Calorie restriction, fitness and longevity.
Options
Mellouk89
Posts: 469 Member
So according to this article, calorie restriction is good for longevity, leads to less inflammation and a better immune system. But can you restrict calorie for a long period of time while still maintaining a healthy physique, meaning a decent amount of muscles and reasonable body fat? How can you eat under maintenance chronically and not eventually become too skinny/underweight, does your body adapt?
https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/calorie-restriction.amp.html
https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/calorie-restriction.amp.html
0
Replies
-
I am all about it. The name of the game is caloric restriction for life, with optimal nutrition. Eventually you stabilize, but on a much smaller body frame, and in bonus, superb blood pressure like 110/70, a low BPM of 55 at rest, not forgetting a low total cholesterol if you keep your proteins at 15-20%. Even when aging. It is important to get active.
The downside of doing so is that if you get an infectious disease, you are likely to die quicker. Although the article says otherwise for the covid-19. It is possible that they mean that you are less likely to get the infection, at the first place.
At the same time, some studies suggest that proteins restrictions bring the same kind of improvements in health markers. I can see some people grimacing here.
2 -
Ok and also my question was can still maintain a decent amount of muscle mass while calorie restricting chronically?0
-
No I mean in humans.0
-
Ok and also my question was can still maintain a decent amount of muscle mass while calorie restricting chronically?
If chronically means no more than -30%, in my experience, yes. As long you exercise with intensity, strenght-style. You'll have less muscles because you'll need less, with a smaller body frame. By no mean to the point of being weak, to the contrary. About all studies point to the fact that the subjects become more youthful, nimble, agile and vigourous.
If you want to be a body-builder, it is probably another story, I don't know.
0 -
Firstly, what is a "Normal" diet for a rat, surely by definition a rat in the wild would experience calorie restrictions on a fairly regular basis, some days finding more food than other days. Captive rats however would be being fed the same amount of calories on a regular basis. So to turn it on it's head is it being captive and fed regularly that is shortening the rats life rather than calorie restrictions prolonging it?
Then again a study has shown that I have no idea what I am talking about most of the time due to the amount of calories I consume from alcohol
5 -
I am all about it. The name of the game is caloric restriction for life, with optimal nutrition. Eventually you stabilize, but on a much smaller body frame, and in bonus, superb blood pressure like 110/70, a low BPM of 55 at rest, not forgetting a low total cholesterol if you keep your proteins at 15-20%. Even when aging. It is important to get active.
The downside of doing so is that if you get an infectious disease, you are likely to die quicker. Although the article says otherwise for the covid-19. It is possible that they mean that you are less likely to get the infection, at the first place.
At the same time, some studies suggest that proteins restrictions bring the same kind of improvements in health markers. I can see some people grimacing here.
So basically everything that typically comes with losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight. And the notion that this somehow protects you against COVID-19 is ridiculous. A strong immunity system isn't going to protect and novel strain of virus for which there is no inherent immunity because our systems have never seen this virus strain before.9 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
So basically everything that typically comes with losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight.
Just maintaining an healthy weight according to the recommended ranges won't do that. You have to be more aggressive than that and aim for closer to the lower limit.0 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
So basically everything that typically comes with losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight.
Just maintaining an healthy weight according to the recommended ranges won't do that. You have to be more aggressive than that and aim for closer to the lower limit.
How did you determine that these benefits aren't available to those who are maintaining a healthy body weight?9 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
So basically everything that typically comes with losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight.
Just maintaining an healthy weight according to the recommended ranges won't do that. You have to be more aggressive than that and aim for closer to the lower limit.
Then how come I have all of those benefits? How come there are like a gazillion people on here who have those benefits without starving themselves down to the lowest end of BMI? Seriously? I must be a magical unicorn. At the lower end of BMI I would be emaciated and would have to also burn up a lot of muscle mass, which is in and of itself unhealthy.
Utter nonsense...8 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
So basically everything that typically comes with losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight.
Just maintaining an healthy weight according to the recommended ranges won't do that. You have to be more aggressive than that and aim for closer to the lower limit.
Then how come I have all of those benefits? How come there are like a gazillion people on here who have those benefits without starving themselves down to the lowest end of BMI? Seriously? I must be a magical unicorn. At the lower end of BMI I would be emaciated and would have to also burn up a lot of muscle mass, which is in and of itself unhealthy.
Utter nonsense...
And why do I have those benefits and I am right at the line of crossing over from obese BMI to overweight? My BP averages 105/65. My RHR is 48. My inflammation markers are now in normal range. On my last visit to the doctor he was practically doing cartwheels down the hall over my blood results.
I am not terribly interested in longevity. I have seen too many end up in a "better off dead" state of mental or physical health. I am definitely in the quality over quantity camp.5 -
To begin with, I thought the adaptation range was at 20%, not 30%.
Your ability to fight off injury and infection and to recover from same or to perform at optimal athletic ability within your constrains will be negatively impacted.
You're more likely, not less, to get a cold, flu, or pneumonia, so why that would increase your (by definition of novel) nonexistent covid-19 resistance is baffling.
You may or may not be as likely to get some forms of cancer. Probably less likely to have high blood pressure related issues and heart disease. You may or may not be able to survive better or as long if you do get cancer.
Overall, there is no free lunch and very questionable (if any) benefits and some identifiable detriments over normal weight normal maintenance.
So for now... I pass.8 -
So your body will adapt that's what I wanted to know, I think 20% is reasonable but I wouldn't go further than that. I don't think it would make me miserable I feel satieted most of the time.0
-
So your body will adapt that's what I wanted to know, I think 20% is reasonable but I wouldn't go further than that. I don't think it would make me miserable I feel satieted most of the time.
20% may be something to adapt to, or something you don't adapt to and continue to lose on. You have no way of knowing ahead of time. You will certainly NOT "adapt" to it, if it continues to be a 20% off of whatever your then current maintenance is, so you may want to view it as a 10% or what have you below your CURRENT maintenance. Assuming you're not already at the low end of normal weight.
he chances of you ending up malnourished are actually quite high. The chances that slower cellular repair will lead to problems before it leads to longevity is also not zero. Feeling cold continuously (and extremely cold hands and feet to the point of seeing color changes) are also a good chance as your core temperature drops a bit as part of the adaptation. Feeling tired and listless possible too! Hair loss. A lot depends on starting weight of course. Where on the weight continuum you're currently located.3 -
Ok I made this thread in part because my calorie intake is quite low and I maintain my current weight that way. I think it's because I eat energy dense foods with not a lot of fiber and moderate protein. It may be that I don't burn as much energy digesting these foods thus I can sustain myself with lower calories?0
-
Ok I made this thread in part because my calorie intake is quite low and I maintain my current weight that way. I think it's because I eat energy dense foods with not a lot of fiber and moderate protein. It may be that I don't burn as much energy digesting these foods thus I can sustain myself with lower calories?
How active are you currently? How long have you been maintaining? How much lower is your intake than a TDEE estimate for your stats?3 -
Ok I made this thread in part because my calorie intake is quite low and I maintain my current weight that way. I think it's because I eat energy dense foods with not a lot of fiber and moderate protein. It may be that I don't burn as much energy digesting these foods thus I can sustain myself with lower calories?
That just means you are eating maintenance. What happens with those doing the 20% deficit thing (CRON/calorie restriction/optimal nutrition) is they initially lose and then stabilize at a lower body weight. They are trying to lower their TDEE through a combination of weight loss and adaptation to lower cals. (The latter, which most losing weight see as a negative, is actually a goal.)
Of course the "optimal nutrition" part usually means lots of veg, and so not low fiber at all.6 -
Ok I made this thread in part because my calorie intake is quite low and I maintain my current weight that way. I think it's because I eat energy dense foods with not a lot of fiber and moderate protein. It may be that I don't burn as much energy digesting these foods thus I can sustain myself with lower calories?
How active are you currently? How long have you been maintaining? How much lower is your intake than a TDEE estimate for your stats?
I think my activity level is moderate but I could be wrong, I work full time as a custodian and I walk 45 mins to 1 hour a day since I don't have a car. Other than that I don't workout. I've been maintaining for 2-3 months right now, based on my activity level and body weight I should be eating 2500 calories but instead i'm maintaining eating 2100 calories at the most. It's why I thought maybe I can eat less because my diet consists of processed foods that doesn't take a lot of effort to digest.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 913 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions