Run/Walk Intervals: Best Method to Estimate Calories?
Options
Kalex1975
Posts: 427 Member
I have walked a lot over the last few years. To estimate my calories burned I have been using the formula: Distance in miles x Weight in lbs x 0.3. I have seen that the formula for running is: Distance in miles x Weight in lbs x 0.63
Now that I am in maintenance and am in the best shape of my life I have been itching to begin jogging. I've used the C25K app and liked what it provided. I know it may sound silly, but the main thing that has prevented me from committing to interval training is knowing how to estimate the calories I have burned.
Do you have a method that combines the 2 formulas to estimate your calories? Do you track your distances between walking and running, if so, how? Any other methods you feel work best?
Thanks in advance for your comments. I am so appreciative of the MFP community - I've learned so much from these boards!
Now that I am in maintenance and am in the best shape of my life I have been itching to begin jogging. I've used the C25K app and liked what it provided. I know it may sound silly, but the main thing that has prevented me from committing to interval training is knowing how to estimate the calories I have burned.
Do you have a method that combines the 2 formulas to estimate your calories? Do you track your distances between walking and running, if so, how? Any other methods you feel work best?
Thanks in advance for your comments. I am so appreciative of the MFP community - I've learned so much from these boards!
0
Replies
-
I am just trusting the numbers my Fitbit gives me for the c25k intervals. I’m finding it is not much more calories burned than when I have briskly walked the same time period. 5 weeks into c25k I am not seeing a large drop on the scale but I am seeing significant difference in how my clothes fit and my endurance has increased more than I had imagined.2
-
Not sure if you like fitness gadgets but, I use a Garmin 920XT along with a heart monitor for my run/walks to estimate my calorie burn and distance. I like that it beeps/vibrates to tell me it's time to run and/or walk. I had a few friends that recommended the run/walk method by Jeff Galloway. Saying that it helped them build up to running longer distances. I use the 4 minute run and 1 minute walk, but there are all kinds of variations. So far I love the run/walk and it has helped me do a few half marathons.2
-
I would use a fitness tracker and base the calories on the average pace. For example if you jog at a 10:00 pace and walk at a 18:00 pace maybe your average is an 11:30 pace (don’t judge me - didn’t do the math). Base your calories on that 11:30 pace.2
-
Thanks @emmamcgarity @Steff46 and @garystrickland357
I have been reluctant to use the tech because I've heard how often they can be off and because of what I've seen in my cases...
I use MapMyWalk on my phone with a heart rate monitor and was always surprised by the calorie burns it gave me vs. the formula I referenced. For example, my last long walk was 8.83 miles and it estimated my calories at 1,359 vs. 566 calories using the formula. More than twice the estimate! I know may pace was pretty fast (13:43 average) for that walk and the difference between net and gross probably accounts for some of that difference, but not that much (I hope).
I could just go with the MapMyWalk estimate and do the 50% thing. Hoping there may be other ideas too.
@garystrickland357 is there a formula you use with the average pace?1 -
Thanks @emmamcgarity @Steff46 and @garystrickland357
I have been reluctant to use the tech because I've heard how often they can be off and because of what I've seen in my cases...
I use MapMyWalk on my phone with a heart rate monitor and was always surprised by the calorie burns it gave me vs. the formula I referenced. For example, my last long walk was 8.83 miles and it estimated my calories at 1,359 vs. 566 calories using the formula. More than twice the estimate! I know may pace was pretty fast (13:43 average) for that walk and the difference between net and gross probably accounts for some of that difference, but not that much (I hope).
I could just go with the MapMyWalk estimate and do the 50% thing. Hoping there may be other ideas too.
@garystrickland357 is there a formula you use with the average pace?
mapmywalk is notorious for overestimating calorie burns.
garmin is pretty accurate, fitbit it seems to depend on the person.3 -
@Kalex1975 I just use the pace calculated by my Garmin.1
-
I try to remember that it’s all estimates regardless of the method used and let hunger be my guide on how many exercise calories I choose to eat back.1
-
emmamcgarity wrote: »I try to remember that it’s all estimates regardless of the method used and let hunger be my guide on how many exercise calories I choose to eat back.
the runger is real for me, if i did that i would gain weight every time i trained for a half marathon! (my first half i gained 7lbs!)3 -
The overall pace method assumes you are running the entire time, which will overestimate since walking burns approximately half the calories per mile as running.
If you had a Garmin or similar device or a GPS tracking app which has a lap feature, you could use lap to split up the running/walking segments so they could be easily added together.
The HRM algorithms assume steady state cardio at a moderate effort. Run/walk intervals will affect the accuracy of estimates, although to what extent will be variable based on the implementation. And they aren't designed or very good for low intensity workouts, such as walking.
1 -
You can compare your overall pace/time calorie estimate to the other sites.
Gross is how it would be handled for tracker synced in which uses a replace method, NET is how it should be handled for stand-alone MFP as an add method (sadly they use Gross database, hence the comments to take % off stated calorie burns).
https://exrx.net/Calculators/WalkRunMETs
You can also use that to do a pretend interval session where you get the calorie burn for walking separate from running and add together, compared to just taking the average pace.
You'll find usually not much difference at all.1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »Thanks @emmamcgarity @Steff46 and @garystrickland357
I have been reluctant to use the tech because I've heard how often they can be off and because of what I've seen in my cases...
I use MapMyWalk on my phone with a heart rate monitor and was always surprised by the calorie burns it gave me vs. the formula I referenced. For example, my last long walk was 8.83 miles and it estimated my calories at 1,359 vs. 566 calories using the formula. More than twice the estimate! I know may pace was pretty fast (13:43 average) for that walk and the difference between net and gross probably accounts for some of that difference, but not that much (I hope).
I could just go with the MapMyWalk estimate and do the 50% thing. Hoping there may be other ideas too.
@garystrickland357 is there a formula you use with the average pace?
mapmywalk is notorious for overestimating calorie burns.
garmin is pretty accurate, fitbit it seems to depend on the person.
this.
Garmin pretty much always gives me the formula.. anytime I've checked, it has indeed been 72-74calories/mile which fits the 0.63x___ formula. (Includes runs with and without the HRM). (ETA: also includes runs with some walking intervals)
If your average pace is in run territory, I wouldn't worry about overcounting any walking intervals, especially considering the distance covered will only be ~half as much per minute and you are probably already spending the majority of the time running. (ie the walking portion as a percentage of the distance covered is probably pretty small).1 -
I just got an app called Intervals for exactly this, I have an Apple Watch but the phone app might be useful? Walking and running is generally about moving weight over distance rather than anything else I think so the phone alone might be able to ballpark well enough.0
-
If your average pace is in run territory, I wouldn't worry about overcounting any walking intervals, especially considering the distance covered will only be ~half as much per minute and you are probably already spending the majority of the time running. (ie the walking portion as a percentage of the distance covered is probably pretty small).
If the run:walk intervals aren't too heavy on walking, this will pretty much be the case. For a 4:1 run:walk interval (run 4 minutes, walk 1) and a 20 minute/mile walking pace and 8 minute/mile running pace, it would only overestimate calories by 5% to assume you ran the entire distance. That is within the limit of accuracy for calorie estimates.2 -
I see zero benefit in using a hopeless calorie estimating app (MapMyWalk) and then randomly guessing what proportion to take off. Starting with bad data is pretty pointless.
Either use a better device or app (Strava perhaps?) or just do the educated guessing/estimating yourself.
I'd simply use any old device to measure distance and then use a number between 0.3 and 0.63 depending on the proportion of walking and running you do.
Please keep in mind that exercise estimates simply don't have to be accurate - they just need to be reasonable to be usable. In the context of a big number (your CI) some inaccuracy in your small number (exercise) isn't going to make a significant difference. Even if it had a small impact it's going to be very slow in manifesting itself and you are going to notice before it's a problem.4 -
Thanks everyone, appreciate all the comments!
Knowing how bad the estimates from MapMyWalk were (thanks to this community) I never relied on its calorie estimates - only to get the distance and see the other analysis.
It sounds like the Garmin is the most accurate of the wearable tech. Until I commit to purchasing one I'm going to give the Intervals app that @MelanieCN77 recommended and Strava a try and see how it goes. Will also try to compute based on the proportions of walking vs. running.
1 -
The free version of Intervals only shows you your most recent workout, FYI, so screen grab the stuff if you want to keep it for reference. Works great though.1
-
If you know the distance that you've covered and the approximate run / walk proportions you could work it out. For example if you walked 60% of the time and covered 10 miles it would be 6 miles at the walking formula and 4 at running (even simpler if you were doing 50/50 by using 0.46 as your factor.
I'm another Garmin 920 user / fan, largely because of its multi-sport capabilities and built in triathlon setting. It is a discontinued model, if and when you consider wearable technology you can find some great deals on them.1 -
When I used to do that, I just used my HRM and lopped off my BMR calories. I found it to be good enough.1
-
I have walked a lot over the last few years. To estimate my calories burned I have been using the formula: Distance in miles x Weight in lbs x 0.3. I have seen that the formula for running is: Distance in miles x Weight in lbs x 0.63
Now that I am in maintenance and am in the best shape of my life I have been itching to begin jogging. I've used the C25K app and liked what it provided. I know it may sound silly, but the main thing that has prevented me from committing to interval training is knowing how to estimate the calories I have burned.
Do you have a method that combines the 2 formulas to estimate your calories? Do you track your distances between walking and running, if so, how? Any other methods you feel work best?
Thanks in advance for your comments. I am so appreciative of the MFP community - I've learned so much from these boards!
I wouldn't overthink it. For the first four weeks just use the walking calculation, after that use the running. While there is an error, in the grand scheme of things it's negligible.3 -
garystrickland357 wrote: »I would use a fitness tracker and base the calories on the average pace. For example if you jog at a 10:00 pace and walk at a 18:00 pace maybe your average is an 11:30 pace (don’t judge me - didn’t do the math). Base your calories on that 11:30 pace.
Only because you said "don't judge me":
It's really hard to prove or disprove your math, without a few more variables - like how many minutes at each pace.2 -
autumnblade75 wrote: »garystrickland357 wrote: »I would use a fitness tracker and base the calories on the average pace. For example if you jog at a 10:00 pace and walk at a 18:00 pace maybe your average is an 11:30 pace (don’t judge me - didn’t do the math). Base your calories on that 11:30 pace.
Only because you said "don't judge me":
It's really hard to prove or disprove your math, without a few more variables - like how many minutes at each pace.
Thanks for not judging, lol.
Today is a good example of what I was getting at... I ran 5 miles and used a 4:1 run walk interval. My running pace varied between 9:00 and 9:30 min/mile. I walk at 18:00 to 20:00 min/mile. Of course there’s crossing streets, headwind, tailwind, etc.. My Garmin app calculated the entire event averaged a 10:30 min/mile pace. I was suggesting he let his smart device do the math.
These are the kinds of things that are easy to overthink anyway. As one member here puts it whatever our devices calculate is a “gaudy fictitious” number of calories anyway - just an estimate.3 -
Just a quick update, I was at the gym yesterday so did my intervals on the treadmill. It made it pretty easy to monitor the distance and compute based on the proportion of walking vs. running.
My usual habit on the treadmill is to do 65 minutes of walking which gets me to a total of about 4.8 miles. This works out to about 310 calories for me using the "weight x distance x 0.3" formula.
Yesterday in those same 65 minutes I ran a total of 2.25 miles and walked 3.03 miles (5.28 miles). Using the 2 formulas for walking and running it worked out to about 490 calories.
Those extra calories got me a latte instead of a caffe misto from Starbucks and a bigger protein snack. Loving it!
1 -
Just a quick update, I was at the gym yesterday so did my intervals on the treadmill. It made it pretty easy to monitor the distance and compute based on the proportion of walking vs. running.
My usual habit on the treadmill is to do 65 minutes of walking which gets me to a total of about 4.8 miles. This works out to about 310 calories for me using the "weight x distance x 0.3" formula.
Yesterday in those same 65 minutes I ran a total of 2.25 miles and walked 3.03 miles (5.28 miles). Using the 2 formulas for walking and running it worked out to about 490 calories.
Those extra calories got me a latte instead of a caffe misto from Starbucks and a bigger protein snack. Loving it!
Out of curiosity, what did the treadmill say for cals burned over the 5.28 miles?1 -
Just a quick update, I was at the gym yesterday so did my intervals on the treadmill. It made it pretty easy to monitor the distance and compute based on the proportion of walking vs. running.
