What Do People Think of Food Dye?

It seems like people have some strong opinions about food dyes. I saw this today and wondered what the my fitness pal community thinks and how it effects their shopping habits?


https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8234pG3/

Replies

  • yirara
    yirara Posts: 10,333 Member

    I don't understand this question. Does food get sold in some countries coloured in unusual colour?

  • sollyn23l2
    sollyn23l2 Posts: 1,934 Member

    Most packaged foods have artificial colors added to them.

  • yirara
    yirara Posts: 10,333 Member

    Ah ok, that's what you mean. I hardly eat processed food. But I know that bread is coloured darker to appear like a comic version of wholegrain.

  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,535 Member

    The US has around 3000 allowable food additives compared to Europe who have around 300 so if we drop some food dye from our list I'm sure most of the population won't miss it, I could be wrong though.

  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,146 Member

    The problem with a proven safe approach is that somebody would have to prove veggies, fruits, grains, dairy, eggs, meat, legumes, seafood, poultry, certain mushrooms, yeast, salt, honey, etc. are safe before they could be sold for human consumption. Right now, they're just generally assumed to be safe.

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,844 Member

    And that's why I used what some will call weasel words, when I wrote "I'd like to see the FDA adopt more of a "proven safe" posture for approving food ingredients, rather than the "OK until proven unsafe" kind of thing".

    I admit I haven't studied the question closely, but IMU Europe has moved closer to the approach of wanting to approve additives as safe. The US's permissive approach has been shown to have some downsides, though I'm confident a stricter model has downsides as well. Regulation is a balancing act.

    I'm not a chemist, not a dietitian, none of that. As a consumer, I'd prefer a bit shorter leash on producers. If such a thing were to happen, there normally would be a long process of people who actually are more expert working out the details. It's possible that current circumstances would make that kind of regulatory change process less consultative, collaborative, or dialectical . . . which would not be a good thing, IMO again.

  • MsCzar
    MsCzar Posts: 1,081 Member

    Not too stressed about it. I'm not pounding Code Red Mountain Dew, Cheetos, M&Ms and Twizzlers all day long. I don't eat many processed foods, but if I have eat the odd thing with food dyes, I figure I'll probably survive. 😁

  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,413 Member
    edited March 31

    Interesting demand o n the video - "stop feeding us dangerous chemicals!"

    regardless of whether they are dangerous or not, nobody else is feeding them to you.

    Adults can read food lables and decide not to buy something with whatever ingredient they are avoiding

    Myself I don't bother checking for artificial colours - whatever foods I am eating with them in it are not giving me migraines, irritability, whatever else was claimed

    Carcinogenic? - if so, way down list of possible causes. I abide by the big guns of sun protection, not smoking, alcohol in moderation - and ignore every other little thing claimed to be carcinogenic, usually with no qualification on context or dosage.

    In short, OP, I don't have strong opinions about food dyes and it does not affect my shopping habits.

  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,535 Member
    edited March 31

    Yeah, it basically comes down to the difference in regulatory philosophy. One uses a "reactive approach" the USA, and says prove it's unhealthy with conclusive proof because emerging evidence is not enough while the other (Countries) use "precautionary principles" requiring additives to be proven safe before they are approved for use.

    Almost all research in the USA is industry funded and the GRAS process allows companies to self-certify an additive's safety without formal FDA approval, as long as they believe it meets the GRAS standards. I think we can see where that might be conflicting.

    I think a lot is cultural as well. Most European Countries have traditions that draw on centuries of norms that promote a more natural approach to food.

  • claireychn074
    claireychn074 Posts: 1,788 Member

    I’m neutral about food dyes (live in the UK so they are possibly not as prevalent), but the ones I think a lot of people don’t know about are the colourings in animal feed to make egg yolks bright and yellow and farmed salmon pink. It’s not that easy to avoid those - even free range eggs can have colouring in the feed.


    When I used to keep chickens I got the most fluorescent yolks when they ate the Rhubarb plant. And too much beetroot turned the whites pink.