Today's Hot Topic

124

Replies

  • hiker282
    hiker282 Posts: 983 Member
    Depends if they can squat their own body weight. My opinion is based solely on this factor.

    lol...careful...don't want to start another flame war!
  • Tiggerrick
    Tiggerrick Posts: 1,078 Member
    I'd put it in all their poopers.
    Panda for the WIN
  • sjebert
    sjebert Posts: 212 Member
    3 for me
  • SofaKingRad
    SofaKingRad Posts: 1,592 Member
    #2.
  • SofaKingRad
    SofaKingRad Posts: 1,592 Member
    Poor number 1! There is nothing wrong with her. Stop small hating.

    I would love to look like # 2, but I dont have curves. I look very similar to # 1

    Then pick No. 1!
  • Captian_Dathon
    Captian_Dathon Posts: 73
    Why are there no men this "attractiveness" line-up?
  • TanyaCurtis
    TanyaCurtis Posts: 630
    2 Looks Best!!
  • SixCatFaerie
    SixCatFaerie Posts: 690 Member
    3! For what I want to look like & for what I (& my Mr.) find attractive. :bigsmile:
  • AtticusFinch
    AtticusFinch Posts: 1,262 Member
    Personally I like No 3, but it would all depend on which could present the tastiest Taco :tongue:
  • elimendoza31
    elimendoza31 Posts: 359 Member
    #3 definitely - she's gorgeous!! :)
    I so agree with you!!!! :flowerforyou:
  • onequirkygirl
    onequirkygirl Posts: 303 Member
    Eh...I want to pick 2, but she's too apple-shaped for me. 3 has more of a defined waist but is at a higher body fat than I'd like. I would pick number 3's proportions at the size of 2.
  • ki4yxo
    ki4yxo Posts: 709 Member
    I'll take them all.


    At the same time.



    I think you need a million bucks to make that happen.
    Well, the type of chicks that'd double up on a dude like
    me do.
  • shammxo
    shammxo Posts: 1,432 Member
    All of them... At once.

    I know someone else already said this. But, seriously.
  • memcd911
    memcd911 Posts: 230 Member
    None of them have the definition in their legs that I want, but at least 2 and 3 have boobs.

    I'd be eternally lost without Betty and Veronica.

    Somewhere around 2, or a little heavier, with more muscle definition would be a perfect 10 for me.
    I thought I was the only one who named my girls. Mine are Freddy & Jason.

    Oh, and I agree with the leg thing - muscles are awesome.

    YOUR muscles are awesome!
    And ^5 on the names. :o)
  • CoryIda
    CoryIda Posts: 7,870 Member
    None of them have the definition in their legs that I want, but at least 2 and 3 have boobs.

    I'd be eternally lost without Betty and Veronica.

    Somewhere around 2, or a little heavier, with more muscle definition would be a perfect 10 for me.
    I thought I was the only one who named my girls. Mine are Freddy & Jason.

    Oh, and I agree with the leg thing - muscles are awesome.

    YOUR muscles are awesome!
    And ^5 on the names. :o)
    Awww, thanks!

    There is a reason for the names, btw - one has a tattoo, which is like a mask, and that is Jason. The other has some scars on it from a sharp object, and that is Freddy. :bigsmile:
  • kaylammurphy
    kaylammurphy Posts: 63
    I kinda have a thing for 3, but if she were taken I would be ok with 2 ;)
  • gmctech
    gmctech Posts: 104 Member
    #2 or #3 for me..... The toss up would be personality... I'm equally attracted to both of them.
  • Trail_Addict
    Trail_Addict Posts: 1,340 Member
    None of them!

    I happen to know that... #1 has a blue waffle... #2 prefers guys with mullets... and #3 does unspeakable things for Klondike bars!
  • elenathegreat
    elenathegreat Posts: 3,988 Member
    Why are there no men this "attractiveness" line-up?

    YES!! Bring on the Dudes!!
  • KaleidoscopeEyes1056
    KaleidoscopeEyes1056 Posts: 2,996 Member
    Can I just have all three of them? They're all gorgeous!
  • glitterpiss
    glitterpiss Posts: 113
    3! Did you see those boobs and thighs? Gorgeous!
  • FitJoani
    FitJoani Posts: 2,173 Member
    2 or 3...3 particularly. I like my men with meat on their bones, so thicker gals are hotter as far as women go to me
  • theoriginaljayne
    theoriginaljayne Posts: 559 Member
    Personally, I prefer #1.
  • Sapporo
    Sapporo Posts: 693 Member
    I'll take them all too!
    All 3 are georgous.
  • HikeRunLift
    HikeRunLift Posts: 70
    ehh.. I like thick thighs and wide hips, so it has to be number 3
  • Darkskinned88
    Darkskinned88 Posts: 1,177 Member
    i'll take 3....twice lol
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    Honestly, 1 or 2. I've never really liked the fuller look on men or women.
  • mznisaelaine
    mznisaelaine Posts: 2,262 Member
    I once was a 1 :( I was satisfied at a 2 when I was a 2..... I became a 3..... Im currently is in between 2 and 3.. Probably a 2.75.... I would like to be a 2 again.... Maybe a 2.25
  • Niki130
    Niki130 Posts: 85
    Depends if they can squat their own body weight. My opinion is based solely on this factor.

    Best. Answer. Ever.

    My thoughts exactly. :)
  • Karrix
    Karrix Posts: 288
    #2 is closest to my body type. :tongue:
This discussion has been closed.

Categories