Calories Burned is not matching
vintageprop
Posts: 62 Member
Hello I was wondering if someone could shed some light on this as I'm entirely confused.
I used a stationary bike for 40 mins and the machine said I burned 75 calories. I input my weight at the beginning which is 117.
Online when I input 40 mins of vigorous stationary biking with my weight, it says I burned about 400 calories. That just doesn't feel right.
How do I know which one is more correct? Should I just buy a heart monitor calorie counter watch or something?
I used a stationary bike for 40 mins and the machine said I burned 75 calories. I input my weight at the beginning which is 117.
Online when I input 40 mins of vigorous stationary biking with my weight, it says I burned about 400 calories. That just doesn't feel right.
How do I know which one is more correct? Should I just buy a heart monitor calorie counter watch or something?
0
Replies
-
Hello I was wondering if someone could shed some light on this as I'm entirely confused.
I used a stationary bike for 40 mins and the machine said I burned 75 calories. I input my weight at the beginning which is 117.
Online when I input 40 mins of vigorous stationary biking with my weight, it says I burned about 400 calories. That just doesn't feel right.
How do I know which one is more correct? Should I just buy a heart monitor calorie counter watch or something?0 -
if you just sat and stared hard at the bike for 40 minutes you could burn 75 calories
400 is more likely if you broke a sweat0 -
More likely, it's somewhere in the middle. The only real way to know is to get a HRM that tracks your calories burned.0
-
A heart rate monitor is a good investment. I use a Polar F6 when I'm on my elliptical the difference is always higher on the machine, so I wish it were the right one. :happy:
I burn an average of 100 calories per 10 minutes of sweaty, vigorous exercise. Sounds the 400 is a better estimate than 75 but then again even 400 could be high for you (you're only 117 lbs, heavy people usually burn more calories doing the same thing).0 -
if you just sat and stared hard at the bike for 40 minutes you could burn 75 calories
400 is more likely if you broke a sweat
LOL! Nice... I agree with Dave that 400 is closer to being accurate.0 -
yeah, you're right, 75 does sound a bit ridiculous seeing as how I did sweat a lot. Thanks guys0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 421 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions