Is the "wrong" way the right way?

I am looking for advice from those of you who have have longterm significant success.
Thank for for a few minuets of your time!


I am following the program, exercising, and yes eating my exercise calories back. I know the arguments to do so, and they seems sound not wanting your body to go into starvation mode. But... I am struggling to loss the smallest fraction of a pound and I have noticed that everyone who seems to really be losing weight , even for a prolonged period of time, usually have 900-2000 calories left over at the end of the day. If this is what is getting the amazing results and people are keeping the weight off, than should I switch? I am on the 1200 cal regiment (and I freely volunteer that I have gotten weary and had my share of "off" days). I usually burn 300 to 400 cals a day, and would have to eat only 500-600cal to have 1000 left over each day. It seems that this should equal starvation mode and a unsustainable weight loss, or is this a poor usumption and is actually the way to success on MPF? The evidence seems stacked towards 1000cal under method.

Please let me know what really worked for you.

you should never eat less than 1200 calories a day

do you know your BMR and TDEE numbers ?

making your diary public will help others to help you

do you do any strength training???

But... I am struggling to loss the smallest fraction of a pound and I have noticed that everyone who seems to really be losing weight , even for a prolonged period of time, usually have 900-2000 calories left over at the end of the day.

This is certainly not the case for me, or for many others. Anyone with that much left at the end of the day is headed for a world of trouble in the long run. I frequently have only a few calories, or at most a hundred or so left at the end of the day, and I have lost 34lb and kept it off, even through a two-month plateau (which I seem to have finally broken by increasing my calories).

I am on the 1200 cal regiment (and I freely volunteer that I have gotten weary and had my share of "off" days). I usually burn 300 to 400 cals a day, and would have to eat only 500-600cal to have 1000 left over each day. It seems that this should equal starvation mode and a unsustainable weight loss, or is this a poor usumption and is actually the way to success on MPF? The evidence seems stacked towards 1000cal under method.

Please let me know what really worked for you.

Try setting your calories at the lose 1lb mark, or figure out your BMR online, and eat that plus exercise cals, and see how you get on for a bit - I've found that shocking the body too much is a sure path to frustration, whereas taking it slowly gets you there in the end. Too few calories will not just produce an unsustainable loss, it will provoke your body into hanging on to everything it possibly can as it perceives a time of famine, when fat deposits are the only thing that will keep you alive.

How long have you been doing this, by the way? Sometimes losses are not immediate. I quite often don't lose anything for a few weeks, and then lose 2-3kg seemingly overnight. It might also be worth looking at your measurements to see if you're losing any inches - the scale is not the only measure, and can sometimes be deceptive in terms of your achievements and health.

Hey hon! I am already going to tell you you are going to get people here who are going to say "OMG DONT DO THAT YOU WILL KILL YOUR BODY!" And while I wont say that, and will say that I did lose weight the "wrong" way, I would NOT advise doing it the same. Here is why (and this is why I won't go back to it no matter how easy it feels in my head). My body never went into starvation mode. From all the research I have done, starvation mode is a term thrown around when people mean to say that your metabolism is going to slow down dramatically. Starvation mode however, IS real, but it typically only takes place under a certain body fat percent (which most of the population does NOT meet). While I was eating at about 300-500 calories a day, as I said, I lost significant weight. However, I lost a LOT of strength, developed terribly disordered and obsessive eating, became a slave to the scale, and wasnt satisified with myself even after I got where I thought I wanted. I worked out 5-6 times a week which probably helped me lose as well... and after a while when I realized I would have to increase my calories, I had to do so VERY slowly. On top of that, I eat vegan and was eating mostly veggies ANYWAY while I was that low (to keep my cals low to begin with) and kept that mindset when I added cals. Most people would probably gain the weight back even if they slowly upped calories....and the worst part? I became OBSESSSED with food when I was that low. OB-SESSED. And I would cry because I couldnt ever eat it. I couldnt ever go out to eat, and most people end up having HUGE binges that low.

My suggestion would be this... don't eat back your exercise cals. Just don't. They may be overestimated anyway. I typically dont even log mine on here because of the type of exercise I do. On top of that, depending on your weight and height you might be in a huge deficit already. My BMR is 1300 before exercise, so for me to have a significant deficit I 1. HAVE to exercise and be active. 2. Consulted with my DOCTOR who advised me that it would be okay for ME (4'10 and 120 lbs) to eat no less than 1k in calories... and that is only a couple times a week.

I do something called Calorie Cycling and so far I have still continued a steady 1 lb loss a week. I am at a point that this may slow down but you might want to look into it. It will give you the high and low days so that it is easier to stick with.

The hardest part for me on a daily basis is obsessing now about how I look, and not being satisfied and wanting to just go back to eating 450 cals a day. I mean thats how I lost isnt it? The cons of that completely outweigh the pros--- especially how AFRAID of food I was. Do you know that last night I was making my girlfriend a sandwhich for lunch today, and felt GUILTY eating like a teaspoon of peanut butter when I licked the spoon? Or the fact that even THINKING about eating pasta makes me feel GUILTY. Those feeling SUCK and I shouldnt HAVE to feel that way. You will get there but remember it didnt take you 5 months to gain all the weight and it wont take you 5 months to lose it.

Look at WHAT you are eating and not just the calorie goal. Is it high in sodium? If you go over your sodium you will DEFINITELY not only RETAIN water but excess sodium gets stored as fat. All that low fat crap you see? Not worth it. Go with organic and whole fats. Make dairy and processed breads only 25% of your diet at MOST, Veggies and Protein 50% depending on if it is meat protein or not. If it is meat keep it to 25% of your diet... dont deprive yourself but I saw a girl on here who was eating at pizza hut and taco bell all the time losing weight. But honestly when she gets where I am now (the last 10-15 lbs of stubborn fat) she is going to have a HELL of a time getting it off. And really, is she any more healthier just because the scale says she is lighter?

Health is not just weight. Forget the numbers.... just eat HEALTHY, dont believe labels that have to prove to you they are healthy. Eat raw whole foods... get adequate protein and work out. That's it. Weight loss is simple. Us people make it complicated.

And please, don't eat 500 cals a day, it's not worth what comes with it.

I started with a 1330 allowance when I started MFP in January, but after losing 10lbs I resubmitted my target and it dropped my allowance to 1200. I actually found losing weight a lot easier with the 1330 target, so it is not always a case of the less you consume, the more you lose )

Just from reading your post, I'm guessing you're most likely underestimating what you eat and/or overestimating your exercise calories.

The HR monitor doesn't know my weight, MPF does, it seems like that would make MPF more accurate.

You need to find a different HR then. If it doesn't take your weight into account, it's not going to give you an accurate calorie readout. MFP also drastically overestimates. It's great that you're working out, but I can tell you that for most of us, we're probably not doing as much as we want to think we are.

And/or underestimates (MFP) - it really is just a guesstimate based on averages. MY HRM/pedometer often show a much higher burn than MFP, and they have more information to do it from. The point is, you need to find an accurate HRM to get a reasonable reading.

play with it is my advice. Try just eating half your exercise calories back for a week or two. I do think just 1200 calories only without eating your exercise calories is too hard long term , I try it and always end up eating more.
P:ersonally walking is great at first but your body gets really used to it, what about if you wear a hrm during your DVD and just log those calories, forget about logging the walking calories.