least a TDEE of 2870. 1 pound per week loss is 500 calorie deficit from your TDEE (3500 calories/7 days). Which would put you at around 2370 to lose.
You can surely see why people would suggest 1550/1750 is too low, no?
5 -
Lectures & snark?
Wow... I've been trying to help out around here with the January rush of newbies. If using my time to provide factual info to help someone achieve their goals is greeted like this, maybe I'll rethink. I mean, there are certainly threads were I can see people taking replies the wrong way, but this? @kimny72 snarky? *shaking head*8 -
lonestarwings thanks for this post, I clicked on it because I was also eating 1750. I am 5'11'' 205, goal 190. I do a lot of cardio and would eat back calories. Now I am adding 4 days of weights to my routine.
After reading responses I am upping my daily calorie goal and more protein. Thanks everyone for good responses.
16
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions