MFP, Strava, Garmin kcals
gaz458
Posts: 23 Member
Hi, so all 3 have very different kcals burnt, I use a Heart rate monitor. So for a 4hr 30min bike ride Garmin says I've burnt 2049 Strava says 3175 and MFP says 4017 nearly double Garmin. All 3 apps have the same personal details in. I know I need to eat back my calories when exercising but which is correct? I've been going off the Garmin as that's the lowest but if that's not enough I won't recover correctly?
0
Replies
-
Pick one or a percentage of one (personally I would go with 50-75% of the Garmin) for 4-6 weeks and monitor what your weight does vs what you're expecting it to do and adjust accordingly. Losing more than expected - eat more, Gaining more than expected - eat less.2
-
tinkerbellang83 wrote: »Pick one or a percentage of one (personally I would go with 50-75% of the Garmin) for 4-6 weeks and monitor what your weight does vs what you're expecting it to do and adjust accordingly. Losing more than expected - eat more, Gaining more than expected - eat less.
Agreed. There's no way to know for sure, so pick 1, be consistent with it, and evaluate as you go.1 -
For that long a ride, indeed lack of recovery could show up much easier with an extra undesired 1000 defcit.
It's when that ride is spread over a week and you have the same wrong numbers that lack of recovery might be much harder to show up, or if enough break days you might not get it.
Garmin without a power meter I've found underestimated - Strava compared to a power meter I've found underestimated a little. Leave MFP out since you have 2 tools with better estimates.
0 -
For that long a ride, indeed lack of recovery could show up much easier with an extra undesired 1000 defcit.
It's when that ride is spread over a week and you have the same wrong numbers that lack of recovery might be much harder to show up, or if enough break days you might not get it.
Garmin without a power meter I've found underestimated - Strava compared to a power meter I've found underestimated a little. Leave MFP out since you have 2 tools with better estimates.
Ah thank you.
So you use a power meter and Strava is closer than Garmin. So if I work of the bases of strava that's gonna be closer, if I gain weight I'll lower it 10% and so on.
Also do strength training on my off days so maybe weighing myself isn't the correct way either.
I know after some harder rides my legs hurt for a few days where others are back on it so maybe I've been under eating following Garmin estimate.0 -
And this was a Garmin with tested HRmax inputed, and any other tweaks possible - which isn't much after firmware updates. But still, not totally default mode. Per HR just underestimated a decent amount.
Originally I thought the Strava had to be way off because I noticed how bad their elevation details were, so I imagined their watts and calorie estimate had to be pretty underestimated too.
After getting power meter discovered they were not that far below. Less elevation changes less the difference, except here wind huge factor which they can't know about. Their elevation details still way off, but no matter, get those details in SportTracks.
With those types of workouts - trying to find a valid weigh-in day to minimize known water weight fluctuations can be mighty difficult.
While it can be interesting to note a 15 lb water weight loss after a ride, and see that there is still 5 lbs the next morning - that has nothing to do with true weight. Lot less variance day after lifting with increased water weight. Still not valid weight though.1 -
Personal opinion is go with the Garmin estimates and watch what happens on the scale over a few weeks. YMMV1
-
Cheers all 👍🏼0
-
For that long a ride, indeed lack of recovery could show up much easier with an extra undesired 1000 defcit.
It's when that ride is spread over a week and you have the same wrong numbers that lack of recovery might be much harder to show up, or if enough break days you might not get it.
Garmin without a power meter I've found underestimated - Strava compared to a power meter I've found underestimated a little. Leave MFP out since you have 2 tools with better estimates.
Ah thank you.
So you use a power meter and Strava is closer than Garmin. So if I work of the bases of strava that's gonna be closer, if I gain weight I'll lower it 10% and so on.
Also do strength training on my off days so maybe weighing myself isn't the correct way either.
I know after some harder rides my legs hurt for a few days where others are back on it so maybe I've been under eating following Garmin estimate.
If your legs still hurt from last time while you're on the bike, try eating more protein.
Strava estimates calories by working out the power necessary to move your bike at the speed in your file over the terrain you rode. They get it wrong when it's windy and when you draft, because they don't know about the air.
Power meters have come down in price. Drastically. PowerTap hubs are reliable and hard to break, sometimes used ones go as low as $100.0 -
Yeah maybe a power meter is the way to go. Good excuse to get one for time trials which funny enough I'm on my way to one now 😂1
-
Good luck in the TT!
I mostly use my PM as a pacing tool and for intervals. Calories are the icing on the cake.0 -
NorthCascades wrote: »Good luck in the TT!
I mostly use my PM as a pacing tool and for intervals. Calories are the icing on the cake.
10mile PB so that's a plus point 👍🏼 I'll have a look at the PMs 💪🏻1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions