database entries and differences
Options
littlesewflake
Posts: 15 Member
I am not sure how to use the MFP database when so many of the entries seem to contradict each other. How do you account for the sometimes massive differences in calories/fat/nutrients listed in the database?
0
Replies
-
I scan my labels for everything that I have. For other things that dont have labels I try to find a USDA entry or I create my own.0
-
For whole foods you can use the USDA database https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list
For other foods, double check entries with the packaging on your food. If you use a scanner, be sure to double check that as it brings up user-created entries that can be erroneous.
For home cooked foods, create your own recipe in the recipe builder to account for your actual ingredients and portions. There's no way to know what in someone else's homemade foods.
There's a learning curve but it gets easier the more you do it. Plus, once you log a food, it's in your recent list for future use.3 -
littlesewflake wrote: »I am not sure how to use the MFP database when so many of the entries seem to contradict each other. How do you account for the sometimes massive differences in calories/fat/nutrients listed in the database?
The MFP database is made up of 2 types of entries: 1) the USDA database and 2) user entered.
The USDA database is accurate for all single food items (apple, rice, flour, celery, etc) so when you want to get the info on your 93% lean ground beef, enter this in search: beef-ground-93% lean-usda. There will be some other measurements as people tweak the entries but the "official" USDA entries are always per 100 grams. Easy peasy: weigh your raw hamburger and if it comes up as 140 grams it is 1.4 servings of 100 grams.
User entered items are where problems occur. Double check the listing with the label on the package. It may have not been entered correctly OR the recipe changed and the package you bought is newer than the entry.
I don't scan. I find it brings up too many bad entries. It doesn't take much time to do a quick search and enter. Double checking and replacing when the scan was wrong takes up more time.5 -
Double check with the packaging label. For whole foods, you can double check against the USDA database. If you're picking generic recipes like "homemade lasagna" or whatever, you'll never know because those are just some random users entries from their recipe and you have no idea what their recipe was. For that kind of thing, you should use the recipe builder...anything else is just a shot in the dark.0
-
I scan my labels for everything that I have. For other things that dont have labels I try to find a USDA entry or I create my own.
Scanning doesn't magically ensure the entries you get are correct. They are still, for the most part, user entered. You should verify them against the info on the package label.4 -
littlesewflake wrote: »I am not sure how to use the MFP database when so many of the entries seem to contradict each other. How do you account for the sometimes massive differences in calories/fat/nutrients listed in the database?
The MFP database is made up of 2 types of entries: 1) the USDA database and 2) user entered.
The USDA database is accurate for all single food items (apple, rice, flour, celery, etc) so when you want to get the info on your 93% lean ground beef, enter this in search: beef-ground-93% lean-usda. There will be some other measurements as people tweak the entries but the "official" USDA entries are always per 100 grams. Easy peasy: weigh your raw hamburger and if it comes up as 140 grams it is 1.4 servings of 100 grams.
User entered items are where problems occur. Double check the listing with the label on the package. It may have not been entered correctly OR the recipe changed and the package you bought is newer than the entry.
I don't scan. I find it brings up too many bad entries. It doesn't take much time to do a quick search and enter. Double checking and replacing when the scan was wrong takes up more time.
I generally agree on most of this except the part about "official" USDA entries "always being per 100 g." While they pretty much always have that as one of the serving size options, very often it is not the default option, and you'll have to use the drop-down menu to find 100 g. Also, some of the "official" USDA entries have lost the 100 g option, I think during an effort by MFP to add imperial serving size options to entries with metric options and vice versa, so people wouldn't have to convert.1 -
lynn_glenmont wrote: »littlesewflake wrote: »I am not sure how to use the MFP database when so many of the entries seem to contradict each other. How do you account for the sometimes massive differences in calories/fat/nutrients listed in the database?
The MFP database is made up of 2 types of entries: 1) the USDA database and 2) user entered.
The USDA database is accurate for all single food items (apple, rice, flour, celery, etc) so when you want to get the info on your 93% lean ground beef, enter this in search: beef-ground-93% lean-usda. There will be some other measurements as people tweak the entries but the "official" USDA entries are always per 100 grams. Easy peasy: weigh your raw hamburger and if it comes up as 140 grams it is 1.4 servings of 100 grams.
User entered items are where problems occur. Double check the listing with the label on the package. It may have not been entered correctly OR the recipe changed and the package you bought is newer than the entry.
I don't scan. I find it brings up too many bad entries. It doesn't take much time to do a quick search and enter. Double checking and replacing when the scan was wrong takes up more time.
I generally agree on most of this except the part about "official" USDA entries "always being per 100 g." While they pretty much always have that as one of the serving size options, very often it is not the default option, and you'll have to use the drop-down menu to find 100 g. Also, some of the "official" USDA entries have lost the 100 g option, I think during an effort by MFP to add imperial serving size options to entries with metric options and vice versa, so people wouldn't have to convert.
Never mind. .0 -
Unfortunately, the "verified" green check marks in the MFP database are used for both user-created entries and system entries that MFP pulled from the USDA database. To find system entries for whole foods, I get the syntax from the USDA database and plug that into MFP.
For packaged foods, I verify the label against what I find in MFP.
Note: any entry that includes "USDA" in it was a user-entered entry - system entries do not have this. On the rare occasions that I cannot find a system entry for whole foods I will search instead for the number from the USDA database. For example, the system entry for "Egg, whole, raw, fresh" has disappeared from the database and when I need to use it in the recipe builder I will search for the USDA number, 01123, and use that instead.2 -
kshama2001 wrote: »Unfortunately, the "verified" green check marks in the MFP database are used for both user-created entries and system entries that MFP pulled from the USDA database. To find system entries for whole foods, I get the syntax from the USDA database and plug that into MFP.
For packaged foods, I verify the label against what I find in MFP.
Note: any entry that includes "USDA" in it was a user-entered entry - system entries do not have this. On the rare occasions that I cannot find a system entry for whole foods I will search instead for the number from the USDA database. For example, the system entry for "Egg, whole, raw, fresh" has disappeared from the database and when I need to use it in the recipe builder I will search for the USDA number, 01123, and use that instead.
Yeah, this. System (Admin) added entries will not say USDA, and I generally look for that long list of choices in the drop down portion sizes in the Nutrition box, and will often if not always find the 100g (it really should be in all of them - I haven't found one that it isn't, but I've been wrong before.) Now, the 100g option has been corrupted in an update and it will sometimes give a HUGELY inflated calorie count. So there is that.
Best thing is to verify each entry. Once you use it it goes in your Recent or your Frequent list (or both,) so it will be easy to find next time. Most of us use the same foods over and over, so it is a problem that solves itself in time and with regular use.1 -
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 396 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 967 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions