Negative calories....something to consider
illwillie
Posts: 19
A portion of brussel sprouts is worth 50 calories; yet 75 calories are used in digestion and absorption, so burning 25 calories of body fat. Other negative calories foods include broccoli, carrots, celery, leeks, apples, kiwis, satsumas and strawberries.
Please reply on other negative calories items.
Please reply on other negative calories items.
0
Replies
-
Negative calories are a myth.0
-
Where's that guy with the popcorn?0
-
I really don't think there are such things... here's an explanation:
http://caloriecount.about.com/negative-calories-myth-explained-b3497030 -
That whole digestion thing is already covered by your BMR. No need to calculate calories burned by chewing, digesting, or pooping.0
-
all foods will take calories to digest and absorb - true story! but, i'm thinkingyou could do some google research because there is so much controversy on whether or not it actually burns MORE and are better to eat for that reason.
That said ALL those foods you mentioned are healthy ones, nothing wrong with that!0 -
The problem is, illwillie is clearly in very good shape, and so he could easily convince someone who is not informed or educated about diet or nutrition that these foods actually exist0
-
I don't think any food can lower your BMR????0
-
There simply is no such thing as a negative calorie food.
www.time.com/time/.../0,28804,1896439_1896359_1896346,00.html0 -
Anybody else have no idea what a satsuma is?0
-
Anybody else have no idea what a satsuma is?
An orange....that has calories like all food.0 -
Anybody else have no idea what a satsuma is?
An orange....that has calories like all food.
It's more like a clementine.0 -
The main challenge in this argument is simply the term "Negative".
Some people may consider that "well, since Celery is Negative, I'll just eat a bunch of Celery and that will counteract the BAcon Double Cheezeburger I had at lunch".
In this context, the argument of being "Negative" is false since you're till injesting food. You can't counteract something you've already eaten by eating more.
In the context as part of your regular diet: Eating Fresh Fibrous veggies, that is where the Thermal Effect of Food (TEF) comes into play where your metabolism gets a boost requireing more energy (as opposed to the BAcon Double Cheeseburger) to digest and process.
In that sense, it's valid.
It's all about the choices you make for the quality of food you take in at your meals. A Veggie Omelette with Broccoli, Peppers, Celery and such, will be better for your overall health (and metabolism) than a Big Mac and Fries.
It's a small difference in the context of a single meal....but taken over a longer time scale like a few months...can add up to a significant amount of calories....and that's what the whole lifestyle change is all about.
Problem with this argument however as it's debated, is most often in the context.0 -
A portion of brussel sprouts is worth 50 calories; yet 75 calories are used in digestion and absorption, so burning 25 calories of body fat. Other negative calories foods include broccoli, carrots, celery, leeks, apples, kiwis, satsumas and strawberries.
Please reply on other negative calories items.
Nice try but I don't burn 75 calories walking a mile, much less digesting some brussels sprouts. Let's not be ridiculous.0 -
LMAO if ONLY I could eat TONS and TONS of strawberries and apples all day long and not count it! :laugh:
Seriously, one apple puts you to half your sugar intake. And it has 80 calories. you can NOT eat all you want and not count it. EVERYTHING counts.
The digestion calories are part of your BMR and included in the number that is your goal calories. You need to log everything to be accurate.0 -
The main challenge in this argument is simply the term "Negative".
Some people may consider that "well, since Celery is Negative, I'll just eat a bunch of Celery and that will counteract the BAcon Double Cheezeburger I had at lunch".
In this context, the argument of being "Negative" is false since you're till injesting food. You can't counteract something you've already eaten by eating more.
In the context as part of your regular diet: Eating Fresh Fibrous veggies, that is where the Thermal Effect of Food (TEF) comes into play where your metabolism gets a boost requireing more energy (as opposed to the BAcon Double Cheeseburger) to digest and process.
In that sense, it's valid.
It's all about the choices you make for the quality of food you take in at your meals. A Veggie Omelette with Broccoli, Peppers, Celery and such, will be better for your overall health (and metabolism) than a Big Mac and Fries.
It's a small difference in the context of a single meal....but taken over a longer time scale like a few months...can add up to a significant amount of calories....and that's what the whole lifestyle change is all about.
Problem with this argument however as it's debated, is most often in the context.
What a great explanation, thank you!0 -
Lol, no such thing as negative calories.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions