HIIT Vs Cardio for quick fat burn

Hi.. I am Vaishnavi.. I am a new user โœŒ๏ธ๐Ÿ™‚...
I wanna lose weight as fast as I can.. I suffer from inconsistency issues.. I have an event very soon.. I wanna look good and feel good.. Quick results can motivate me I guess ๐Ÿฅน

HIIT Vs Cardio for quick fat burn 3 votes

HIIT
66%
hannahlurding1943L8dyAdeline 2 votes
Cardio
33%
japanlandberg 1 vote

Replies

  • robertw486
    robertw486 Posts: 2,449 Member
    HIIT IS cardio. It's just a form of cardio. Weight loss comes primarily from a calorie deficit, not exercise.
    You can't outrun/outwalk a bad diet.
    If you suffer from inconsistency issues........be more consistent. There is no other solution.
    Super-quick weight loss is not a good idea in any case, it can wreak havoc physically. Gallstones, for one.

    Though I completely agree with the majority of your points, HIIT being "a form of cardio" is really the twisting of the original HIIT type workouts to include more things and call them HIIT. By nature, most of the earlier workouts required efforts that reached the anaerobic level of effort, thus creating an oxygen deficit and improving oxygen uptake.

    Over the years the term has been watered down to include many types of exercise. But the original Tabata IE1 protocol required "work" periods of no less than 170% of VO2Max. And as surprising as it is, most humans can push beyond that for very short intervals.


    I personally think the entire use of the HIIT acronym these days is just becoming a way to say "exercising fairly hard" and many of those exercises won't ever resemble the earlier days of the way those protocols were designed.


    But I agree... without proper diet and deficit you could do HIIT every day and gain weight. Likewise you could sit on the couch every day and lose weight if you control your eating. And for most of us, there is rarely if ever a time to justify really rapid weight loss.
  • prduk2000
    prduk2000 Posts: 49 Member
    I recently read an article about the TV program "The Biggest Loser." I have not watched the program, but the paper said they got them through gruelling training and calorie reduction. The funny thing is that they cannot organise reunions after programs have ended, as everyone regained their original weight.
    I agree with everyone's advice before mine.
    I have started this journey and have not yet seen the results, but I am building up something I could later maintain.
    If you want to lose fat, eat better and healthier. Exercise and build muscle (the muscles mostly feed on products produced by burning fat).

    By the way, the body and the mind can be funny and going through significant calorie reduction and intense workouts has got many people into developing eating disorders.

    Best wishes!
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,092 Member
    HIIT IS cardio. It's just a form of cardio. Weight loss comes primarily from a calorie deficit, not exercise.
    You can't outrun/outwalk a bad diet.
    If you suffer from inconsistency issues........be more consistent. There is no other solution.
    Super-quick weight loss is not a good idea in any case, it can wreak havoc physically. Gallstones, for one.

    Though I completely agree with the majority of your points, HIIT being "a form of cardio" is really the twisting of the original HIIT type workouts to include more things and call them HIIT. By nature, most of the earlier workouts required efforts that reached the anaerobic level of effort, thus creating an oxygen deficit and improving oxygen uptake.

    Over the years the term has been watered down to include many types of exercise. But the original Tabata IE1 protocol required "work" periods of no less than 170% of VO2Max. And as surprising as it is, most humans can push beyond that for very short intervals.

    I personally think the entire use of the HIIT acronym these days is just becoming a way to say "exercising fairly hard" and many of those exercises won't ever resemble the earlier days of the way those protocols were designed.

    While I wouldn't say "watered down" necessarily, I agree that the HIIT label is now applied to many exercise type that don't fit the original definition. I've even seen the cardiovascular benefits of original-definition HIIT claimed as benefits from some of these extended-definition exercise types, but I don't think the research supports that claim.

    Nonetheless, some of the current-definition HIIT workouts can be useful exercise, for the right goals and current fitness level.

    I admit to serious concern about some of the fast-paced, high-rep, low-resistance forms done with weights/resistance - dumbbells or whatever - in a group setting, sometimes with energetic music. The combination of fast pace and high reps makes fatigue more likely, and in-session fatigue tends to make form suffer. Poor form increases injury risk, and the minimal supervision - sometimes minimal instructor expertise - in these group settings can increase that risk.

    Some of that risk exists even with fast-paced individual exercise, like the calisthenics-y HIIT, so-called functional fitness formats of HIIT, etc. Fast pace + high intensity + complex movement patterns = increased injury risk.

    In my mind, that makes those kinds of exercise an especially poor choice for relative fitness beginners, who are less likely to know proper form in the first place among other issues. Unfortunately, relative beginners may also be more likely to be hooked by the gee-whiz marketing that sometimes accompanies these programs.

    As an aside, I'd say something similar about original-definition HIIT. Yes, humans can reach 170% of VO2max, and anyone can exert what they consider maximal cardiovascular effort . . . but people who don't have a reasonable cardiovascular fitness base really shouldn't be doing either one, IMO, at least not without medical clearance.

    Definitionally - and this is another thing that makes me scratch my head a bit about the OP - HIIT isn't an exercise type. It's a pacing strategy. Any exercise I know of can be done at high intensity, or done in an interval format. We get questions here periodically about how to determine calorie burn for HIIT. It's an unanswerable question, because calorie estimating depends materially on the exercise type, and HIIT can be nearly anything.

    HIIT by any definition is over-hyped these days IMO. If it were as magical as the marketing suggests, elite athletes would be doing it every day or many times a week, as some enthusiastic amateurs are. But the elites - who have the best professional advice money can buy about improving fitness - don't do that. High intensity work tends to be a small fraction of elites' total training load, at least in my strength-y cardiovascular sport. If elites don't train that way, I don't see why us regular duffers would get the claimed huge benefits from it.

    Yes, this is a rant. I'm very irritated by HIIT marketing; it's kind of a pet peeve. It's just another one of those things that tries to exploit the public's lack of knowledge of exercise science to pull in revenue . . . not that I'm any big expert. :D It doesn't take a lot of expertise to question the marketing claims, though.

    But I agree... without proper diet and deficit you could do HIIT every day and gain weight. Likewise you could sit on the couch every day and lose weight if you control your eating. And for most of us, there is rarely if ever a time to justify really rapid weight loss.

  • Jhardyman1
    Jhardyman1 Posts: 7 Member
    I have been doing a mix of the hiit program on the exercise bike and steady state cycling plus strength training workouts- focusing on upper body, abs, lower body on different days. I've lost about 12 pounds so far with calorie deficit and focusing on protein. I'm sure some of it is water weight, but there is a clear difference in progress photos and its only been 2 1/2 weeks....I have had some low blood pressure a couple times. I'm not sure if this is recommended but I started drinking a little salt water a couple times a day. Seems to be helping.
  • Thank you guys.. Your suggestions helped me a lot ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ’œ