Low cal or keto? That's the question!

Options
I'm just starting and have 100+ lbs to lose. Which will help me lose weight faster? Which is easier to maintain? Right now I'm doing low cal and am on the track to lose 3 lbs per week. Thanks y'all!
«1

Replies

  • appledawn0422
    appledawn0422 Posts: 31 Member
    Options
    fdhunt1 wrote: »
    You're asking a very open ended question. The short answer is BOTH low cal and keto work. It really depends on your goals and tolerances. If you are the type of person who can live with restricted carbohydrate intake, keto is the way to go - many side benefits in addition to weight loss. However, if you can't give up the carbs ( pasta, bread, potatoes, starches in general) then by all means go with calories in vs calories out (CICO) and maintain a doable deficit.

    Just a comment in general, I think your target of 3 lbs /wk may be expecting too much. The norm is usually .5 to 1 lb/wk. You say you have 100+ lbs to lose, so it won't happen overnight. You must be patient no matter what course you chose, this is a journey that will come with ups and downs. Also, make smart choices on food. Chose real food and steer clear of processed foods and those specified for "diets". Most contain a lot of other stuff that is not beneficial to your task.

    I am not an expert or a guru on this site. There are others much smarter and knowledgeable. Personally, I too have a lot of weight to lose and chose the keto way of eating because I have other goals in addition to weight loss. I am insulin resistant and keto provides the mechanism to get my insulin/glucose levels under control. It also provides great mental clarity and reduced cravings and hunger pangs.

    Whichever way you choose, best of luck to you.

    Thank you. Right now I am doing low cal and I eat brown rice, overnight oats and berries but no refined breads or sugars. So I'm lower carb than ever but still don't fit into the keto or even low carb category. I eat between 50-70 carbs per day. My calorie intake has been around the 1200 mark. Give or take 200!
    3 lbs per week isn't my target so much as according to my calorie intake and exercise as of the last few days....it's my projected weight loss if that makes sense?
    I guess I'm just trying to find out what works for other people to see if what I'm doing is my best option. Thank you for your insight!
  • appledawn0422
    appledawn0422 Posts: 31 Member
    Options
    Panini911 wrote: »
    weight loss is about eating at a calorie deficit consistently over time. you can do that eating whatever.

    which is "easier" is the one that keeps you full and satisfied and best able to eat at a calorie deficit over a longer period of time and even stick to a balance of calories in/out during "maintenance". and is completely personal. what works great for one person is a nightmare to another.

    You can also START with low carb and see if that works for you. if so then experiment with going even lower carb/keto. you may also find carbs keep you full and happy on the long run and opt to bring more carbs back on board and stick only to calorie deficit (or stick to "just" low carb")

    The one thing is lowering your carb intake will often lead to a larger INITIAL drop of water weight but over time that will even out to other methods of weight loss for loss over time. and that water weight would just come back on if you opt off low carb/keto anyway.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants/p1

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10636388/free-customized-personal-weight-loss-eating-plan-not-spam-or-mlm/p1

    That's very true. I have already started and am doing low cal. I watch my carb intake but still eat brown rice, oatmeal, and fruit. Nothing refined or white. I'm just wondering if one works better than the other for extreme amounts of weight to lose? Thank you!!
  • appledawn0422
    appledawn0422 Posts: 31 Member
    Options
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The only way Keto works is if it is low calorie. You may find it controls your appetite better, and that helps you reduce calories easier than non-keto, but the principle is still the same regardless of how you do it: eat less than you burn to lose weight.

    Personally, I've been able to lose weight fine without doing Keto, so I've had no reason to do a restrictive diet that would cause me to cut out very many foods I enjoy and that are nutritious. Plus fats don't really fill me, but carbs do. But everyone is different.

    I will add that weight loss is not about "faster". It's about doing it sustainably in a way that is healthy and safe, and that will teach you good habits to maintain your weight loss once you have it. If you do Keto, you better like doing Keto, and want to keep doing it for a long period or time. Or else how will you have the tools to maintain your weight loss if you just do it for a little while and then go back to a normal diet? That doesn't build tools for a successful maintainence of weight loss.

    I think I'm going to stick with counting my calories. I enjoy my overnight oats and brown rice and FRUIT. LOL. As long as I'm seeing results....I'm gonna keep on with what I'm doing. Thanks so much for your input!
  • Panini911
    Panini911 Posts: 2,325 Member
    Options
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    Options
    As noted above, keto works because for some people it makes it easier to stick to their deficit calorie level and for some they naturally eat less (although sometimes this is due to cutting out foods they tended to overeat and can be short term as they find new foods to overeat).

    The calorie level you eat to lose isn't different on low carb/keto vs. other ways of losing.

    What makes people feel satiated differs from person to person -- I'd say if not struggling with your current way of eating then no need to cut way down on carbs (many of which can be great sources of nutrients).

    I would be careful not to cut cals too low.
  • LyndaBSS
    LyndaBSS Posts: 6,964 Member
    Options
    I researched keto and realized that the macros just didn't fit for me. I'm now researching a plant based diet with some fish and eggs. I'm sure there's a proper name for that.

    In the meantime, I'm following the macros given when I joined MFP and am very happy with my results so far.

    If I'm planning on going forward with any plan as a lifestyle, it's got to be sustainable.

    Choose wisely. :)
  • Kalex1975
    Kalex1975 Posts: 427 Member
    Options
    LyndaBSS wrote: »
    I'm now researching a plant based diet with some fish and eggs. I'm sure there's a proper name for that.

    ^ pescatarian

  • puffbrat
    puffbrat Posts: 2,806 Member
    Options
    just_Tomek wrote: »
    The way of eating that you can stick to long-term is the best way to lose weight for you.

    pc2koe1i68n0.jpg

    No way. Not a chance. Keto trumps all this.

    No way. Not a chance. Not for me or many people.

    OP - like Panini said, the best one is the one that helps you stay on track and develop habits to allow you to be successful long term. Whether that is low carb or keto is up to you. For me personally, it is neither. I eat the same things I always have, just in lower quantity. I do find that making sure to hit my fat, protein, and fiber goals keeps me satiated longer and subsequently keeps my carbs lower than I naturally tend toward. But I don't eat in a way that even remotely resembles low carb.

    Regardless of what you select, it is still important to ensure that you don't undereat and lose weight too quickly.
  • LyndaBSS
    LyndaBSS Posts: 6,964 Member
    Options
    Kalex1975 wrote: »
    LyndaBSS wrote: »
    I'm now researching a plant based diet with some fish and eggs. I'm sure there's a proper name for that.

    ^ pescatarian

    If I tell my family that, they'll ask if it's curable. 😂

    Thanks!
  • shellymcellyme
    shellymcellyme Posts: 1 Member
    Options
    my body does not like the high fat with keto- hard to process it. I'm trying to pursue low carb and clean eating option. One thing for me... if it try to take on too many 'rules' I get overwhelmed and it gives me a reason to quit/fail.


  • try2again
    try2again Posts: 3,562 Member
    Options
    Don't focus on what will help you lose weight faster so much as the way of eating you can stick with for the long haul. It will, and should, take a long time to lose 100 lbs, and maintenance will take forever, so do what's comfortable. Very few women would find 1200 calories comfortable for the duration.

    https://www.aworkoutroutine.com/1200-calorie-diet/
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,442 Member
    Options
    just_Tomek wrote: »
    The way of eating that you can stick to long-term is the best way to lose weight for you.

    pc2koe1i68n0.jpg

    No way. Not a chance. Keto trumps all this.

    How do you figure?
  • LyndaBSS
    LyndaBSS Posts: 6,964 Member
    Options
    Must be a macrobiologist in disguise. 😎