Working out too much?

Hello, thanks for reading. I think I’ve hit a plateau and I’m not sure where to go from here. I work out for two hours 5-6 days a week. I like to burn 600-700 calories during a workout. I usually do cardio and weight training. Some days I run 3-6 miles before weights, some days I do sprints and jump rope between weight lifting sets. I’ve eaten really clean pretty consistently. No junk, no alcohol, trying to stay around 1500 calories. The scale and the tape measure will not budge. Could I be working out too much? Not eating enough? I’ve read so many articles and there is so much conflicting information. Any insight would be appreciated! Thanks

Replies

  • MelanieCN77
    MelanieCN77 Posts: 4,047 Member
    How are you measuring your calories and food intake, and also the workout burn?
  • aokoye
    aokoye Posts: 3,495 Member
    What's your current height and weight? Additionally how many pounds are you trying to lose a week and do you weight the food you eat?
  • tllincoln
    tllincoln Posts: 14 Member
    I weigh all my food on a food scale, eat lean meats and complex carbs. I’m 37, 5’2” and 140 pounds. I have an athletic build, trying to get a little leaner while keeping some muscle. I used to strictly run and stayed around 125, then I got injured and started running less and weight lifting more. I know some of my weight is definitely muscle, but Some of it is also stubborn fat. I also have an Apple Watch and track my calories on that. Thanks for replying!
  • warukimedesu
    warukimedesu Posts: 27 Member
    tllincoln wrote: »
    I weigh all my food on a food scale, eat lean meats and complex carbs. I’m 37, 5’2” and 140 pounds. I have an athletic build, trying to get a little leaner while keeping some muscle. I used to strictly run and stayed around 125, then I got injured and started running less and weight lifting more. I know some of my weight is definitely muscle, but Some of it is also stubborn fat. I also have an Apple Watch and track my calories on that. Thanks for replying!

    That must be it, at least to a certain degree. According to the Body Recomposition megathread and other sources, getting leaner at the same weight takes time.

    Another possibility is that you're really not deep into a calorie deficit. If you do mostly weights than cardio, then, maybe 600-700 for exercise calories is an overestimation. Is 1500 net calories? Do you think you can go a bit lower than that?
  • tllincoln
    tllincoln Posts: 14 Member
    Thanks! I have some pretty intense workouts. I try to keep my heart rate up between sets with sprints or jump roping, and i always warm up by running a mile then end with running or HIIT. That’s why i asked if maybe i am doing too much cardio. Everything i read says to give a change a month (change in macros, change in workouts, etc) so maybe I’ll try eating more, which scare me a little, and doing more HIIT on weight days and less weight on steady state days.. thanks again!
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,421 Member
    You don't really have a lot of weight to lose.

    It's going to be very slow.

    How long has it been since you saw any drop in weight? It's common to have weeks with no changes, especially for women.

  • kevinflemming1982
    kevinflemming1982 Posts: 158 Member
    Ah, I'm mostly cycling and weight training. Never been much of a runner.

    I'll stretch a little first. I don't count the time it takes for that, as it's just loosening-up. 10 min stationary cycle on the second-to-last setting at an average of +25kph, to get my pulse racing a little. Then a 25-30min cycle on the MTB (got a couple of good routes now, which have various grades). Finishing with a couple sets of 10 with various weight training exercises, either when I get back or after a rest (usually knackered because of the current heat lol).

    Sometimes I might get up to an hour, if I feel I can do more weights in the afternoon, but rarely go over that. Seems to be working so far, at least for me. We're all different, I guess. There are some who will give the old cardio vs. weights argument, but I don't think either is better than the other. They can both aid with weight loss. It's just finding something that works for you.

    Change it up each month? Hmm, I'll have a look at that, should I find it becomes a chore after the next month. Still quite early into my goals, but I'll remember that. Thank you also!
  • nowine4me
    nowine4me Posts: 3,985 Member
    Are you taking a proper rest day?
    Are you drinking lots and lots of water?
    Are you getting enough sleep?
    There is more to the equation than CICO
  • tllincoln
    tllincoln Posts: 14 Member
    nowine4me wrote: »
    Are you taking a proper rest day?
    Are you drinking lots and lots of water?
    Are you getting enough sleep?
    There is more to the equation than CICO
    Yes, you are so right!! I try my best to get in all of the above. Falling short some days (especially sleep). I’m a nurse who works 13 hour shifts with two boys at home with so.much.energy!! But I’m trying to be more mindful of sleep and rest. I usually “rest” on two of my 3 work shifts. Some weeks I don’t workout at all before work though. Just depends on how early I get to bed.
  • Nottaway1
    Nottaway1 Posts: 26 Member
    Sounds like a little overtraining... cortisol release? Could you lower carbs, increase protein... then hold workouts to 1 hour... see what happens.
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    You don't really have a lot of weight to lose.

    It's going to be very slow.

    How long has it been since you saw any drop in weight? It's common to have weeks with no changes, especially for women.

    QFT
  • kevinflemming1982
    kevinflemming1982 Posts: 158 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    QFT
    Quantum Field Theory?
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    QFT
    Quantum Field Theory?

    Quoted for truth.

    OP is already at a healthy weight, is very active, and is a woman. Water weight fluctuations could easily be hiding fat loss on the scale for weeks at a time.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,269 Member
    Maybe you're losing fat and building muscle at the same time. Do you feel that you're getting leaner?

    Possible, but both would be happening very, very slowly.

    For a woman like OP, under ideal circumstances (but without performance-enhancing drugs), a quarter pound of muscle-mass gain per week would be a really good result (half a pound for a male). Ideal circumstances include relative youth, good genetics, a well-designed progressive weight training program, good nutrition including adequate protein, and a calorie surplus.

    A quarter pound a week of fat loss would be about the slowest loss rate one could perceive, and that probably only with a weight-trending app used over a period of quite a few weeks. It would represent a calorie deficit of about 125 calories daily, a deficit so small it would be difficult to hit precisely because of the unavoidable error factors in tracking. (Note: I'm not saying such a small deficit can't happen. I'm saying it probably can't be accurately targeted/tracked with precision.)

    Note that increasing strength doesn't necessarily mean muscle mass is increasing; neuromuscular adaptation, especially in relative beginners, is a potentially quite quick cause of strength gain. (Neuromuscular adaptation is essentially better recruitment and utilization of existing muscle fibers.) Neither is appearance improvement necessarily an indication of muscle mass increase. Sometimes people are deceived into thinking they're gaining muscle mass faster than realistic, based on signficantly improved strength, a bit of muscle fullness from the water retention, and related improvements to appearance.

    I wish it were so easy to gain muscle mass that it could mask fat loss at any reasonable rate! Unfortunately, if anything is masking fat loss on the scale, it's usually either water weight or changes in average digestive contents.
  • TrishSeren
    TrishSeren Posts: 587 Member
    Apple watch calorie burns aren't accurate, they can be up to 30% out so don't rely 100% on what it says you've burnt.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    Apparently, there is a better chance of losing more weight if you only workout for 30 minutes per day, than if you did more (source: Google). I do an average of 30-45 minutes per day, but give it some beans and get a proper sweat going.

    Only possible if you are leaving something major out. Please provide an actual link. Google is a search engine, not a source :)
  • HoneyBadger302
    HoneyBadger302 Posts: 2,075 Member
    Exercise won't halt your ability to lose fat - you may have body composition issues and/or appetite/hunger issues if you're not fueling yourself properly. There are plenty of sources for macro breakdowns, but there's also a little bit of what your body wants/needs which the fine tuning can take some experimenting.

    Not eating enough while working out tends to lower your TDEE in small ways, little things that add up over time, which is why people get the impression they aren't "eating enough" to lose weight. Over training without proper fuel means your body and mind start to conserve energy in other ways by reducing tiny, small activities and movements you may not even notice you are no longer doing.

    Chances are you're over estimating your burn or your tracking is off. It's not hard to miss a few hundred calories a day in tracking - a nibble of this, an extra small taste of that, an overflowing teaspoon of those and pretty soon, the small deficit someone your size/activity should have disappears. Add in slightly off burn numbers, and you could easily be at maintenance or just barely in a deficit, which can be VERY hard to track over time without several other tools in your pocket.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    tllincoln wrote: »
    I weigh all my food on a food scale, eat lean meats and complex carbs. I’m 37, 5’2” and 140 pounds. I have an athletic build, trying to get a little leaner while keeping some muscle. I used to strictly run and stayed around 125, then I got injured and started running less and weight lifting more. I know some of my weight is definitely muscle, but Some of it is also stubborn fat. I also have an Apple Watch and track my calories on that. Thanks for replying!

    Remember your watch cannot measure calories.

    It can very roughly estimate energy use by using other metrics and then making a series of assumptions but that rough estimate can be miles away from reality.

    Your routine does sound very hit and miss though - the idea of lifting is not to wear yourself out between lifts, would suggest stop trying to just burn more calories and think of the quality of your training and the return on the effort you put in, that doesn't mean panting for breath all the time!

    Could you be over-training? Maybe.
    (Which can affect your scale weight through water retention, but won't affect your rate of underlying fat loss if your logging is accurate and you are in a true deficit.)
    The way to find out would be to have a couple of easy weeks.