Opinion? Weight x 11 = calories

Many trainers have told me to take my body weight, multiply by 11 and that's the calories you should eat. As you lose, you adjust.
MFP says I need 1200 and a trainer tells me 1452.
Can anyone verify this?

Add me if your all about proper nutrition and doing things the right way!

Replies

  • Naturally_Monica
    Naturally_Monica Posts: 335 Member
    I just did this and got 1,694. MFP told me 1,560 calories to lose a pound a week. This is my second time back, but I trust MFP’s numbers because they have always been accurate for weight loss (depending if i lost 1 pound, 1.5, etc.)
  • MikePTY
    MikePTY Posts: 3,814 Member
    I never heard of that before. While that rough estimate may get in the ball park for some people, it is not really accurate, as it doesn't include a lot of factors. MFP's estimate includes your weight, height, gender, age, activity level, and the rate of which you want to lose weight, all of which factor into your goal, not simply weight.

    How much weight are you telling MFP that you want to lose per week? If you are setting too aggressive a goal, that is why you are getting 1200. Based on your stats, you should aim for no more than 1/2 to 1 pound per week of loss. Plus MFP is designed for you to eat your exercise calories back, so make sure to do that as well.
  • jessalittlemore
    jessalittlemore Posts: 65 Member
    edited May 2019
    No offense, but this seems oversimplified and like it wouldn't work at all for those of us who are obese. With this math I "should" eat over 1000 more calories a day, which I'm pretty sure would destroy my weight loss.
  • MarvinsFitLife
    MarvinsFitLife Posts: 874 Member
    @abetteryou082807 try this link
    https://www.calculator.net/calorie-calculator.html
    If it’s close to what your trainer recommends I would use this calculator
  • pilia13
    pilia13 Posts: 3 Member
    I would think that number is to maintain current weight, not lose.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    I'm sure it could work for some people but it doesn't take height, activity or exercise into account. If I used that my deficit would be way too steep.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    pilia13 wrote: »
    I would think that number is to maintain current weight, not lose.

    That would be ultra depressing if that were the case.
  • Panini911
    Panini911 Posts: 2,325 Member
    edited May 2019
    So does the 11 reflect a certain exercise/activity level? height?

    If not then how can these two people eat the same number of calories and maintain?
    - sedentary 5'1 115lb woman (let's say walks a max of 3000 steps a day, no purposeful exercise)
    - 5'7 115lb woman training for a marathon

    Both would get 115*11= 1265 calories

    ETA: MFP gave you 1200 based on your height, activity level, gender and specifically the rate of loss you selected. if you go for a fast rate of loss it's drop your calories fast. It also DOES NOT account for purposeful exercise. So if you go to gym, go for a run, whatever purposeful exercise, MFP is desgined for you to eat those calories back (to maintain your requested rate of loss/maintenance)
  • Commander_Keen
    Commander_Keen Posts: 1,179 Member
    Many trainers have told me to take my body weight, multiply by 11 and that's the calories you should eat. As you lose, you adjust.
    MFP says I need 1200 and a trainer tells me 1452.
    Can anyone verify this?

    Add me if your all about proper nutrition and doing things the right way!

    Sooooo, A TV Doctor said, multiple your current weight X10 to get your current calories to maintain.

    What do you want to do.. What is your goal.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    Many trainers have told me to take my body weight, multiply by 11 and that's the calories you should eat. As you lose, you adjust.
    MFP says I need 1200 and a trainer tells me 1452.
    Can anyone verify this?

    Add me if your all about proper nutrition and doing things the right way!

    MFP tells you 1200 plus to eat back what you burn from exercsie. and it only told you 1200 based on your weekly weight loss goal..
    what did you pick as your weekly weight loss goal?
    How much do you have to lose?

    As an example say MFP gives you 1450 calories to lose 1 lb/week, and you plan on exercising 5x/week for an average of 400 cals per workout. well MFP will tell you to eat 1450 on the days you don't workout and 1850 on the days you do whereas a "professional" or TDEE calculator may tell you to eat 1700 every day regardless if you workout.

    So for the week MFP will have you eat 12,150 (1450*2+1850*5) whereas doing it the other way will have you eat 11,900 (1700*7) almost the same number of cals for the week (250 dif). The issue in not following MFP is if you don't work out the full 5 days or burn more or less than planned. If that is the case you may lose more or less than your goal, whereas MFP will have you lose your goal amount regardless of how much you actually workout.

    What many MFPers do is take the low 1450 and not eat back exercise calories which is wrong, if you are not eating them back then your daily activity level should reflect the higher burn with would be covered in the 1700/day above.

    Here is a good reference, if you have over 100 lbs to lose you can lose more than 2 lbs/week safely, that being said it is best to set a realistic safe weekly loss goal and:
    If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
    If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    Many trainers have told me to take my body weight, multiply by 11 and that's the calories you should eat. As you lose, you adjust.
    MFP says I need 1200 and a trainer tells me 1452.
    Can anyone verify this?

    Add me if your all about proper nutrition and doing things the right way!

    Sooooo, A TV Doctor said, multiple your current weight X10 to get your current calories to maintain.

    What do you want to do.. What is your goal.

    That is so far off... that may be close to BMR, not maintenance.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    pilia13 wrote: »
    I would think that number is to maintain current weight, not lose.

    Nope, my maintenance at 160lbs is well over 2,000 cals, not 1760. I am losing on 1900+exercise cals
  • Mouse_Potato
    Mouse_Potato Posts: 1,509 Member
    I think that's to calculate BMR. I got 1287 and my BMR is somewhere around there. My TDEE, however, is closer to 2100.
  • thanos5
    thanos5 Posts: 513 Member
    @abetteryou082807 try this link
    https://www.calculator.net/calorie-calculator.html
    If it’s close to what your trainer recommends I would use this calculator

    thanks for the link!
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    I've seen that a few times but it's a really silly way to guestimate when there are far better methods available.

    It takes no account of age, gender, activity or exercise. So a same weight young male with a highly active job doing a load of exercise on top of that would get same calorie allowance as an elderly female who does no exercise. Doesn't seem sensible does it??!!

    By the way my maintenance calories are roughly 19 to 20 multiple of my weight.