Phytates in plants?

Here's a posting from harvard.edu. Basically, the takeaway is if you eat a varied diet, not to worry. There are a lot of factors that play into the anti-nutrient impact, so it's not necessarily a certainty there will be a negative effect. You can also soak and or sprout seeds and legumes prior to use. If you are eating a healthy plant-based diet (not just fries and starches) you will be way ahead of the game compared to 90% of the population. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/anti-nutrients/#:~:text=Oxalates in green leafy vegetables,interfere with normal nutrient absorption.

Mellouk89 wrote: »

ninerbuff wrote: »

One of the reasons I prefer white rice over brown rice.

A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

Don't you take into consideration fiber and the potential health benefits of phytic acid?

There is a two gram difference in fiber between 100 g cooked white rice vs brown rice. I can easily make that up with 40 g of blueberries.

Mellouk89 wrote: »

dmkoenig wrote: »

Here's a posting from harvard.edu. Basically, the takeaway is if you eat a varied diet, not to worry. There are a lot of factors that play into the anti-nutrient impact, so it's not necessarily a certainty there will be a negative effect. You can also soak and or sprout seeds and legumes prior to use. If you are eating a healthy plant-based diet (not just fries and starches) you will be way ahead of the game compared to 90% of the population. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/anti-nutrients/#:~:text=Oxalates in green leafy vegetables,interfere with normal nutrient absorption.

From what I saw phytates are antioxidants and have many benefits, i'm skeptical about limiting grains and other foods high in phytates.

But for the vegans it may be a concern, and it seems they aren't told that a diet high in foods containing anti-nutrients could be detrimental.

And then we have “health experts“ who recommend soaking grains everytime you eat them, or to downright avoid foods high in phytic acid.

Look at large scale studies of vegan health outcomes. There's absolutely no evidence that eating plants is harming us, so I'm not sure what you'd like us to be told.

All the talk about "anti-nutrients" is purely speculative. From what we see from real world results of vegans and non-vegans who frequently eat plants, there's no evidence that we're being harmed by this.

psuLemon wrote: »

janejellyroll wrote: »

Mellouk89 wrote: »

dmkoenig wrote: »

Here's a posting from harvard.edu. Basically, the takeaway is if you eat a varied diet, not to worry. There are a lot of factors that play into the anti-nutrient impact, so it's not necessarily a certainty there will be a negative effect. You can also soak and or sprout seeds and legumes prior to use. If you are eating a healthy plant-based diet (not just fries and starches) you will be way ahead of the game compared to 90% of the population. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/anti-nutrients/#:~:text=Oxalates in green leafy vegetables,interfere with normal nutrient absorption.

From what I saw phytates are antioxidants and have many benefits, i'm skeptical about limiting grains and other foods high in phytates.

But for the vegans it may be a concern, and it seems they aren't told that a diet high in foods containing anti-nutrients could be detrimental.

And then we have “health experts“ who recommend soaking grains everytime you eat them, or to downright avoid foods high in phytic acid.

Look at large scale studies of vegan health outcomes. There's absolutely no evidence that eating plants is harming us, so I'm not sure what you'd like us to be told.

All the talk about "anti-nutrients" is purely speculative. From what we see from real world results of vegans and non-vegans who frequently eat plants, there's no evidence that we're being harmed by this.

Every single meta analysis on plants has shown positive impacts to metabolic health and all cause mortality. It's only the carnivore crowd that is pushing that speculation... similar to the early ketogenic crown suggesting that carbs where bad.

From what I've observed online nutrition advice has a real tendency to fall into speculation. There's a lot of "if this is true, then that is true, and that's why you should never eat [x]."

So it isn't that phylates aren't real, it's just that at some point you have to pair speculation with observing real life results and how these things behave in the context of actual human diets and health outcomes. You can't just begin with a single fact and spin it into a whole set of dietary recommendations.

(Carnivores frequently do this sort of thing, but really it's everywhere, including among people who use the same process to tell people that animal protein will kill them dead or that if you eat a Subway sandwich your intestines are now made of yoga mats).

ninerbuff wrote: »

One of the reasons I prefer white rice over brown rice.

A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

I’m also a white rice fan. I eat rice frequently. Brown rice is higher in arsenic than white rice. Also, Bruce Lee was a fan of white rice. That’s my excuse! 😋

As an herbivore, legumes and the cabbage family are prominent in my diet. I have bloodwork about every 6 months and my only vitamin deficiencies are Vitamin D and calcium- both very common for women my age (nearly 60)-- and for which I take supplements.