Someone decode this "eat your workout calories back" shiz fo
BetterCrazyThanLazy
Posts: 336
Supposedly, if my maintenance calories are at about 1500, then if I eat 1200 (that's what MFP calculated for me) I create a 300 deficit and if I work out I create another 200-300 (usually a lot more!) calories deficit, which makes it at least 500 calories a day x 7 days a week =3500 calories deficit to lose 2 lbs (correction - 1 lb a week)! I haven't lost anything in over 2 weeks even though my workouts are intense! "EAT more" just sounds crazy to me! It goes against all and everything I know or have done so far....
If I eat my work out calories back then I don’t create as much of a deficit. It works in theory but it doesn’t work in practice!!!
Help!!!
If I eat my work out calories back then I don’t create as much of a deficit. It works in theory but it doesn’t work in practice!!!
Help!!!
0
Replies
-
-
I don't eat mine back. It's suggested by MFP because your net calories should be a reasonable amount. If you were burning 800 calories a day with exercise and eating 1200, your net would be 400, which is quite low. But I average about 300-500 calories burned per day from exercise and I rarely eat them back. It totally depends on what works for you.0
-
it has worked for some people...i just do what works for me sometimes i eat them sometimes i dont...but i also try my best to stick within a range of 1200-1500 cals on most days....u might have to mix it up a bit and just find out what works for you ..perhaps only eating a percentage of them if your hungry...if not then omit them0
-
If you're not eating enough while working out intensely, your body actually goes into a little "starvation mode" because it's not getting the nutrients it needs, so in turn it hangs onto everything it can. This could be why you're not losing weight... I am doing P90X right now and it is SUPER intense, we burn about 500-600 calories in an hour workout. I am 5'4" and my goal is to lose weight and I am eating 1300 on my rest day and around 1800 on workout days. I hope this helps!! Good luck!!
0 -
3500 calorie deficit will cause one pound of weight loss. Have you been keeping your calories at 1200 for the past 2 weeks? Have you tried upping your calories to about 1400 a day?0
-
w00t!0
-
-
1500 sounds low for maintenance calories. Are you sure that isn't your basic metabolic rate without any activity factored in? How much do you weigh? I think if your deficit is only 300 to start with you could safely burn 500 calories and not eat all of them. I don't know that at your weight you should be aiming to lose two pounds a week though.0
-
-
It doesnt work because your body goes into starvation mode and tries to hang on to all of its fat stores. Its a great survivial mechanism when you go through times of plenty and times not so plenty when hunting in the woods. But now that we have all the food available to us all the time, our bodies dont know that and still kick into survival mode when it is not sure when the next meal is coming. If you up your calorie intake .... and preferably eat every 2-3 hrs, then your body will learn that there is always food coming and it will try to use it up before its next meal. Remember our bodies are made of hormones working together and a fine tuned system that wants to survive, not a mathmatical equation. Hope this helps at all and good luck!0
-
-
3500 calorie deficit will cause one pound of weight loss. Have you been keeping your calories at 1200 for the past 2 weeks? Have you tried upping your calories to about 1400 a day?
Yep, my bad! 1 lb a week! : )
And no, I havent, I am afraid! : )0 -
yeah I'm with you100%. I always thought more out than in = weight loss, why it all those extra calories for the sake of it. if i''m hungry then i'll eat but i ain't gonna force it! as you say it goes against everything we ever bin told, anyway i would find it hard to eat them all back if not impossible, eg yesterday i burnt 2020 through exercise my bmr says 1990 per day and i ended up with 1500+ left but if i had eaten them back i probably would've made myself ill!!0
-
I LIVE for my exercise calories. If I didn't eat them back, I would starve! All these people complaining about how much food they need to eat and they're not hungry (aka in starvation mode) make me angry. It's called "live a little and ENJOY"; shove a piece of cheese in your mouth- that's easy 100cal.0
-
It doesnt work because your body goes into starvation mode and tries to hang on to all of its fat stores. Its a great survivial mechanism when you go through times of plenty and times not so plenty when hunting in the woods. But now that we have all the food available to us all the time, our bodies dont know that and still kick into survival mode when it is not sure when the next meal is coming. If you up your calorie intake .... and preferably eat every 2-3 hrs, then your body will learn that there is always food coming and it will try to use it up before its next meal. Remember our bodies are made of hormones working together and a fine tuned system that wants to survive, not a mathmatical equation. Hope this helps at all and good luck!
This0 -
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/LorinaLynn/view/exercise-calories-explained-206876
You're already quite small and not far from your goal. You shouldn't aim to lose any more than .5# a week, so eat your calories and your exercise calories.0 -
Weight isn't the best measure of fitness which is why I think it shouldn't be used as a goal.0
-
ahhhhh, lol - I set my calorie intake to 1500 to make sure I am eating enough - I don't eat my workout calories and it makes me feel good - simply because I am mentally tricking myself... hey don't judge what ever works right?0
-
I am 5'5" and weigh 146 lbs. And actually, I try to not exceed 1000 net calories a day.0
-
I am 5'4" and weigh 142 and 1000 calories a day seems insane to me. I don't fully believe in "starvation mode" per se but I do think that you risk losing lean mass when you are just trying to burn off fat. Honestly I would take your calories up to 1200 on days where you don't work out and if you burn 500 maybe eat 1500 since that will still leave you with a good deficit. Once we get out of the "overweight" range though things change a bit and it's not just about that deficit but about what kinds of exercises we are doing and what kinds of food we are eating, not just about how little you can eat. Put good food into your body and you will get good results out. 1000 calories is not enough and would make it difficult to get all of your nutritional needs in.0
-
1500 sounds low for maintenance calories. Are you sure that isn't your basic metabolic rate without any activity factored in? How much do you weigh? I think if your deficit is only 300 to start with you could safely burn 500 calories and not eat all of them. I don't know that at your weight you should be aiming to lose two pounds a week though.
I am 5'5" and weigh 146 lbs. The profile pic is what I want to me, it's me about 6 years ago at around 130 lbs. My goal is to drop about 10 lbs.0 -
Weight isn't the best measure of fitness which is why I think it shouldn't be used as a goal.
I agree, but I can't adopt the mentality of "go by how your clothes fit" : )0 -
When I didn't eat mine back I lost nothing and was hungry all the time. If not eating them back doesn't work then try eating them back.
Example.
No weight loss, normal intake for me is about 1900
My 1/lb a week loss calorie intake is 1500
So I need 1500 for my body to do normal functions, nothing else
If I burn 300 calories from running then my body is running on 1200 calories for normal functions.
If I eat back my exercise calories I am running on a total of 1500 calories that day, not 1800.0 -
If you're not eating enough while working out intensely, your body actually goes into a little "starvation mode" because it's not getting the nutrients it needs, so in turn it hangs onto everything it can. This could be why you're not losing weight... I am doing P90X right now and it is SUPER intense, we burn about 500-600 calories in an hour workout. I am 5'4" and my goal is to lose weight and I am eating 1300 on my rest day and around 1800 on workout days. I hope this helps!! Good luck!!
I do P90X Plyo and Cardio and I do Insanity Max Interval Plyo and Cardo, I rotate them every day and run 3 miles on my "rest" days. How many calories to we actually burn on average with those workouts (assuming 45-60 min)???0 -
everybody is differnt. bmrs are never fully accurate they are just a rough guideline as peoples m'tabs work diffs. so yeppp as long as youre eating more than 1000cals a day i wouldnt stress, if you start to notice youre loooosing weight just add a few cals into your diet. and things will level out.0
-
Get yourself a HRM. That is a good way to gage.0
-
EAT. THEM.
MFP has a deficit already worked into your net, so if you hit it exactly, you are at the right deficit to lose without stressing your body and metabolism out, which causes weight loss to stall. So even if you burn 1000, and you are eating 2200 to hit your net of 1200, you are STILL at a deficit. Less sometimes is NOT more. Sometimes it means more on the scale. Not kidding. I have been there.
EAT.0 -
It's all estimation, but an HRM will provide the best estimation.I do P90X Plyo and Cardio and I do Insanity Max Interval Plyo and Cardo, I rotate them every day and run 3 miles on my "rest" days. How many calories to we actually burn on average with those workouts (assuming 45-60 min)???0 -
Supposedly, if my maintenance calories are at about 1500, then if I eat 1200 (that's what MFP calculated for me) I create a 300 deficit and if I work out I create another 200-300 (usually a lot more!) calories deficit, which makes it at least 500 calories a day x 7 days a week =3500 calories deficit to lose 2 lbs (correction - 1 lb a week)! I haven't lost anything in over 2 weeks even though my workouts are intense! "EAT more" just sounds crazy to me! It goes against all and everything I know or have done so far....
If I eat my work out calories back then I don’t create as much of a deficit. It works in theory but it doesn’t work in practice!!!
Help!!!
The exercise calories are an estimate and in my belief highly inflated. HRM are still guessing athough should be more accurate than MFP as they are using your exercising heart rate in the equation. Try eating back half of what the calculators suggest you have burnt. You'll feel it if that's too little or too much0 -
Weight isn't the best measure of fitness which is why I think it shouldn't be used as a goal.
I agree, but I can't adopt the mentality of "go by how your clothes fit" : )
It's difficult at first, but eventually liberating.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions