Exercising, No Weight Loss?
ashleynicol3
Posts: 187 Member
I’ve been dieting for a little over a month now. I’ve lost 10 pounds so far. I’ve been exercising the whole way through, but nothing too crazy. Last week, I started running, and I’ve been running at least a mile a day, sometimes more. I thought I’d see some weight loss due to the running – I only lost a pound last week, but I actually didn’t lose anything this week. 
At least I didn’t gain, but it’s still frustrating! I’m staying under 1200 calories per day, unless I run – then I eat some of the calories back if I’m hungry, but I’m not netting over 1200.
My boyfriend is telling me I am starting to look slimmer, and his sister told me the same thing yesterday, without even knowing I was dieting or exercising.
My boyfriend is really honest and straightforward, so I turn to him a lot to gauge how well I’m doing, because I know he’ll tell me what he truly sees. He told me he thinks I’m doing great and I should keep it up! His theory is that my weight may be staying the same because I am (hopefully) losing fat, but building muscle from the running. Any thoughts?
At least I didn’t gain, but it’s still frustrating! I’m staying under 1200 calories per day, unless I run – then I eat some of the calories back if I’m hungry, but I’m not netting over 1200.My boyfriend is telling me I am starting to look slimmer, and his sister told me the same thing yesterday, without even knowing I was dieting or exercising.
My boyfriend is really honest and straightforward, so I turn to him a lot to gauge how well I’m doing, because I know he’ll tell me what he truly sees. He told me he thinks I’m doing great and I should keep it up! His theory is that my weight may be staying the same because I am (hopefully) losing fat, but building muscle from the running. Any thoughts? 0
Replies
-
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
When you run you also tend to retain more water (assuming you are hydrating enough). Just stick with it and stick to the calories. Many times people assume they burn more than they do, and can eat more than they think. Even many people who train for marathons end up gaining weight during their training...
Running is not hurting your fat burn, trust me. Just keep counting those calories and you will be fine.0 -
I just came off of the best workout (40 min a day, 5 days a week) month of my life, and I did not "lose" an ounce! I did however loose inches...
I just stopped weighing myself.....its a downer, and I don't care what the damn thing says... its about me, feeling good.. moving, and eating healthy!!!
(ok ok.. so superbowl sunday was BAD! hehehehe ) back on track today! 0 -
First off, as a runner myself, I can tell you that running DOES burn alot of calories, but it all depends on your intensity. It all depends on how fast you are running, if you are running outside vs inside, incline or no incline...if you are running steady state or doing interval training. It can all vary...for example I can run for 1 hr and burn 800 calories. Your calorie burn will depend on alot of different variables.
Congrats on the weight loss so far. Remember, its a process and will take some time...we can put weight on very easily but it takes sometimes twice as long to lose it. I cannot see your diary to look at your food or exercise logs but you want to make sure that you are fueling your body and not starving your body in order to lose weight. As a society, we have this impression that if we eat less calories and workout more that we will lose weight. Yes you will lose weight but for how long? How long will you be able to keep the weight off? Wouldnt you want to eat more food and know that you can still lose weight AND know that you are fueling your body in the process? All Im saying is just make sure that you are eating the proper amount of calories, watch your sodium content and drink plenty of water.
There is nothing wrong with losing weight at a slower rate because in the long run you will benefit more from it and are more likely to KEEP the weight off and not gain it back if you do it slowly. But hang in there; it will happen.0 -
I’ve been dieting for a little over a month now. I’ve lost 10 pounds so far. I’ve been exercising the whole way through, but nothing too crazy. Last week, I started running, and I’ve been running at least a mile a day, sometimes more. I thought I’d see some weight loss due to the running – I only lost a pound last week, but I actually didn’t lose anything this week. At least I didn’t gain, but it’s still frustrating! I’m staying under 1200 calories per day, unless I run – then I eat some of the calories back if I’m hungry, but I’m not netting over 1200.
My boyfriend is telling me I am starting to look slimmer, and his sister told me the same thing yesterday, without even knowing I was dieting or exercising. My boyfriend is really honest and straightforward, so I turn to him a lot to gauge how well I’m doing, because I know he’ll tell me what he truly sees. He told me he thinks I’m doing great and I should keep it up! His theory is that my weight may be staying the same because I am (hopefully) losing fat, but building muscle from the running. Any thoughts?
Could be a number of things... you could be retaining a bit more water due to the increased muscle activity. You could be eating too little which could be slowing your rate of loss. I highly doubt you are building muscle on such a low cal intake, at least not enough to make any noticeable difference (either visually or on the scale).0 -
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
When you run you also tend to retain more water (assuming you are hydrating enough). Just stick with it and stick to the calories. Many times people assume they burn more than they do, and can eat more than they think. Even many people who train for marathons end up gaining weight during their training...
Running is not hurting your fat burn, trust me. Just keep counting those calories and you will be fine.
What??? The first statement is TOTALLY wrong. The rest is pretty good.
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.0 -
I’ve been dieting for a little over a month now. I’ve lost 10 pounds so far. I’ve been exercising the whole way through, but nothing too crazy. Last week, I started running, and I’ve been running at least a mile a day, sometimes more. I thought I’d see some weight loss due to the running – I only lost a pound last week, but I actually didn’t lose anything this week. At least I didn’t gain, but it’s still frustrating! I’m staying under 1200 calories per day, unless I run – then I eat some of the calories back if I’m hungry, but I’m not netting over 1200.
My boyfriend is telling me I am starting to look slimmer, and his sister told me the same thing yesterday, without even knowing I was dieting or exercising. My boyfriend is really honest and straightforward, so I turn to him a lot to gauge how well I’m doing, because I know he’ll tell me what he truly sees. He told me he thinks I’m doing great and I should keep it up! His theory is that my weight may be staying the same because I am (hopefully) losing fat, but building muscle from the running. Any thoughts?
Some replies have mentioned fluid being retained and this was the first thing that crossed my mind when reading your post, so do not get disheartened - at all!
WTG on starting running, it will not be long before you will up the distance or want to try interval training, both will result in more calories being burned. Interval training is excellent for burning calories and can often result in some good weight loss.
The main thing is, continue, just do not give up!0 -
I know I'm not burning a ton of calories. I use the iMapMyRun app on my iPhone to get an estimate of the calories I've burned, and since I'm only running a mile or two, it's usually no more than 200 or so calories, but I'm not always eating those back. I know it's not a lot, and I'm still pretty slow, but I'm running for around 15-20 minutes per day. My short-term goal is to work my way up to 30 minutes, no walking. I'm running outside, and trying to vary my route, so I experience different hills, terrain, etc. I guess I'll just keep going and watching what I eat! I'll make my diary public in the meantime. Thanks!0
-
The body's adaptation to running will cause some weight gain. How much depends on how much and how long you train.
- Increased blood volume
- Increased storage of glycogen and water in the muscle cells.
Those first two adaptation occur fairly rapidly.
In the longer term your body build more capillaries to carry oxygen to the muscles and increases mitocondrial density in the muscle cells. This also adds some weight.
All of these "weight gain" changes are good and are what happens when you get fit.0 -
The body's adaptation to running will cause some weight gain. How much depends on how much and how long you train.
- Increased blood volume
- Increased storage of glycogen and water in the muscle cells.
Those first two adaptation occur fairly rapidly.
In the longer term your body build more capillaries to carry oxygen to the muscles and increases mitocondrial density in the muscle cells. This also adds some weight.
All of these "weight gain" changes are good and are what happens when you get fit.
That's good information. Thanks!0 -
I'm a runner. Last summer I when I was training for a half marathon I didn't lose a lb...but I lost a dress size. I have played around, and for me I lose more lbs/inches if I eat most, if not all of my excercise calories. Its hard to wrap your brain around when you are in "lose weight" mode, but the more I fuel myself the higher my intensity levels are during my workouts and the better I look feel. Plus, losing 10 lbs in one month is alot!! Slow and steady wins the race0
-
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
When you run you also tend to retain more water (assuming you are hydrating enough). Just stick with it and stick to the calories. Many times people assume they burn more than they do, and can eat more than they think. Even many people who train for marathons end up gaining weight during their training...
Running is not hurting your fat burn, trust me. Just keep counting those calories and you will be fine.
What??? The first statement is TOTALLY wrong. The rest is pretty good.
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
What's so wrong with an 800-1200 calorie burn estimate for 7-10 miles? Seems legit to me. Let me ask you guys this, how do you know the exact calories you burn for a run, walk, bike, swim, or whatever? I'm a runner, biker, and swimmer and make guesses at this calories burn multiple times a day.
Keep sticking with it ashleynicol3 and do the best you can at guessing calories in/out.0 -
I know I'm not burning a ton of calories. I use the iMapMyRun app on my iPhone to get an estimate of the calories I've burned, and since I'm only running a mile or two, it's usually no more than 200 or so calories, but I'm not always eating those back. I know it's not a lot, and I'm still pretty slow, but I'm running for around 15-20 minutes per day. My short-term goal is to work my way up to 30 minutes, no walking. I'm running outside, and trying to vary my route, so I experience different hills, terrain, etc. I guess I'll just keep going and watching what I eat! I'll make my diary public in the meantime. Thanks!
It's perfectly ok to run as much as you can and then to walk for another 15-20 minutes to get a solid 40-45 minutes of a work out in. It will leave you with ~400 cals burned, which is more significant for weight loss... JUST KEEP MOVING! great job so far!0 -
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
When you run you also tend to retain more water (assuming you are hydrating enough). Just stick with it and stick to the calories. Many times people assume they burn more than they do, and can eat more than they think. Even many people who train for marathons end up gaining weight during their training...
Running is not hurting your fat burn, trust me. Just keep counting those calories and you will be fine.
What??? The first statement is TOTALLY wrong. The rest is pretty good.
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
What's so wrong with an 800-1200 calorie burn estimate for 7-10 miles? Seems legit to me. Let me ask you guys this, how do you know the exact calories you burn for a run, walk, bike, swim, or whatever? I'm a runner, biker, and swimmer and make guesses at this calories burn multiple times a day.
Keep sticking with it ashleynicol3 and do the best you can at guessing calories in/out.
I was referring to the "running doesn't burn many cals" statement. I guess what one person considers a lot of cals another person might not. I burn ~1200 cals doing 9 miles in 90 minutes... for me, that's a lot.
I have a HRM to measure cals burned. It's still ultimately an estimation of cals burned, but it's more accurate than MFP or whatever else.0 -
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
I have an HRM too, and I tend to burn roughly the same over a mile no matter the pace. A little more if I'm running but not a significant amount.
If you are talking distance rather than time, your total calories burned will be close per mile because even if the effort is lower, the time is proportionally longer...0 -
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
i don't know what kind of running you are doing, but i'll easily burn 400-500 calories in a 20 minute run.0 -
If you do retain water what is the best way to avoid that? Drink more water?0
-
edit0
-
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
I have an HRM too, and I tend to burn roughly the same over a mile no matter the pace. A little more if I'm running but not a significant amount.
I don't understand how that's possible. Cals burned is directly proportional to HR, so if your HR is significantly higher, you have to be burning significantly more cals, no? I guess if you walk is a REALLY fast walk and your run is a fairly slow jog then the effort could be similar enough to result it similar total cals burned.0 -
First off, as a runner myself, I can tell you that running DOES burn alot of calories, but it all depends on your intensity. It all depends on how fast you are running, if you are running outside vs inside, incline or no incline...if you are running steady state or doing interval training. It can all vary...for example I can run for 1 hr and burn 800 calories. Your calorie burn will depend on alot of different variables.
Congrats on the weight loss so far. Remember, its a process and will take some time...we can put weight on very easily but it takes sometimes twice as long to lose it. I cannot see your diary to look at your food or exercise logs but you want to make sure that you are fueling your body and not starving your body in order to lose weight. As a society, we have this impression that if we eat less calories and workout more that we will lose weight. Yes you will lose weight but for how long? How long will you be able to keep the weight off? Wouldnt you want to eat more food and know that you can still lose weight AND know that you are fueling your body in the process? All Im saying is just make sure that you are eating the proper amount of calories, watch your sodium content and drink plenty of water.
There is nothing wrong with losing weight at a slower rate because in the long run you will benefit more from it and are more likely to KEEP the weight off and not gain it back if you do it slowly. But hang in there; it will happen.
^^^agreed^^^^0 -
1) I would up your cals to about 1300, so that you can stay within your calorie range and still be over 1200- it's the lowest recommended amount you should be eating and it's hard to get caloric variety with your cals set that low (eg 1200 one day, 1300 the next). This will keep your body from getting good at functioning at any one caloric in take, and I find it helps keep loss pretty steady.
2) 1 lb a week is dead on. Some times though you just won't hit it, even if you are doing things right. There will be weeks where you lose 2 randomly. It happens- it will all even out in the end.
3) When you change or increase intensity on a workout your body retains water for muscle repair, which is why rest days are important. Don't try to "flush your system" or anything, it needs that water and it needs time to heal. Try running 3-5 times a week so your body has some recovery time.
Good luck!0 -
Well done you, now try running in possession of a pair of breasts! :bigsmile:Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
i don't know what kind of running you are doing, but i'll easily burn 400-500 calories in a 20 minute run.
Men generally burn far far more calories doing any given activity, at any given intensity. The very most I can burn in a 20 minute run would be around 150 calories, okay I'm shorter than average but nevertheless if someone's only running for 20 minutes, especially in their first week, they're not going to burn anything like as much as a fit guy who runs regularly.0 -
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
I have an HRM too, and I tend to burn roughly the same over a mile no matter the pace. A little more if I'm running but not a significant amount.
I don't understand how that's possible. Cals burned is directly proportional to HR, so if your HR is significantly higher, you have to be burning significantly more cals, no? I guess if you walk is a REALLY fast walk and your run is a fairly slow jog then the effort could be similar enough to result it similar total cals burned.
There's a difference, don't get me wrong, but walking 3.0 ish gets about 75/per mile (which is about 20 minutes) running 6.0 gets me about 95 (over 10 min). It goes up certainly, but not very significantly for 1 mile. The only difference is I'm spending 20+ min to get to that 100 cal range instead of 10.0 -
Men generally burn far far more calories doing any given activity, at any given intensity. The very most I can burn in a 20 minute run would be around 150 calories, okay I'm shorter than average but nevertheless if someone's only running for 20 minutes, especially in their first week, they're not going to burn anything like as much as a fit guy who runs regularly.
My personal experience says that's not true. The more out of shape you are the easier it is to get your HR up. Higher HR = more burned cals. If you don't have the drive or the metal toughness to get your HR up, then that's another story... but the more fit you are the harder you have to work to burn the same amount of cals.0 -
Yes you burn significantly more calories PER MINUTE when you're running, but this is about how many you burn PER MILE. You're burning far more calories, but for less time.Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
I have an HRM too, and I tend to burn roughly the same over a mile no matter the pace. A little more if I'm running but not a significant amount.
I don't understand how that's possible. Cals burned is directly proportional to HR, so if your HR is significantly higher, you have to be burning significantly more cals, no?
It's widely accepted that there is a calorie burn per mile based on variables such as weight, irrespective of speed, though IIRC the very latest research showed that running does in fact actually burn slightly more calories than walking, but nowhere near as great a difference as to be significant.0 -
Men generally burn far far more calories doing any given activity, at any given intensity. The very most I can burn in a 20 minute run would be around 150 calories, okay I'm shorter than average but nevertheless if someone's only running for 20 minutes, especially in their first week, they're not going to burn anything like as much as a fit guy who runs regularly.
My personal experience says that's not true. The more out of shape you are the easier it is to get your HR up. Higher HR = more burned cals. If you don't have the drive or the metal toughness to get your HR up, then that's another story... but the more fit you are the harder you have to work to burn the same amount of cals.
Dude, there are other things that factor into calorie burn than just HR and effort. Though both are important, physical make up is important. I'm pretty sure that girl is 119 lbs. There is a cap to what 119 lbs can burn in 20 min. That's just a fact. As a guy, presumably taller and heavier, you will burn more than her even if you both have identical HR's or if you both run until you vomit.0 -
Calorie burns are based on effort. If you walk 1 mile you won't burn nearly as much as you run. I burned 1200 cals the other day in a single run. Running most definitely can burn a ton of cals.
I have an HRM too, and I tend to burn roughly the same over a mile no matter the pace. A little more if I'm running but not a significant amount.
I don't understand how that's possible. Cals burned is directly proportional to HR, so if your HR is significantly higher, you have to be burning significantly more cals, no? I guess if you walk is a REALLY fast walk and your run is a fairly slow jog then the effort could be similar enough to result it similar total cals burned.
There's a difference, don't get me wrong, but walking 3.0 ish gets about 75/per mile (which is about 20 minutes) running 6.0 gets me about 95 (over 10 min). It goes up certainly, but not very significantly for 1 mile. The only difference is I'm spending 20+ min to get to that 100 cal range instead of 10.
Right - you're burning roughly 10 cals per minute running vs about 4 cals per minute walking. That's pretty significant.0 -
Wrong.The more out of shape you are the easier it is to get your HR up. Higher HR = more burned cals.
Higher HR = heart rate monitoring estimating higher calories on the basis of your seeming to be doing a lot of work.
A higher heart rate per se does not burn calories. If it did, Hollywood would be advertising horror movies with a "Scare yourself thin" marketing strategy. :bigsmile:0 -
Per minute. Not per mile. If you can muster the will to put in the time to complete the distance, overall the pace doesn't matter that much. Committment comes in all forms- time and intensity both count.0
-
Remember running doesn't burn all that many calories. I mean it's a great thing to do... but if you are running 7-10 miles a week, that's what... 800-1200 calories?
i don't know what kind of running you are doing, but i'll easily burn 400-500 calories in a 20 minute run.
I'm also burning 300-400 calories in a good 40 minute run, according to my HRM.
It's a great way to lose weight, good luck with it!0 -
Exactly. Or at least, I'm now only 117lb (my fish is swimming off the end of my ticker :bigsmile: ) and if I run / hike at exactly the same pace as my boyfriend, he consistently burns about 50% more calories than me, which is incredibly galling!Men generally burn far far more calories doing any given activity, at any given intensity. The very most I can burn in a 20 minute run would be around 150 calories, okay I'm shorter than average but nevertheless if someone's only running for 20 minutes, especially in their first week, they're not going to burn anything like as much as a fit guy who runs regularly.
My personal experience says that's not true. The more out of shape you are the easier it is to get your HR up. Higher HR = more burned cals. If you don't have the drive or the metal toughness to get your HR up, then that's another story... but the more fit you are the harder you have to work to burn the same amount of cals.
Dude, there are other things that factor into calorie burn than just HR and effort. Though both are important, physical make up is important. I'm pretty sure that girl is 119 lbs. There is a cap to what 119 lbs can burn in 20 min. That's just a fact. As a guy, presumably taller and heavier, you will burn more than her even if you both have identical HR's or if you both run until you vomit.
He weighs over 60lb more than me; if I carried a 60lb pack of bricks when hiking, perhaps I'd burn the same calories as he does...0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions