Will walking make a difference?

Running burns the calories faster. Apparently walking and running 5km won't differ much in calories burned (I haven't tried this out, and I also haven't got the scientific research for it). But to run 5km takes less time than to walk 5km. Plus running works more on your cardio.

About replacing 30 day shred with walking.. No, you wont get the same results. You might walk until you burn the same calories as with the 30 day shred, but you have got to remember that you do a lot of strength training with the shred. This will tone you more AND give you a higher metabolism.

I have an abdominal hernia. Needing to go in for third repair surgery this summer. Doc said, you need to lose 80 lbs before the surgery. I asked what she recommended to help me with that. She said, I have no idea... with the hernia, all you can do is walk. This does not discourage me, however, since one of my dearest friends lost 100 lbs over 30 months JUST by walking and changing his eating habits. Once he dropped the weight, he became concerned about fitness, started running and lifting, and is now sculpted beyond all expectations. But, yeah... walking was how he shed the pounds. He walked, sometimes a couple of blocks, sometimes a couple of miles, but every day, rain or shine.

During this cutting cycle my "cardio" has consisted 2-3 45 min walks. Since January I have lost over 25lbs. I suggest you read this article to understand the benefits.

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/the_best_damn_cardio_article_period

Last year at this time I weighed around 300 lbs (300-305....didn't really want to know the real number). At 6'2" and rather broad built, my healthy weight is in the 230-240 range. Still, 300-ish was a horrible weight for me. At the time I didn't really do anything with my diet, but I got a dog in late March last year and started walking him daily. I dropped down to 275 over the summer while still eating all types of crap. During the Fall and Winter my weight has been hovering around 280, which is why I got on MFP. Now understand that my walks with my dog are 1.5 - 4 miles everyday, and I aim for about a 3 mph pace. This is not an easy stroll. I just got a heart rate monitor/gps watch (garmin FR60) and on a 40 minute, 2 mile long walk it said I burned 250 calories. It's not what I can burn doing an intense workout in the gym or if I'm hiking in the mountains near me, but it's not a small amount either.

Walking is a great way to start loosing weight and get your muscles and joints used to exercising due to the low impact. Going from the couch to running a 5k is a good way to hurt your knees. I dropped 25 lbs in 3-4 months doing nothing but walking a couple miles a day, everyday.

Honestly, it's really all about your calories. People are often drawn to the idea of running because of the potentially large amount of calories at stake. I was drawn to running because of the cool clothes, actually, but you get the point. If your BMR is 1200, you could either (a) run 8 miles to burn 800 calories and eat 800 calories' worth of chocolate on...Valentine's Day, or (b) run 8 miles to burn 800 calories and eat 1000 calories to have a 1000 calorie/day deficit because you want to lose 2 lbs/week to fit into a red dress on....Valentine's Day. I did my own research on this very question - walking vs running vs nothing vs diet only - and my conclusion was that exercise really didn't matter (do your own research! Google scholar!). For that matter, many anorexics simply keep their calories restricted and do little exercise.

To echo a previous poster, your choice of activity needs to be something you enjoy and something sustainable (just like diet). Personally, I run. Sometimes. Today I got off my bum but many days I am just too exhausted. I would rather take a walk (much more enjoyable) or forego rice at dinner. When I am tired and have a lot to do, running stresses me out. Why would I exercise to improve my health if it creates stress because of the time and energy that is involved in maintaining it every week? Strength training is the least enjoyable of all for me. It makes my head hurt and I have to drag my phone, wallet, keys, jacket, and weights all over the gym just for a few reps. To add insult to injury, I retain water because my muscles swell and I can't fit into my cool runner clothes the next day. Why do I do it? Well...the same reason you probably asked your question. Someone said it's healthy. But I don't exercise every day or even every week. Some weeks I completely skip out on running or walking. I happily leave out a portion of grains or fats in exchange. I met my monthly strength training quota last night.

Just for the record, I am 5'5", 122 lbs, 18-20% body fat. Pretty competitive stats for someone who doesn't take exercise too seriously.

Walking is great exercise! It's how I've lost my weight so far. I also don't take a stroll through the park. I do intervals on the treadmill at the gym. I do a lot of walking on an incline and try to vary my speed. When I'm done I'm sweating and usually burn 400+ calories in the hour I walk. The most important thing is to be sure you're getting your heart rate up. I know right now my body couldn't handle running. Not sure that it ever will be able to handle it so I enjoy my walking. I also do weight training 3x's a week on top of my walking. I lift heavy and I know that has helped with toning and weight loss for me. I decided long ago that I want to pick an exercise I will be able to do for the rest of my life and walking seems to be the most basic of things to do. I hope I'm still going for a daily walk in my 80's and 90's, permitting I'm fortunate enough to live to be that old. Good luck in what ever exercise you decide to do!!

Honestly, it's really all about your calories. People are often drawn to the idea of running because of the potentially large amount of calories at stake. I was drawn to running because of the cool clothes, actually, but you get the point. If your BMR is 1200, you could either (a) run 8 miles to burn 800 calories and eat 800 calories' worth of chocolate on...Valentine's Day, or (b) run 8 miles to burn 800 calories and eat 1000 calories to have a 1000 calorie/day deficit because you want to lose 2 lbs/week to fit into a red dress on....Valentine's Day. I did my own research on this very question - walking vs running vs nothing vs diet only - and my conclusion was that exercise really didn't matter (do your own research! Google scholar!). For that matter, many anorexics simply keep their calories restricted and do little exercise.

To echo a previous poster, your choice of activity needs to be something you enjoy and something sustainable (just like diet). Personally, I run. Sometimes. Today I got off my bum but many days I am just too exhausted. I would rather take a walk (much more enjoyable) or forego rice at dinner. When I am tired and have a lot to do, running stresses me out. Why would I exercise to improve my health if it creates stress because of the time and energy that is involved in maintaining it every week? Strength training is the least enjoyable of all for me. It makes my head hurt and I have to drag my phone, wallet, keys, jacket, and weights all over the gym just for a few reps. To add insult to injury, I retain water because my muscles swell and I can't fit into my cool runner clothes the next day. Why do I do it? Well...the same reason you probably asked your question. Someone said it's healthy. But I don't exercise every day or even every week. Some weeks I completely skip out on running or walking. I happily leave out a portion of grains or fats in exchange. I met my monthly strength training quota last night.

Just for the record, I am 5'5", 122 lbs, 18-20% body fat. Pretty competitive stats for someone who doesn't take exercise too seriously.

Umm nutrition makes you healthy. Weight training is for body composition. Sure there are health benefits...

I was told that walking on an incline on treadmill (WITHOUT holding on) was one of the best ways to trim waist area so I do that - but I also walk outside which is great for my mood as well as calorie burn - I put on a pair of old boots and off road and vary my route so there is always something new to look at. It's a great de-stressor and so suppresses the production of glucocorticoids (the rest and digest hormones that have you craving for high fat/ high sugar snacks)

People that walk distances slowly are still burning calories. They may not burn as many calories as they would if they were in their target zone.
Someone could have a health condition that prevents them from going faster.
When I started a little over a month ago I was a slow SLOW walker. I'm talking people in their 60's would lap me at the park.
My left knee just wouldn't let me move any faster. Even walking at that slow pace would have me in tears after a mile or two.
Then I discovered Walk Away The Pounds and I walk ALOT faster now. I've done 50 miles this month already. I still can't run, and realiscally I have a lot more weight to lose before I would try. I don't think running is for everyone.
So, yes, I believe walking will make a big difference, especially to someone who is really out of shape. They can always work their way up, more time, more distance, more speed.
My goal is to be jogging by may.

yes you can walk and loose weight. However after a certain amount of time your fitness does and will improve, and you will find that walking is not enough.
I find cardio wise walking doesn't cut it. I'd rather run or do circuit training.

Walking is my main form of exercise. A few years back I lost 40 kilograms by changing my diet and walking. I went from about 110 kilos to 70 kilos. Walking was the only thing I could do at the time as I was so unfit. As I got fitter I also did once a week water aerobics class.

When I stopped walking and started to increase my calorie intake I put some of that weight back on. I am here now to get back to my goal. Walking and watching my calorie intake are my main method and I do two classes of Rhee Tae Kwon do a week as well because now I can actually lift my legs.

Running burns the calories faster. Apparently walking and running 5km won't differ much in calories burned (I haven't tried this out, and I also haven't got the scientific research for it). But to run 5km takes less time than to walk 5km. Plus running works more on your cardio.

About replacing 30 day shred with walking.. No, you wont get the same results. You might walk until you burn the same calories as with the 30 day shred, but you have got to remember that you do a lot of strength training with the shred. This will tone you more AND give you a higher metabolism.

This was really helpful! I find it very interesting that the calories burned aren't too far apart, hmm.
I don't plan on replacing the 30 Day Shred with walking, just curious haha. So thank you!

Would it be appropriate to assume that adding 30-60 minutes 2-4 times a week on top of the 30DS would be a good idea?

it would be quite appropriate to add some walking to your routine... it can also be relaxing

Im a walker, i hate running. Im not designed for it, despite what anyone says, my bloodline is the reason we invented the bow and arrow etc.

Run? not unless something with teeth is chasing me, big teeth.

Walking like any regular activity makes a lot of difference. You dont have to run a marathon to lose weight, you have to do more and eat less on whatever scale suits you.