My usual habit on the treadmill is to do 65 minutes of walking which gets me to a total of about 4.8 miles. This works out to about 310 calories for me using the "weight x distance x 0.3" formula.
Yesterday in those same 65 minutes I ran a total of 2.25 miles and walked 3.03 miles (5.28 miles). Using the 2 formulas for walking and running it worked out to about 490 calories.
Those extra calories got me a latte instead of a caffe misto from Starbucks and a bigger protein snack. Loving it!
Out of curiosity, what did the treadmill say for cals burned over the 5.28 miles?
Sorry, I don't remember exactly... think it was around 800. I did track it in MapMyWalk which gave me 920 calories!0 -
Just a quick update, I was at the gym yesterday so did my intervals on the treadmill. It made it pretty easy to monitor the distance and compute based on the proportion of walking vs. running.
My usual habit on the treadmill is to do 65 minutes of walking which gets me to a total of about 4.8 miles. This works out to about 310 calories for me using the "weight x distance x 0.3" formula.
Yesterday in those same 65 minutes I ran a total of 2.25 miles and walked 3.03 miles (5.28 miles). Using the 2 formulas for walking and running it worked out to about 490 calories.
Those extra calories got me a latte instead of a caffe misto from Starbucks and a bigger protein snack. Loving it!
Out of curiosity, what did the treadmill say for cals burned over the 5.28 miles?
Sorry, I don't remember exactly... think it was around 800. I did track it in MapMyWalk which gave me 920 calories!
Wow, big differences in cals... usually treadmills are pretty accurate if it allows you to enter your weight. the only thing that it may seem to overestimate is that it includes total cals burned during that period of time, not just the calories due to the exercise... in other words, it includes your maintenance cals, with are typically in the 1-1.75 cals/minute, but that would only account for 100 ish cals over 65 mins, so 700ish vs the 490 your calculation gave you1 -
Wow, big differences in cals... usually treadmills are pretty accurate if it allows you to enter your weight. the only thing that it may seem to overestimate is that it includes total cals burned during that period of time, not just the calories due to the exercise... in other words, it includes your maintenance cals, with are typically in the 1-1.75 cals/minute, but that would only account for 100 ish cals over 65 mins, so 700ish vs the 490 your calculation gave you
Yeah, I did enter my weight on the machine. My guess may have been off. I know I'm going to hit the treadmill again tomorrow - I'll be sure to check the number for sure then.
1 -
Wow, big differences in cals... usually treadmills are pretty accurate if it allows you to enter your weight. the only thing that it may seem to overestimate is that it includes total cals burned during that period of time, not just the calories due to the exercise... in other words, it includes your maintenance cals, with are typically in the 1-1.75 cals/minute, but that would only account for 100 ish cals over 65 mins, so 700ish vs the 490 your calculation gave you
Yeah, I did enter my weight on the machine. My guess may have been off. I know I'm going to hit the treadmill again tomorrow - I'll be sure to check the number for sure then.
@erickirb
Just got back from the gym. Ran 2.5 miles and walked 2.9 miles which totals about 520 calories using the formulas.
Treadmill showed 924 calories and MapMyWalk showed 966 calories.
Quite the difference!
0 -
Wow, big differences in cals... usually treadmills are pretty accurate if it allows you to enter your weight. the only thing that it may seem to overestimate is that it includes total cals burned during that period of time, not just the calories due to the exercise... in other words, it includes your maintenance cals, with are typically in the 1-1.75 cals/minute, but that would only account for 100 ish cals over 65 mins, so 700ish vs the 490 your calculation gave you
Yeah, I did enter my weight on the machine. My guess may have been off. I know I'm going to hit the treadmill again tomorrow - I'll be sure to check the number for sure then.
@erickirb
Just got back from the gym. Ran 2.5 miles and walked 2.9 miles which totals about 520 calories using the formulas.
Treadmill showed 924 calories and MapMyWalk showed 966 calories.
Quite the difference!
Maybe the treadmill uses the formula fro runnjng, regardless the speed??2 -
If you are following C25k, you know how many minutes you are running and how many minutes you are walking. MFP seems to use time rather than distance for its walking and running computations, so I would put in 15 minutes walking at x pace (4mph) and 15 minutes running if that's what you are doing.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.3K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 442 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions