MyFitnessPlus adds calories burned from cardio to my goal; so why do cardio?
junkmail4379
Posts: 16 Member
Please don't read my question as snide. It's an honest question.
MyFitnessPal begins the day by setting my daily calorie goal at 1,500. That's about 500 less than my average daily calorie requirements (which means I'm losing weight, which is good).
But if I add an exercise and burn (let's say) 300 calories, it adds that to my daily goal, from 1,500 to 1,800. So either way, I'm losing weight at the same rate (500 less than my daily requirements).
So my question is: is there any point to doing cardio at all?
Maybe there is. I'm finding that as I up my daily calorie goal, I have to eat more, which makes me feel less hungry throughout the day. I also imagine that cardio has many other health benefits than just losing weight. Am I right?
Furthermore, I also have a muscle building goal. My trainer tells me that if I want to lose weight (fat) while also build muscle, I have to remain in a sort of "goldilocks zone". If the gap between calories consumed and calories burned is too small, I won't lose fat weight (at least not at a reasonable rate). If it's too large, I won't build muscle (my body will just burn muscle as well as fat). So this consistent gap of 500 calories might also be built in to help keep me in this goldilocks zone for building muscle. Am I right about that?
MyFitnessPal begins the day by setting my daily calorie goal at 1,500. That's about 500 less than my average daily calorie requirements (which means I'm losing weight, which is good).
But if I add an exercise and burn (let's say) 300 calories, it adds that to my daily goal, from 1,500 to 1,800. So either way, I'm losing weight at the same rate (500 less than my daily requirements).
So my question is: is there any point to doing cardio at all?
Maybe there is. I'm finding that as I up my daily calorie goal, I have to eat more, which makes me feel less hungry throughout the day. I also imagine that cardio has many other health benefits than just losing weight. Am I right?
Furthermore, I also have a muscle building goal. My trainer tells me that if I want to lose weight (fat) while also build muscle, I have to remain in a sort of "goldilocks zone". If the gap between calories consumed and calories burned is too small, I won't lose fat weight (at least not at a reasonable rate). If it's too large, I won't build muscle (my body will just burn muscle as well as fat). So this consistent gap of 500 calories might also be built in to help keep me in this goldilocks zone for building muscle. Am I right about that?
1
Replies
-
Yes, that's the point!
Most calorie calculators include exercise. Thus if you say you want to lose 1/2lbs per week and you say you exercise you'll get 1800 calories to eat per day. The result is still the same. Only in MFP you get your weightloss goal without exercise and you log it separately, hence still getting 1800 calories.
I assume you're male? If you then 1500 is already the bare minimum you should be eating. If you eat 1500 and exercise for 300, then that's the same as only eating 1200 calories. That's not good nor healthy. That can lead to giving up and binging. To muscle loss instead of fat loss. Thus eat enough.0 -
junkmail4379 wrote: »Please don't read my question as snide. It's an honest question.
MyFitnessPal begins the day by setting my daily calorie goal at 1,500. That's about 500 less than my average daily calorie requirements (which means I'm losing weight, which is good).
But if I add an exercise and burn (let's say) 300 calories, it adds that to my daily goal, from 1,500 to 1,800. So either way, I'm losing weight at the same rate (500 less than my daily requirements).
So my question is: is there any point to doing cardio at all?
Maybe there is. I'm finding that as I up my daily calorie goal, I have to eat more, which makes me feel less hungry throughout the day. I also imagine that cardio has many other health benefits than just losing weight. Am I right?
Think about it: Why do they call it cardiovascular exercise? Because it's good for your heart, blood vessels, blood pressure, etc.
It has other physiological benefits, too: Cortisol (stress hormone) reduction, cellular health stuff like telomere length, etc.
It has positive consequences in daily life: More endurance, higher energy level. (That last, as long as you don't overdo for your current fitness level. A manageable challenge to current fitness will improve fitness. As you get fitter, increase duration, frequency, intensity, or change exercise type to keep that mild challenge.)
Eating more calories not only can potentially reduce hunger, it also allows you to get more nutrition: More protein, more healthy fats, more servings of varied, colorful veggies and fruits. That nutrition is good for your health, too.
Here's a radical thought: Cardio doesn't cause weight loss. Whaaatt??!!
No, what causes weight loss is eating fewer calories than you burn (from everything you do, including just being alive, daily life stuff, exercise of all types). Cardio burns calories, sure.
Personally, I became a short-endurance athlete while still obese, trained hard 6 days most weeks, even competed (not always unsuccessfully, in age group competition). But I stayed obese for another dozen years that way, until I got my eating in line with my calorie burn. Yeah, the exercise made me fitter, healthier (not fully healthy), and improved my quality of life. But I stayed fat, because it was easy to eat those few hundred extra calories on average daily, especially when not calorie counting.Furthermore, I also have a muscle building goal. My trainer tells me that if I want to lose weight (fat) while also build muscle, I have to remain in a sort of "goldilocks zone". If the gap between calories consumed and calories burned is too small, I won't lose fat weight (at least not at a reasonable rate). If it's too large, I won't build muscle (my body will just burn muscle as well as fat). So this consistent gap of 500 calories might also be built in to help keep me in this goldilocks zone for building muscle. Am I right about that?
Yes, that's right - approximately. But it's a continuum. The faster you lose weight, the less likely you are to add muscle mass.
Think about it: You're trying to gain weight (muscle) at the same time you're trying to lose weight (fat). That's a balancing act.
The maximum muscle-mass gain potential (in calorie terms) is with a calorie surplus (i.e., gaining scale weight over time). Anything less than that - weight maintenance or loss - limits muscle-mass gain potential. Somewhere at the faster loss end of that continuum is where loss of muscle mass starts to be a bigger risk. Good nutrition (especially but not exclusively adequate protein) and a good strength training program will limit the potential muscle mass loss to the extent feasible, and encourage muscle mass gain to the extent possible at reduced calories.
Results will vary individually, but you'll see them with patience and time. Expect to gain strength fairly fast at first when starting out, maybe even see some more muscle definition. The early stages of that aren't mostly muscle mass gain, but rather better recruiting and using existing muscle fibers (neuromuscular adaptation), and some "pump" from water retention for muscle repair, plus maybe thinning of the overlying subcutaneous fat layer letting muscles show more. It's all good stuff. Actually adding muscle fibers comes later and slower.
You're on a good track, sounds like your trainer's giving you good advice.
P.S. I do cardio because it's freakin' fun. My favorite types - rowing skinny rowing shells on water, riding my bike on the local trail system - are so fun I'd do them even if it weren't good for me (but they are). I do some other cardio (in our icy, snowy Winter) to stay in shape for the fun stuff. If your cardio isn't fun, or at least tolerably pleasant and practical, find different cardio. There are dozens or hundreds of options and only some of them are in a gym.3 -
It depends on what lifestyle category you've selected. You have to play around with it for a couple of months and see how your equations are working.
There is a theory called G Flux. The basis is its better to eat more to nourish the body and exercise more to utilize the nutrients better.
1 -
Thanks for the feedback everyone!
The take away I'm getting from this is, no, cardio isn't technically necessary to achieve my goals, but there are certainly many health benefits to be gained from it anyway.1 -
Right. It's basically, do you want to hit a calorie goal while also improving your cardio health and fitness, or hit the same calorie goal without that?
Your trainer was right about a deficit being too large will start to impact your muscle retention and building more than a smaller deficit. It's relevant to consider how much weight you have to lose. Think of the deficit as a %. You can probably build muscle at 10% below maintenance if you have quite a lot of fat, so if your maintenance is 2000, that would be 200. At 20%, maybe not. But that's OK, if you have a lot of fat and your priority is fat loss first. Make sure you get plenty of protein during this, close to 1g per pound of your ideal weight.0 -
You want to exercise to get fitter and leaner and healthier. The app is only telling you how much calories you are burning when you exercise. If you want to lose weight quicker then DON'T eat these calories.0
-
Cardio increases your calorie burn, and therefore, you can either have more to eat, or a larger deficit, or find a happy middle ground in there.
Building muscle helps up your metabolism. If you're shooting for a recomposition (slowly building muscle bulk while still losing some fat), you're not going to see much scale movement, and may be very disappointed by the results as it is a very, very, very slow process. Most people will either focus on losing fat or building muscle. You can reduce muscle loss by keeping to a more reasonable deficit and lifting. If you're new to lifting, you'll see strength changes, and may even build a little tiny bit of bulk while visibly losing fat.
Cardio has many benefits. I don't love it, but making it more of a priority (fitness and health in general this year has me (at 44 going on 45) almost back to my BP in my early 20's when I was super fit and in the military. Not quite there yet, but it's close, and slowly getting better and better. This after a BP scare about 18 months ago when I found out it was off the charts high - all of this without any medication I might add (I do take some supplements including a high quality Omega-3).
I've also noticed with making this more of a priority this year, my energy levels in general are a million times better. I recover FAR quicker from extra-strenous activities, and my regular routine my recoveries are quick, even on days when I really push it. Even back to my sport for the first time in almost a year, and needed no special recovery (historically that would have wiped me out for a couple days). TONS of advantages to doing cardio - and strength training. There is a lot of new research coming out on the roles our muscles play in our physiology, and how using them has a much bigger impact on many other body systems than we previously knew/realized.
IF all you're worried about is losing fat and the number on the scale, and don't want or care about long term health and wellness or overall health and wellness, then don't sweat the workouts. They are just some extra calorie burn if you don't eat the extra back.0 -
junkmail4379 wrote: »Thanks for the feedback everyone!
The take away I'm getting from this is, no, cardio isn't technically necessary to achieve my goals, but there are certainly many health benefits to be gained from it anyway.
Exactly. And the way MFP is set up, giving you a calorie goal and adding the exercise calories on top as kind of a reward for doing something good for your health can strengthen this habit. With most calorie calculators an estimate for workout calories is already included in your deficit. Thus you might be getting 1500+300 here, but elsewhere you'd get 1800 to start with.0 -
I went from being out of breath showering to running 5km a day in the span of 8 months. I'm turning 41 in a month
Random benefits I've noticed
-my generalized anxiety disorder is more or less gone. I don't take any meds and haven't felt anxious other than when my dog was sick (my poor baby lol. She's fine now)
- I don't sweat nearly as much
- Our sex life has well.....yeah it's good lol
- I feel like I'm in my 20s again. So much energy
- it gives me something to look forward to
- my blood work is amazing. My BP went from 148/101 to 108/64
- I play baseball and my God has my play improved.
So many other things that I owe to cardio1 -
Cardio is exercising your cardiovascular system which keeps your heart healthy. Not to mention it increases your overall cardiovascular fitness so physically demanding recreational activities. Cardio can also be a lot of things, not just droning away on stationary equipment at the gym. You'll rarely find me doing that. Most of my cardio is cycling, mountain biking, hiking, and walking my dog with a bit of kayaking and swimming thrown in...and occasionally kicking around the soccer ball with my kids.0
-
There is a setting somewhere to choose whether to add your burned calories to your total, or not. It might be under the goals section.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions