Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Mediterranean Diet Health Warning: More Harm Than Good?

Options
Dante_80
Dante_80 Posts: 479 Member
edited November 2021 in Debate Club
Posting an interesting study I found.

Mediterranean Diet Health Warning: More Harm Than Good – Unless Organic
https://greekcitytimes.com/2021/11/06/mediterranean-diet-health-warning-more-harm-than-good-unless-organic/

eaH8knX.jpg

New research offers alarming warnings, suggesting that pesticides and contaminants found on the produce and whole grains that are so prevalent in the Mediterranean diet may be doing your body more harm than good.

Instead of providing the health benefits that the Mediterranean diet is so famed for, the study instead shows that switching from an ordinary “Western” diet to a traditional Mediterranean diet may triple one’s intake of environmental contaminants, thereby resulting in a weakening of the human immune system, reduction of fertility, and even stunting the growth and development of children.

Several of the environmental contaminants discovered as a result of the study may even affect hormones in the body.

“Many of the synthetic pesticides detected in both food and urine samples in this study are confirmed or suspected endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC). The 10 times higher pesticide exposure from conventional foods may therefore provide a mechanistic explanation for the lower incidence of overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome and cancer associated with high levels of organic food consumption in epidemiological/cohort studies,” explains Professor Carlo Leifert, Study Project Manager.

Unless, of course, everything in the Mediterranean diet is farmed organically, in which case slashes the intake of these contaminants by 90 percent.

In the study, conducted by a team of scientists at the University of Oslo, participants ate “ordinary Western foods” for a week prior to the study commencement. The participants then provided urine samples before all heading off to a farm on the Greek Island of Crete for two weeks.

Once in Crete, the group was divided into two – one half eating food cultivated normally, whilst the other half consumed totally organic produce only.


“There is growing evidence from observational studies that the health benefits of increasing fruit, vegetables and whole grain consumption are partially diminished by the higher pesticide exposure associated with these foods. Our study demonstrates that consumption of organic foods allows consumers to change to a healthier diet, without an increased intake of pesticides,” the study team from the University of Oslo concludes.

However given the small size of the 27-participant-strong study, researchers say it is still too early for health officials to start advising against the Mediterranean diet, believing that more research is necessary to confirm the findings.

Regardless, Mediterranean diet lovers may be wise to take note. If you’re not going organic, you may be doing your body more harm than good.

“This study provides clear evidence that both our diet and the way we produce food may affect the level of exposure to synthetic chemical and ultimately our health,” says Newcastle University’s Professor Chris Seal.

Replies

  • Dante_80
    Dante_80 Posts: 479 Member
    edited November 2021
    Options
    The study from the article.

    Diet and food type affect urinary pesticide residue excretion profiles in healthy individuals: results of a randomized controlled dietary intervention trial


    While the size is small, the interesting part is that the trial was very strictly monitored and didn't rely on self-reporting but on a set nutrition while living in a camp.

    Background
    Observational studies have linked pesticide exposure to various diseases, whereas organic food consumption has been associated with positive health outcomes. Organic farming standards prohibit the use of most pesticides, and organic food consumption may therefore reduce pesticide exposure.

    Objectives
    To determine the effects of diet (Western compared with Mediterranean) and food type (conventional compared with organic) and sex on urinary pesticide residue excretion (UPRE), as well as associations between specific diet components and UPRE.

    Methods
    In this 2-wk, randomized dietary intervention trial, healthy adults were randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 13) or conventional (n = 14) group. Whereas participants in the intervention group consumed a Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) made entirely from organic foods, the conventional group consumed a MedDiet made entirely from conventional foods. Both groups consumed habitual Western diets made from conventional foods before and after the 2-wk intervention period. The primary outcome was UPRE. In addition, we assessed diet composition and pesticide residue profiles in foods eaten. Participants were aware of group assignment, but the study assessors were not.

    Results
    During the intervention period, total UPRE was 91% lower with organic (mean 17 μg/d; 95% CI: 15, 19) than with conventional (mean 180 μg/d; 95% CI: 153, 208) food consumption (P < 0.0001). In the conventional group, switching from the habitual Western diet to the MedDiet increased insecticide excretion from 7 to 25 μg/d (P < 0.0001), organophosphate excretion from 5 to 19 μg/d (P < 0.0001), and pyrethroid residue excretion from 2.0 to 4.5 μg/d (P < 0.0001). Small but significant effects of sex were detected for chlormequat, herbicide, and total pesticide residue excretion.

    Conclusions
    Changing from a habitual Western diet to a MedDiet was associated with increased insecticide, organophosphate, and pyrethroid exposure, whereas organic food consumption reduced exposure to all groups of synthetic chemical pesticides. This may explain the positive health outcomes linked to organic food consumption in observational studies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03254537.
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,017 Member
    edited November 2021
    Options
    A diet of strictly organic origin will best most if not all conventional diets and look, it's even better than the conventional Mediterranean diet. What both diets were exactly composed of would have been good considering the food was administered in a camp setting just for comparison purposes. Basically it would have been interesting to see what these professors think a "conventional" western diet consisted of, which was apparently lower in pesticides than the standard Med diet. Also the participants were privy to which diet they were consuming and I suspect it was because the obvious was just too obvious and if your comparing to observational studies, like this one appears to be doing then the outcome is biased and somehow I get the feeling this isn't peer reviewed. Nice to get paid for research with an outcome that was pretty much a given. A great example of liver function too. Cheers
  • Theoldguy1
    Theoldguy1 Posts: 2,477 Member
    Options
    So much BS.
  • Speakeasy76
    Speakeasy76 Posts: 961 Member
    Options
    Well, according to the link for another article at the bottom of this one, apparently the Mediterranean diet improves erectile dysfunction. So, maybe your risk for cancer increases but you can still get it up :D .

    Seriously though, what other thing that is supposed to be "good" for us are "scientists" going to find is actually "bad" for us? Isn't that how it always works? I think we already know that eating stuff full of pesticide residue isn't great for us, but is eating all manmade ultra-processed foods really better?
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,017 Member
    Options
    Well, according to the link for another article at the bottom of this one, apparently the Mediterranean diet improves erectile dysfunction. So, maybe your risk for cancer increases but you can still get it up :D .

    Seriously though, what other thing that is supposed to be "good" for us are "scientists" going to find is actually "bad" for us? Isn't that how it always works? I think we already know that eating stuff full of pesticide residue isn't great for us, but is eating all manmade ultra-processed foods really better?

    Also the EU have very strict laws on the amount of pesticides allowed into the food supply. Not sure what they are but a 90% increase is still within these guidelines, so the low threshold is adequate enough to allow the alternative foods to be served. Yes organic is better, we knew that.
  • Dante_80
    Dante_80 Posts: 479 Member
    edited November 2021
    Options
    I think the assumption is that the much higher percentage of fruits, grains and vegetables in the Med diet can lead to an overall higher (relatively speaking of course) insecticide, organophosphate, and pyrethroid exposure? It wouldn't be that weird, if they are simply focusing on those specific markers in the urine.

    Of course, to gauge that properly we would need to know what the "habitual Western diet" that was used as a control consists of.
  • 33gail33
    33gail33 Posts: 1,155 Member
    edited November 2021
    Options
    I would have thought that what one considers a "typical western diet" would be fairly heavy on grains - just more processed grains. And soy is in so much processed food and animal feed - I always thought soy was heavy on the pesticides.
    I wonder what diet they were actually using for comparison.
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    Options
    33gail33 wrote: »
    I would have thought that what one considers a "typical western diet" would be fairly heavy on grains - just more processed grains. And soy is in so much processed food and animal feed - I always thought soy was heavy on the pesticides.
    I wonder what diet they were actually using for comparison.

    "The study was carried out with 27 post-graduate students during an agricultural field course in Crete, Greece and lasted five weeks. The 14 in the conventional group consumed a Mediterranean diet made entirely from conventional foods, while the intervention group consumed the same diet made entirely from certified organic foods. Before and after the intervention period all participants consumed their self-selected habitual Western diets, which according to their food diaries were low in fruit, vegetables and wine consumption and consisted entirely of conventional foods."

    I don't know what a normal self-selected Western diet for post grads at U of Oslo, other than I guess low in fruit, veg, and wine.
  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 6,333 Member
    Options
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    33gail33 wrote: »
    I would have thought that what one considers a "typical western diet" would be fairly heavy on grains - just more processed grains. And soy is in so much processed food and animal feed - I always thought soy was heavy on the pesticides.
    I wonder what diet they were actually using for comparison.

    "The study was carried out with 27 post-graduate students during an agricultural field course in Crete, Greece and lasted five weeks. The 14 in the conventional group consumed a Mediterranean diet made entirely from conventional foods, while the intervention group consumed the same diet made entirely from certified organic foods. Before and after the intervention period all participants consumed their self-selected habitual Western diets, which according to their food diaries were low in fruit, vegetables and wine consumption and consisted entirely of conventional foods."

    I don't know what a normal self-selected Western diet for post grads at U of Oslo, other than I guess low in fruit, veg, and wine.

    It's more complicated. The post grads weren't from the university of Oslo, only the researchers. The post grads were from a UK university (but I can't remember which one and I don't seem to be able to access the article anymore).