WW or Calories In, Calories Out?!
leosmama44
Posts: 1 Member
Did you find success in calorie counting or WW? Which program do you prefer and why?
0
Replies
-
What is WW?
Calories are just one component of a bigger picture. It's like saying "driving slower will make you a safer driver." It's "not wrong" but there's a deeper story around being a reliably safe driver.
If you are strictly just counting calories, with no regard for nutrient density, hormonal responses, inflammatory foods, keeping your metabolism guessing, etc. etc. you probably won't do well. Some people get lucky. And of course I'm not saying you have to know EVERYTHING immediately to make progress, but you need to begin knowing that the story gets detailed, and learn what you can when you can.3 -
Calorie counting.
Your title's a bit off, btw. Calories In Calories Out (CICO) is an equation, not a diet. ALL diets are backed by CICO. At the end of the day, if you're in deficit, you lose; if you're in surplus, you gain; if you're in equilibrium, you maintain*. Whether you count calories, count points, eat certain foods, eliminate certain foods, stick to an eating window, graze, exercise, don't exercise, etc etc., it's all CICO.
I've done some earlier iterations of Weight Watchers, but I think that their expanded zero-point foods muddy the waters too much. I can totally end up in surplus eating the stuff on this list: https://www.weightwatchers.com/us/blog/weight-loss/complete-zero-point-foods-list (Cannelini beans? Basic staple. Ditto eggs, edamame, tofu...) Calories count whether you count them or not. It just makes more sense to me to count them directly instead of getting the issue clouded by points that get more and more disconnected from calories with each new program rollout.
*Over time; weight loss isn't linear; yadda yadda yadda.22 -
I started with WW because I actually FOUND an entire Weight Watchers starter kit in a box of free stuff outside a second hand store. I did that for the 4 months that the starter kit covers, filled the food journal, tracked my progress, and did great. I kept on that for probably another two with my own notebook, then when my weight loss started to slow down I switched to calorie counting instead because of what estherdragon mentioned. I didn't like all the zero point foods, some of them were high in calories. I wanted to do a better job of tracking my food, so here I am. But Weight Watchers was my starting point, it made it easy. It taught me to log my food, and showed me that I *could* lose weight. So for that, I can't knock it. I think they both have their places and WW is a great place to start if calories and macros seems a bit daunting at first.6
-
It's all down to life style and personal choice, I view WW as a faddy diet (free foods, points erc) and not something that seems to be sustainable. I do CICO and although I'm counting calories nothing is out of bounds in moderation, it's something that "I" feel I could do long term.
However, I also attend a fitness class with a weigh in option and I think this is where WW would work as I'm more accountable - I want to see a loss not a gain so find I'm more focused.
There's nothing stopping you taking advantage of the support network WW offers and using MFP too to count calories.5 -
I like counting calories, once you get used to what calories are in your favourite foods it's pretty easy. I like the fact that i can have whatever I fancy. it works for my kind of emotional eating, in the past if I ate one chocolate I would feel guilty and eat with wild abandon the rest of the day, making bad food choices! Now I just think well that is 60 calories off my daily allowance so it's made me choose healthier food the rest of the time. I like greens (broccoli, spinach, asparagus, cabbage, courgette) a lot and you can have a whole lot of those! I also really like salad so make big salads and just add a dessert spoon of a really good olive oil and some apple cider vinegar. Also I was amazed to see how low in calories ham was for eg in comparison to a lamb chop! And I love the way the next day it all resets and I have 1200 cals to work with again! I find it fun. I have had great success with low carb in the past but it doesn't work for me anymore, I am not sure why, maybe it's hormonal but I just don't like it or feel good on it. Sorry haven't actually spoken about WW here I realise. I have done that in the past as well and it didn't work for me but can see how it does for others.4
-
I did WW about 10 years ago & lost about 30lbs in approx 6 months but like others have mentioned above with some of WW “zero” points items is ridiculous. I now do CICO as it’s the most trustworthy way cause everything that goes into my mouth I have to account for. It’s like someone giving me £2000 a day & I can spend it on what ever I choose to as long as I don’t go over my budget! That’s how I see my daily calorie amount.6
-
Calorie counting. Zero points for anything is vastly illogical and I believe it sets people up for failure.6
-
it all comes back to how many calories you consume and staying within a deficit from your maintenance calories (MFP method). the real question is, will you have long term success with "insert diet plan here" . I don't see a point system as something that is sustainable for me or any diet that puts restrictions on what you can eat, LIKE KETO or CARNIVORE, VEGAN ETC..1
-
So, actually, there is no "either/or" It is a "Whatever works for you" as long as it doesn't harm you more than necessary.
17 -
I had success in the past with WW, but when they switched to zero point foods, I ran into trouble - it stopped working for me. I need the discipline of counting calories, and didn't learn that until I went on noom, which is calorie counting plus more. Noom expired, so now I'm using MFP to monitor my calories throughout the day. I try to plan ahead, so if I know that dinner out is coming up, lunch needs to be light that day. I've lost 20 lbs in about 6 months, so counting everything clearly works!1
-
I would start with CICO,it's free(buy a food scale).. Actually,I would get a complete checkup at the Dr. 1st,to make sure that you don't have any hormonal or blood issues.
I didn't know for YEARS that I had Pcos,so my eating plan has to reflect that or,I'll struggle more than necessary.
Build muscle..I lose weight fast,now that I've found my groove,but when I build muscle,I look better in clostes and I don't regain as fast,when I'm slipping up.
As far as WW,I think that it's a good program for accountability,to have people to share in your journey. My friends and family aren't interested is discuss ing anything health related,so I found it good for that...I had a Saturday routine..We weigh in,gym,shop for healthy food,then meal prep...As far as the 'zero foods',they are counted in the 'total',some people just try to take advantage and wonder,why the scale won't move...It was suggested to eat a serving or 2,of the Zero foods,not gorge...If I were a binge eater,I wouldn't do WW.. because I might take advantage of how the program works.
Lastly,try different approaches to see what works for YOU! You will get very different answers on here.
I lost MOST of my weight on Keto, before Keto was a thing..it helped with my migraines and was recommended for my PCOS,but I can't eat that way everyday..Not because I don't think it's healthy,but because I don't like meat that much...So,find YOUR balance,and good luck!??
0 -
I'm currently using both because I'm trying to get a handle on portion control and recognizing hunger signals. I'm enjoying the new WW because the focus is more on altering how I view food and its place in my life. It's true, CICO is basic science. But for me, I need to learn more than just counting calories. I need to be educated enough to make good choices when I can't log and stop the love/hate relationship with food.3
-
WW runs on the same principle as calorie counting does on MFP. I did WW in the early 2000's before MFP was around. I left just after they introduced the zero points food which I thought was a bit stupid. It was just a marketing ploy, in my opinion, to get us all to buy new books etc and I didn't want to continue as I had already learnt enough to carry on without paying to be a member. It was useful though as it taught me a lot about healthy food and was the best support I could find before MFP came around. Once MFP was created I joined and applied what I learnt in WW (about choosing a balanced diet etc) but the counting is the same only MFP uses calories directly. WW uses points but they are just calories that have been given points. I've found success in both to answer your question.0
-
kwest_4_fitness wrote: »I'm currently using both because I'm trying to get a handle on portion control and recognizing hunger signals. I'm enjoying the new WW because the focus is more on altering how I view food and its place in my life. It's true, CICO is basic science. But for me, I need to learn more than just counting calories. I need to be educated enough to make good choices when I can't log and stop the love/hate relationship with food.
WW "education" changes every few years though. They need to keep the program fresh to sell the product (again and again). Unfortunately it's marketing driven, not science driven.
Oprah's "I can even eat bread".....well duh. The problem I have with the current plan is foods are demonized. I can have chocolate (or bread) everyday, but I have to pay much more for that in points than the calories are worth. I shouldn't have to under eat (calorie wise) to include a piece of chocolate in my diet.
Don't get me wrong, the weigh-ins and support do help some people.6 -
I've had success with both. I did very well with WW at first and there were a things I did like about it, but I could almost exactly echo TeaBea's comments. I hated that it was all about selling stuff, and in the end I quit because as they changed the program they demonized sugar and fat. I felt like I was punished for eating any dessert. I find calorie counting far more sustainable for me, because I don't have to almost entirely cut out the things I love.1
-
kwest_4_fitness wrote: »I'm currently using both because I'm trying to get a handle on portion control and recognizing hunger signals. I'm enjoying the new WW because the focus is more on altering how I view food and its place in my life. It's true, CICO is basic science. But for me, I need to learn more than just counting calories. I need to be educated enough to make good choices when I can't log and stop the love/hate relationship with food.
WW "education" changes every few years though. They need to keep the program fresh to sell the product (again and again). Unfortunately it's marketing driven, not science driven.
Oprah's "I can even eat bread".....well duh. The problem I have with the current plan is foods are demonized. I can have chocolate (or bread) everyday, but I have to pay much more for that in points than the calories are worth. I shouldn't have to under eat (calorie wise) to include a piece of chocolate in my diet.
Don't get me wrong, the weigh-ins and support do help some people.
Exactly this. If WW is so effective, why the heck do they keep changing it?1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions
Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!