The Starvation (mode) Myth

Options
13567

Replies

  • IronSmasher
    IronSmasher Posts: 3,908 Member
    Options
    http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=/watch?v=VQ5zoZB0hdg&v=VQ5zoZB0hdg&gl=GB

    The whole program is interesting, but 5min onwards is relevant to this topic.

    The only problem I have is when people start claiming weight gain from eating too little. That just breaks all kinds of laws.
  • IronSmasher
    IronSmasher Posts: 3,908 Member
    Options
    I ate under 1200 calories and lost weight. Not only did I lose weight, I lost body fat and gained lean mass. So it can be done in a healthy manner.

    There's no such a thing as losing weight & gaining lean body mass at the same time. How could you gain body mass if the scale is pointing downwards? It only means you're losing fat but definitely don't gain any lean body mass.

    and you would be wrong. I had my stats done professionally, before and after.

    Were the stats in percentages?
  • MissFit0101
    MissFit0101 Posts: 2,382
    Options
    You can ingest a tapeworm to lose weight as well, definitely doesn't mean you'll be healthy!!!
  • jjblogs
    jjblogs Posts: 327 Member
    Options
    Hmmm....been watching these debates about starvation mode for a while. Got to thinking about people who fast. It doesn't seem to hurt them any. Fasting has been popular for numerous reasons...even lengthy fasts. I think it's very important to get all the nutrients you need to stay healthy. But, when dieting, fasting, or even cleansing the body, I don't think the lower calories are going to kill anyone unless you do it for very lengthy periods of time. The key is, when you do eat...eat healthy!
  • LuciaLongIsland
    LuciaLongIsland Posts: 815 Member
    Options
    Very informative. However, my friend has celiac, now a bowel inflammation. She had surgery. Every time she eats she get violently ill. She is down to 80 pounds and IS starving. I wish she would gain.
  • Fattack
    Fattack Posts: 666 Member
    Options
    And its posts like this where people get the idea of what they are doing to their bodies is okay. IT'S ABOUT GETTING THE NUTRIENTS YOU NEED. Most people will never get the nutrients they need on a 1000 calories a day diet or less. Maybe starvation mode isn't the right word but YOU ARE HURTING YOUR BODY. You NEED a certain amount of NUTRIENTS to make your body run. If you eat only 1000 calories and not meeting your nutrient goal, you really are hurting your body and you really will suffer in the end. I'm a nursing major and am in the process of taking my second nutrition class and I'm pretty sure both of my professors whom have their phd know what they're talking about when they tell us 1200 calories a day for women and 1500 for men. Also you should never be more than 1000 calories in debt for a single day. That is not healthy in any way shape or form. If you want to be in a deficit of 1000 calories for a day try being in a deficit of 500 with food and get up and go to the gym or take a walk to burn calories.

    Just sayin. I can't believe people post stuff like this and encourage people to under eat. Makes me sick.

    This
  • LuciaLongIsland
    LuciaLongIsland Posts: 815 Member
    Options
    Hmmm....been watching these debates about starvation mode for a while. Got to thinking about people who fast. It doesn't seem to hurt them any. Fasting has been popular for numerous reasons...even lengthy fasts. I think it's very important to get all the nutrients you need to stay healthy. But, when dieting, fasting, or even cleansing the body, I don't think the lower calories are going to kill anyone unless you do it for very lengthy periods of time. The key is, when you do eat...eat healthy!

    Yes!!! It needs to be a long time. That is what all my doctors said. Heavy people will not starve to death unless they deprive themselves for a Long time.
  • MaximalLife
    MaximalLife Posts: 2,447 Member
    Options
    And its posts like this where people get the idea of what they are doing to their bodies is okay. IT'S ABOUT GETTING THE NUTRIENTS YOU NEED. Most people will never get the nutrients they need on a 1000 calories a day diet or less. Maybe starvation mode isn't the right word but YOU ARE HURTING YOUR BODY. You NEED a certain amount of NUTRIENTS to make your body run. If you eat only 1000 calories and not meeting your nutrient goal, you really are hurting your body and you really will suffer in the end. I'm a nursing major and am in the process of taking my second nutrition class and I'm pretty sure both of my professors whom have their phd know what they're talking about when they tell us 1200 calories a day for women and 1500 for men. Also you should never be more than 1000 calories in debt for a single day. That is not healthy in any way shape or form. If you want to be in a deficit of 1000 calories for a day try being in a deficit of 500 with food and get up and go to the gym or take a walk to burn calories.

    Just sayin. I can't believe people post stuff like this and encourage people to under eat. Makes me sick.
    I leave people to their own failures.
    Remember, you were warned.
  • snookumss
    snookumss Posts: 1,451 Member
    Options
    I ate under 1200 calories and lost weight. Not only did I lose weight, I lost body fat and gained lean mass. So it can be done in a healthy manner.

    There's no such a thing as losing weight & gaining lean body mass at the same time. How could you gain body mass if the scale is pointing downwards? It only means you're losing fat but definitely don't gain any lean body mass.

    and you would be wrong. I had my stats done professionally, before and after.

    Were the stats in percentages?

    Seriously dont start a little argument. Its common knowledge early amateur lifters will gain muscle despite a deficit. Its only for noobs, doesnt last long but does happen quite often. Its how they lose inches but not lbsor even gain a bit at first.
  • IronSmasher
    IronSmasher Posts: 3,908 Member
    Options
    Sorry, I was hoping to settle one, not get involved.
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    Options
    thank you for posting this. the simple fact of the matter is that if you are eating less/consuming less cals and working out you will lose weight.
    Yes, but what kind of "weight" will it be?

    Lean body mass?
    Bottom line is you can find anybody to agree with your absurd notions of unhealthy weight loss..
    And if you want to fail, starve yourself.

    Go right ahead - be my guest.
    For those here who want to succeed and be fit for life, run from any diet that restricts food too much.

    MFP recommends 1 lb per week for a reason.
    Be smart and do this the right way. Don't cheat yourself.

    1 lb may not sound sexy, but in a year, that's 52 lbs - wow!

    It's not a race folks.

    Pretty much this.

    If you undereat, your body uses muscle for fuel. So, go ahead. It doesn't matter what you call it - eating too little regularly is stupid. And you won't necessarily lose weight on a calorie defecit as many people discover when the scale doesn't move. You need to get to the point of eating like a chronic bulemic or anorexic for that to work - and at that point, your body is literally eating itself.
  • kwest_4_fitness
    kwest_4_fitness Posts: 819 Member
    Options
    All I want to know is who among you is a medical doctor, registered nurse, dietician or nutritionist? And if you are any of the four, I congratulate you on being able to diagnose the entire population of the earth and prescribe the best way to lose weight based on internet studies.

    The WW post is an interesting read and is a science based study, as are many other studies that can be dug up. However, WW did not become the number one rated weight loss system by physically damaging massive numbers of its members. And yet it is correct to assume that their plan will not work for everyone.

    Everyone individual is different; different tastes, different metabolisms, different activity levels, different physical disorders, different commitment levels. Not a one of us is exactly the same. If I eat 1200 calories a day and do not consume back exercise calories and still lose 60 lbs, you may not. Simple as that. People who are not medically qualified to give advice (personal trainers are NOT medically qualified to give nutritional advice, sorry) should not be handing it out. :grumble:
  • emrys1976
    emrys1976 Posts: 213 Member
    Options
    It's an interesting article and, as a medical professional, I do value evidence and peer-reviewed studies and such. However, medical researchers, doctors, etc. put far too much emphasis on hard evidence (in the form of measurable numbers) and bodies are far too complex for that sort of simplification. I lost 50 lbs before starting with MFP by restricting my average intake to between 500 and 1000 cal per day (yes, I have an eating disorder and am working on that) then stopped losing weight for over a month, even though my intake was still only 1000-1300. My BMR is calculated at 1900 (TDEE at 2300) so there's no reason for me to not lose weight according to numbers. Yet, my body is stalling because it's more complex than all that. Besides, if you do research on CRON lifestyles, you will find a heap of valid studies that will tell you bodies do decrease their metabolism dramatically in very restrictive diets.
  • MissFit0101
    MissFit0101 Posts: 2,382
    Options
    All I want to know is who among you is a medical doctor, registered nurse, dietician or nutritionist? And if you are any of the four, I congratulate you on being able to diagnose the entire population of the earth and prescribe the best way to lose weight based on internet studies.

    The WW post is an interesting read and is a science based study, as are many other studies that can be dug up. However, WW did not become the number one rated weight loss system by physically damaging massive numbers of its members. And yet it is correct to assume that their plan will not work for everyone.

    Everyone individual is different; different tastes, different metabolisms, different activity levels, different physical disorders, different commitment levels. Not a one of us is exactly the same. If I eat 1200 calories a day and do not consume back exercise calories and still lose 60 lbs, you may not. Simple as that. People who are not medically qualified to give advice (personal trainers are NOT medically qualified to give nutritional advice, sorry) should not be handing it out. :grumble:

    It certainly doesn't take someone with a degree to know that not eating enough is just dumb.
  • Saftlad
    Saftlad Posts: 35 Member
    Options
    ... People who are not medically qualified to give advice (personal trainers are NOT medically qualified to give nutritional advice, sorry) should not be handing it out. :grumble:

    That may be true in USA, but in other parts of the world Personal Trainers ARE qualified to give nutritional advice. Would you be surprised to hear that most medical professionals are no more or less qualified to give nutritional advice than Personal Trainers?

    Being a nutritionist requires very little in the way of regulation or qualification. Being a dietician however does require a long and very intense university education, and is quite strictly regulated.
  • kwest_4_fitness
    kwest_4_fitness Posts: 819 Member
    Options
    There are two things everyone has.
    Opinions and *kitten*
    Which one are you gonna share with the world??
    Really, because something isn't right in line with YOUR point of view, doesn't make it wrong, just not right for you.
    Don't be mean to the girl just because she found support in something that feels wrong to you.

    Amen.
  • alyssamiller77
    alyssamiller77 Posts: 891 Member
    Options
    All I know is my own experience watching my wife battle a plateau. After losing almost 40+ pounds by cutting calories and working out, she hit a plateau. She hadn't been eating back her exercise calories and most days was just eating around 1200 total calories. She tried everything, adding more cardio, adding more strength training, being more disciplined about macros and sodium and such. None of it could get the scale or her shape to budge. Finally after much frustration she took my suggestion and started eating her exercise calories back. She's now eating a total of close to 2000 calories a day. After a little less than two weeks, her weight loss has taken off again.

    I know for a fact she was not going through the speculated periods of over-eating, she was very controlled and disciplined. The link between eating more and breaking her plateau was very clear. So call it starvation mode, or call it something else, I firmly believe it exists because I've watched it first hand.
  • Saftlad
    Saftlad Posts: 35 Member
    Options
    Of the references quoted, two make no mention of a return to prior levels of RMR, one was a study based on a 10 day period, and the other was unable to confirm or deny that basal metabolic rates were able to return to prior levels within a 12 week period.

    Now, I'm not saying that WW had an ulterior motive in finding or quoting these studies, however I suspect that it wouldn't be too difficult to respond to their findings with contrary studies.

    Take a look at some of the studies into the long-term effects of Bulimia, depressing stuff, especially around the loss of cardiac muscle and around the digestive tract.
  • thankyou4thevenom
    thankyou4thevenom Posts: 1,581 Member
    Options
    And its posts like this where people get the idea of what they are doing to their bodies is okay. IT'S ABOUT GETTING THE NUTRIENTS YOU NEED. Most people will never get the nutrients they need on a 1000 calories a day diet or less. Maybe starvation mode isn't the right word but YOU ARE HURTING YOUR BODY. You NEED a certain amount of NUTRIENTS to make your body run. If you eat only 1000 calories and not meeting your nutrient goal, you really are hurting your body and you really will suffer in the end. I'm a nursing major and am in the process of taking my second nutrition class and I'm pretty sure both of my professors whom have their phd know what they're talking about when they tell us 1200 calories a day for women and 1500 for men. Also you should never be more than 1000 calories in debt for a single day. That is not healthy in any way shape or form. If you want to be in a deficit of 1000 calories for a day try being in a deficit of 500 with food and get up and go to the gym or take a walk to burn calories.

    Just sayin. I can't believe people post stuff like this and encourage people to under eat. Makes me sick.

    This.
  • Marig0ld
    Marig0ld Posts: 671 Member
    Options
    There are articles to support anything you WANT to believe. That being said, people should eat when they are hungry, anyone can lose weight, they will gain it back if they starved themselves to get there, that's about as simple as it gets. 1200calories is base, if you feel comfortable there, great, but normal people who need a bit more to function like humans will require more, and still lose weight.

    Definitely this!