Weight loss myths

2

Replies

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,620 Member
    Please , no one post that mental health issues play no part in weight gain. That may be your experience but it is not mine. I went to therapy to resolve a binge eating disorder and since then am learning emotional regulation skills and have lost 77 pounds and still losing. Therapy has improved the quality of my life immensely.

    Of course mental health issues can play a part in weight gain, and (IMO) commonly do! Therapy can be extremely helpful, probably even among many people who don't feel as if they need it. I don't understand why there's more stigma around therapy, in our common culture, than there is around (say) consulting a registered dietitian for advice within their professional expertise.

    It's a myth, I think, that mental health issues are *universally* behind excess body weight, because there are other potential contributors/causes as well. (We've seen people post here sometimes claiming that excess weight is universally a mental health issue in some way. But I don't see you as saying that in your post - not at all.)
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,304 Member
    those article are ridiculous.

    At least the last one was arguing against calorie counting rather than CICO

    and whilst I accept that calorie counting, as a method, is not for everyone - their reasons were absurd

    and all 3 presented the false dichotomy that it is calorie counting vs nutritious eating - as if one somehow cannot do both or people calorie counting are just living on chips and cakes

    I'd argue one of the great things about calorie counting is that it works with all styles of eating. Want to focus on nutrient-rich foods? It will work. Want to have cake sometimes? It also works. It's flexible and that's one reason why I'm such a fan.



    Oh I agree.

    But the articles all posted as though calorie counting automatically equated eating ONLY nutrient poor foods like cake and chips
  • richardgavel
    richardgavel Posts: 1,001 Member
    Keto is the only way. Intermittent fasting is the only way. Drinking bulletproof coffee at 8:27am - and only 8:27am- while riding a Pygmy elephant in silk pajamas is the only way.

    Crap! I tried to cheat and save a little money. Went with the cheap cotton pajamas. Hopefully I can get a refund on the elephant.
  • springlering62
    springlering62 Posts: 8,681 Member
    edited April 2021
    Keto is the only way. Intermittent fasting is the only way. Drinking bulletproof coffee at 8:27am - and only 8:27am- while riding a Pygmy elephant in silk pajamas is the only way.

    Crap! I tried to cheat and save a little money. Went with the cheap cotton pajamas. Hopefully I can get a refund on the elephant.

    The refund policy is quite liberal. It’s the return shipping that’s gonna be a *kitten*.
  • ccrdragon
    ccrdragon Posts: 3,374 Member
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    Hey, hey, hey now... this is totally doable... I might have to sacrifice 1 or 2 body parts along the way but I CAN TOTALLY lose 56 pounds in the next 36 days!!!

    Before I start getting hate mail, I am totally joking here... :smile:
  • Theoldguy1
    Theoldguy1 Posts: 2,498 Member
    vpeaches wrote: »
    Sometimes nutrition labels will list a food as 0 calories per serving, but truthfully, food companies are allowed to round down to 0 calories if the food item is actually something like 0.4 calories. Multiple servings can in fact accumulate calories- though the amount is negligible, this could be an issue for people who are trying to do a fast.

    No it's not an issue.
  • aacha0908
    aacha0908 Posts: 12 Member
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    I agree about unrealistic expectations, but I also think that lack of commitment plays a huge part in why people quit.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    aacha0908 wrote: »
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    I agree about unrealistic expectations, but I also think that lack of commitment plays a huge part in why people quit.

    I think that's true, but I also think it's worth being careful about how we express that and to be strict about how we define it. One myth about overweight people, so maybe not weight loss itself, is that they aren't capable of committing to *anything*, or they aren't disciplined about *anything.* We often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings. I even catch myself thinking this way sometimes, as an obese person who really knows better!

    So sure, people quit trying to lose weight because they decide it's not something they want to prioritize. I've done that. But in many other areas of my life I've been a very committed and disciplined person. I'm still learning how to do it with this. Some of the skills and habits translate, but not all. And there's other stuff to work through that doesn't apply in other areas - probably part of why I've historically put this one off for so long!

    So well said.
  • aacha0908
    aacha0908 Posts: 12 Member
    aacha0908 wrote: »
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    I agree about unrealistic expectations, but I also think that lack of commitment plays a huge part in why people quit.

    I think that's true, but I also think it's worth being careful about how we express that and to be strict about how we define it. One myth about overweight people, so maybe not weight loss itself, is that they aren't capable of committing to *anything*, or they aren't disciplined about *anything.* We often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings. I even catch myself thinking this way sometimes, as an obese person who really knows better!

    So sure, people quit trying to lose weight because they decide it's not something they want to prioritize. I've done that. But in many other areas of my life I've been a very committed and disciplined person. I'm still learning how to do it with this. Some of the skills and habits translate, but not all. And there's other stuff to work through that doesn't apply in other areas - probably part of why I've historically put this one off for so long!

    @penguinmama87 Well said, however when I replied to a comment, I was talking about people who start the weight loss journey, and once they get to an obstacle (the pounds are not dropping fast enough, expectations are too high, exercising routine is harder than what they expected it to be, body aches after exercising, not having enough time to read labels or count the calories) quit. Not because their priorities shifts, like you said, but because they were discouraged by an obstacle. I did not say obese people quit because they can't commit to anything.
    I think you are right in saying that some people often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings, and it is essential to understand that it's not always the case.
  • aacha0908
    aacha0908 Posts: 12 Member
    aacha0908 wrote: »
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    I agree about unrealistic expectations, but I also think that lack of commitment plays a huge part in why people quit.

    I think that's true, but I also think it's worth being careful about how we express that and to be strict about how we define it. One myth about overweight people, so maybe not weight loss itself, is that they aren't capable of committing to *anything*, or they aren't disciplined about *anything.* We often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings. I even catch myself thinking this way sometimes, as an obese person who really knows better!

    So sure, people quit trying to lose weight because they decide it's not something they want to prioritize. I've done that. But in many other areas of my life I've been a very committed and disciplined person. I'm still learning how to do it with this. Some of the skills and habits translate, but not all. And there's other stuff to work through that doesn't apply in other areas - probably part of why I've historically put this one off for so long!

    Yep, this.

    The reason I got fat and stayed fat - obese even - was not that I could not commit to anything. It was that I spent a long time at the bottom of my own priority list. That mean I committed to just about everything BUT Myself and my own health/well being/fitness in many levels.

    Not that I couldn't commit to anything or work toward anything. I was just the least important thing in my life.

    That's a whole different sort of problem. But it isn't a lack of morals.

    @wunderkindking What you said seems like it was not a failed commitment to lose weight; it is just that your priorities were different.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    "Body Confusion"
  • Silentpadna
    Silentpadna Posts: 1,306 Member
    "You might be suffering from insulin resistance....which traps fat cells in your body. You need G_L_."

    Ugh.
  • penguinmama87
    penguinmama87 Posts: 1,155 Member
    aacha0908 wrote: »
    aacha0908 wrote: »
    I saw a headline as I was checking out at the grocery store : LOSE 56 POUNDS BY MEMORIAL DAY!!!!!!

    The magazine’s “date” was April 25th. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s 56 pounds in 36 days.

    And we wonder why people come here and quit when they don’t lose ten pounds their first week. People’s expectations are so skewed because of unscrupulous media, marketers , and social media.

    I agree about unrealistic expectations, but I also think that lack of commitment plays a huge part in why people quit.

    I think that's true, but I also think it's worth being careful about how we express that and to be strict about how we define it. One myth about overweight people, so maybe not weight loss itself, is that they aren't capable of committing to *anything*, or they aren't disciplined about *anything.* We often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings. I even catch myself thinking this way sometimes, as an obese person who really knows better!

    So sure, people quit trying to lose weight because they decide it's not something they want to prioritize. I've done that. But in many other areas of my life I've been a very committed and disciplined person. I'm still learning how to do it with this. Some of the skills and habits translate, but not all. And there's other stuff to work through that doesn't apply in other areas - probably part of why I've historically put this one off for so long!

    @penguinmama87 Well said, however when I replied to a comment, I was talking about people who start the weight loss journey, and once they get to an obstacle (the pounds are not dropping fast enough, expectations are too high, exercising routine is harder than what they expected it to be, body aches after exercising, not having enough time to read labels or count the calories) quit. Not because their priorities shifts, like you said, but because they were discouraged by an obstacle. I did not say obese people quit because they can't commit to anything.
    I think you are right in saying that some people often assume that excess weight is a sign of multiple serious moral failings, and it is essential to understand that it's not always the case.

    I think you're right, but the reason I said what I did was because "not being committed" is (in my experience, anyway) frequently a reason to dismiss a person's struggle, who might actually be more likely to succeed if provided with the right resources or support. Learned helplessness is a real phenomenon, but for a person who reaches an obstacle and doesn't know how to get around it, endlessly spinning their wheels isn't really more meritorious than saying, "Well, I'm going to do this other thing instead because I know something about how to do that." I think being open and realistic about what it's like to lose weight helps manage expectations appropriately. If you think dieting is always miserable and endless suffering, then yeah, I'd want to throw in the towel too (and I have, back when I thought that.) A lot of people can endure intense suffering for short spurts of time with a known end point. But if there's no end in sight, yeah, many of them will give up. Who would put themselves through that? It's a good thing it doesn't have to be like that with weight loss.
  • ShrinkingDucky
    ShrinkingDucky Posts: 12 Member
    The need to eat less bread.

    This came from my stepmother who saw no issue with the amount of porridge (oatmeal), pasta or cheese eaten, it was all the evil evil bread!
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,304 Member
    Since I got a lot of disagrees on my "You must use a food scale to weigh all your food" (unsurprisingly), I"ll piggyback off of that:

    The myth that there is a one-size-fits-all approach to weight loss, whether that be using an app like MFP, doing keto, IF, intuitive eating, etc. Nope. Obviously we're all here on MFP because it works for us, is working, or believe it will work. Doesn't mean that one HAS to use it to lose weight, or even track calories, macros, etc. People can and do lose weight using Intuitive Eating...honestly wish I could be one of them. Just because it did/didn't work for you (or you don't think it would), doesn't mean it can't work for someone else.


    Yes, that is true.

    Whilst many of the myths here are clearly myths - so is the food scale must and sometimes it's sister Log everything to the minutest detail

    Clearly counting calories and food weighing is integral to MFP method - but it isn't the only method or pathway to success, nor is using that method exactly the same way as others do.
  • springlering62
    springlering62 Posts: 8,681 Member
    😮
    From another thread:
    grqx9lvrkxwy.jpeg
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    edited April 2021
    Since I got a lot of disagrees on my "You must use a food scale to weigh all your food" (unsurprisingly), I"ll piggyback off of that:

    The myth that there is a one-size-fits-all approach to weight loss, whether that be using an app like MFP, doing keto, IF, intuitive eating, etc. Nope. Obviously we're all here on MFP because it works for us, is working, or believe it will work. Doesn't mean that one HAS to use it to lose weight, or even track calories, macros, etc. People can and do lose weight using Intuitive Eating...honestly wish I could be one of them. Just because it did/didn't work for you (or you don't think it would), doesn't mean it can't work for someone else.

    Totally agree with this, and didn't disagree, but looking back I suspect the disagrees weren't with saying a food scale is not required for all (which I think is broadly accepted by most at MFP), but the implication that the elimination diet made fat loss faster than a similar deficit. But I am not at all sure you meant that, I just think the prior post might have been interpreted to mean that.

    Or maybe people were disagreeing with the notion that "one has to use a scale" is a myth, as it's rare to find someone who believes that IME.

    You just never know why someone disagrees (and I do wish people would explain if it hasn't already been explained).