My problem with eating back exercise calories.
o_delaisse
Posts: 193 Member
I understand that a lot of people don't find it necessary to eat back their exercise calories while a lot of people firmly believe it's the way forward, but the debate and understanding the reasons aren't my problem.
My problem with eating back my exercise calories is that I WANT to, but I'm too scared.
Fact is, I can't afford a HRM. I don't know how many calories I burn, and I've found people on here generally agree that estimates can be very high.
So what now? I've spent the past month working on increasing my food intake, and after a long time of drastically undereating, this week I finally hit my BMR. According to estimates, however, I'm still netting at 1000, or a little under.
I've just started running (I'm dreadful at it, but someone on here talked about how she ran a ten minute mile and she inspired me - I run / crawl a 12.5 min mile (don't laugh!) and according to MapMyRun (which calculates by speed and distance measured by Google Maps) I'll burn about 150 calories for 24 mins. Then, my cross-trainer - it says I burn 300 for 60 mins, and the estimate says 701 cals, so I've been averaging the two to get about 490/500 or so.
But really, what does this mean? When I "run" (a good part is walked!), am I *really* burning 150? And the cross-trainer - a good work out for me is 20km in 60 mins, which leaves me warm and slightly sweaty - not exhausted, red hot, and dripping in sweat - is that really 490 calories?
If I found that I was *really* netting at 1200 I'd be so pleased and would happily eat a little more to net at my BMR. But what if I take those estimates as fact, eat it all back, and end up gaining?
I want to do this, but honestly, I don't know what I'm doing.
So how do all you people who don't have a HRM manage this?
My problem with eating back my exercise calories is that I WANT to, but I'm too scared.
Fact is, I can't afford a HRM. I don't know how many calories I burn, and I've found people on here generally agree that estimates can be very high.
So what now? I've spent the past month working on increasing my food intake, and after a long time of drastically undereating, this week I finally hit my BMR. According to estimates, however, I'm still netting at 1000, or a little under.
I've just started running (I'm dreadful at it, but someone on here talked about how she ran a ten minute mile and she inspired me - I run / crawl a 12.5 min mile (don't laugh!) and according to MapMyRun (which calculates by speed and distance measured by Google Maps) I'll burn about 150 calories for 24 mins. Then, my cross-trainer - it says I burn 300 for 60 mins, and the estimate says 701 cals, so I've been averaging the two to get about 490/500 or so.
But really, what does this mean? When I "run" (a good part is walked!), am I *really* burning 150? And the cross-trainer - a good work out for me is 20km in 60 mins, which leaves me warm and slightly sweaty - not exhausted, red hot, and dripping in sweat - is that really 490 calories?
If I found that I was *really* netting at 1200 I'd be so pleased and would happily eat a little more to net at my BMR. But what if I take those estimates as fact, eat it all back, and end up gaining?
I want to do this, but honestly, I don't know what I'm doing.
So how do all you people who don't have a HRM manage this?
0
Replies
-
I can't afford an HRM either. I eat back only 1/2 of my exercise cals, just in case. When I walk or do C25K, I use RunKeeper. It isn't the most accurate, but it seems to be better than MFP estimates. When I start doing more running, I'll switch to Nike+ GPS since it's geared for running, and it knows my gender/height/weight/age.0
-
I don't have a HRM at the moment (however you can get them relatively cheap on websites like Amazon) so I go by what the tracker on this website tells me.
What I do is say I do 45 minutes on my stationary bike... I will only enter 30 minutes and at a lower intensity that I have actually done. I like to log the actual information in the "notes" section on the tracker just so I know what I've really done. This gives less calories that I eat back. I know some people will only eat 2/3 of their exercise calories back to take into account any errors.
I would suggest trying it out. Put in less time and less intensity (or pace) than you've actually done. Not by a huge amount but than you'll get a bit more accurate of a number. Try it for a few weeks and see what happens.
This weight loss thing is a lot of trial and error.0 -
What do you do? Set up your calorie goals according to your TDEE and accounting for your activity level - that's exactly what I'm doing.
Hit up the website here;
http://www.fat2fitradio.com/tools/
Use the Military Bodyfat Calculator and then the Calories and Basal Metabolic Rate calculator to find your ideal calorie plan.0 -
I can only speak from my experience in the last 3-4 months. I have been eating back my exercise calories and I go by the calories burned that is shown on mapmyrun until I can get a FitBit to be more accurate. I have steadily lost at least a pound a week the whole time and I usually eat all my daily calories to include my exercise calories or come between 50-100 shy. I do that mostly to make up for the weekends since I do not log my food or limit what I eat on the weekends. When I was shorting myself 300-400 a day I was miserable, nasty and sluggish. Food is not your enemy. Don't be afraid!0
-
bump0
-
I was never sure and at around half of what was said for fear it was way off. I now have a HRM and have found it to be sort of off. Every time I work out it's different as sometimes I work harder, sometimes I'm trying to take it a bit easy. Sometimes I burn more than it suggests, sometimes half.
I thought I would never get one and from reading the posts I could only see the £60+ models of the Polar were the only decent hrm to get but I ended up getting one for £12.99 from Lloyds that works really well. If you are really worried and would feel better I'd suggest saving up for this one. I've found it to be easy to use.
http://www.lloydspharmacy.com/en/lloydspharmacy-watch-and-heart-rate-monitor-352810 -
I got an HRM, but honestly, as far as I understand, if you have your activity level set properly for your TDEE, you shouldn't need to eat back your calories.
Multipliers for your BMR to get to your TDEE:
1.2 for Sedentary - desk job and little to no exercise
1.375 for Lightly Active - light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk
1.55 for Moderately Active - moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk
1.725 for Very Active - hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk
1.9 for Extremely Active - hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or training
So for example, if your BMR is 1300 and you work out a couple times a week, you should eat 1,788 a day and not log/eat back exercise.
If you use this method you should not need to eat back your calories unless you do activities above and beyond your multiplier activity.
OR, you can be conservative and just eat back like 25% or 50% of your "burned calories" along with your BMR.0 -
I have a Fitbit pedometer, not a HRM. It's still expensive but so worth it. Syncs up nicely with MFP.
RunKeeper is a decent app and it's numbers were very close to my fitbit as far as distance and time went. I tried a while back to compare. So knowing time, distance and speed should help you get a decent exercise calorie reading.
I try to eat some of my exercise calories back. If I'm hungry, I eat them.... if I'm not hungry or full even, I only go to 1200 net calories for the day. If I go lower than that I don't have a good week weight loss wise.0 -
I don't use a HRM because I'm asthmatic and have to use medications and caffeine, which will increase my heart rate and cause a HRM to overestimate Calorie burns. I was taught in my degree to use METs instead of a HRM for Calorie estimates because most people consume caffeine or are on a medication that affects heart rate. We used this compendium to find the MET level of various exercise modalities. http://prevention.sph.sc.edu/tools/docs/documents_compendium.pdf
To figure Calories burned from METs, you multiply the MET level by your weight in kilograms and by 0.0175 to get Calories per minute. Then multiply by the number of minutes you did the activity to get your Calories for the activity.0 -
I'd give it a go, I don't have a HRM either, I just use the totals on the machines and the estimated totals on here. I eat back my exercise calories and I am losing weight. You really won't know unless you try it. I was scared as well, I was pushing 245-250 when I started and I've dropped 20 pounds. Try it and see, if it works you'll be glad you did, if it doesn't its a very minor setback.
A 12.5 minute mile is nowhere NEAR a crawl. I was in the AF and being fit I was only ever able to break an 11:30 so don't knock youself!!! That's pretty damn good!0 -
Without a HRM it can be hard, and sometimes it's hard to afford a quality HRM. I found a few websites that give a fairly conservative estimate based on info you input, for walking this one works
http://caloriesburnedwalkinghq.com/
When I'm using the machines at the gym, I usually go with their estimates since I'm imputing all my vitals (age, weight, etc) and some of them have HRM in the bars (guess it makes for better accuracy).
I eat back some of my exercise calories, enough so that I feel full. I know it's a big deal on here, but you should do what works for you. If you're hungry then eat some of them, if not then I wouldn't worry about it.0 -
My question is are you moving closer to your goals. As long as you're making progress it doesn't matter.
It's really only critical to eat back ALL your exercise calories if you are way under eating. This is such a touchy subject and it's different for everyone.
For Example. Someone that has a goal of 1200 and are at a 2 lb per week deficit and burn 500 calories a day should eat back their calories because they are all ready at a 1000 calories a day deficit and are only netting 700 calories which is not enough for nutrition / energy.
But someone that's eating at a surplus and burn 500 doesn't really need to eat back any / all their calories.
A few weeks ago while I was in a bulk phase I was eating 2500-2800 but not eating all my exercise calories back.
So you see, the answer is it's different for everyone.
Edit*** Almost forgot. So play with your calories making small weekly adjustments and see if you move closer or further from your goals.0 -
I assume MFP overestimates by 30% and eat back around half. I am losing about 1-1.5 pounds a week.0
-
There is literally no correct answer here. Your problem is that you don't know how many calories you burned as it compares to the (usually unreliable) machine. None of us know, either. If it's reporting high, the people who say not to eat back calories are right. if it's reporting low, you're messing up your metabolism by not eating back. If you don't want to save up for a HRM, just flip a coin. It will be just as reliable as any advice you get within this thread.0
-
I will tell you what I did if it helps?
When I started in January I ate 1200 calories and worked out 5 days a week. I didn't eat back my exercise calories and lost 2lbs every week for 3 weeks. The probelm? I was SO tired, and grumpy and hardly had any energy. Plus I stopped losing
So i went on the forums looking for answers and found out that I was doing it all wrong. I started to eat some of them back and even cut my goal to .5 lbs per week. Why? Because I don't want to diet anymore. I don't want to worry about gaining weight and not fitting in my clothes. I also didn't want to worry about not being about to go out with my friends and eat normally.
I decided then that it was going to come off and I didn't care how long it took.
What happened? I kept losing. Slowly but it is happening.
This wee I decided that I didn't want to "chase" my exercise calories any more. I end up with a ton at the end of the day alot and have a hard time eating them all because I have a hard time with my lifestyle knowing when I can make it to the gym.
I took the advice of alot of people that have had success on here and went to this site:http://www.fat2fitradio.com/
and I figured out my calories for how often I work out.
Wanna know how much I am eating now including exercise? 1700 calories and I don't track my exercise anymore and I am 4'11" and 139lbs and work out 5 days a week. I lost a pond last week doing this.
You can do it hun.
and remember, you would have to up your calories by 500 above your maintenance to gain a pound of fat. you cant do that by eating you BMR.0 -
I couldnt afford a HRM either. I really wanted one as I was trying to eat back my calories but didnt want to go over.
I saved up and bought one for $70.00 I found out MFP is over about 30 calories for each exercise, so it wasnt to bad.
I am hoping to not be so stuck now that I know what I am burning.
My problem with eating back calories is I lost lots of weight NOT eating them back. So far I can barley maintain while eating them back.0 -
I have my activity level set to sedentary and my goal set to maintenance, and I don't log my exercise.0
-
I don't stress over getting the exact number of calories. I simply go by the estimate here on MFP and have had good success. If you are worried, try upping your calories by a little for a couple of weeks, then upping a little more.
For me, eating back my exercise calories has allowed me to work out much harder when I want to splurge -- a good thing I think. But I live for the little motivational tools MFP offers "77tes completed her diary and was under her calorie goal" and "If every day was like today, in 5 weeks ..."
Good luck.0 -
I don't have an HRM, but I use the Endomondo app on my LG phone. It tracks my walks, and since I'm moving faster I'm now burning more calories. I always use a smaller number than Endomondo gives me, and don't eat back all of my exercise calories - but maybe half of them.0
-
Thanks everyone for their advice.
Firstly - I hadn't looked on Amazon, and I have found a cheap HRM, which I will buy. Thank you for pointing me towards that
Secondly - I'm going to aim for my TDEE, which is about 1770 (I will use that website to work it out properly - right now I don't have a tape measure to fill in the details, so I'll have to borrow my neighbour's tomorrow!)
Thirdly - to answer the question "am I moving nearer to my goals" - I am, slowly. My goal isn't just about losing weight any more, it's about getting healthy, and a part of that is getting a healthy attitude towards food. I've been on a very heavily restricted diet of a long time (I posted about my experience here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/521480-1000-calories-or-less-a-day). In the past month, I've increased my food intake from under 1000 to 1450 (actually, today was 1600). That was really tough, and I lost weight today for the first time in ten days (I realise that's not a long time, however it was hard to increase and come out of my comfort zone, not lose weight, and sticking to my plan of increasing by 100 a week even when I hadn't lose a single ounce). So yes, I am nearer to my goals0 -
I got an HRM, but honestly, as far as I understand, if you have your activity level set properly for your TDEE, you shouldn't need to eat back your calories.
Multipliers for your BMR to get to your TDEE:
1.2 for Sedentary - desk job and little to no exercise
1.375 for Lightly Active - light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk
1.55 for Moderately Active - moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk
1.725 for Very Active - hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk
1.9 for Extremely Active - hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or training
So for example, if your BMR is 1300 and you work out a couple times a week, you should eat 1,788 a day and not log/eat back exercise.
If you use this method you should not need to eat back your calories unless you do activities above and beyond your multiplier activity.
OR, you can be conservative and just eat back like 25% or 50% of your "burned calories" along with your BMR.
Setting your activity level should be according to your daily activity BEFORE exercise. For example I have a desk job so my activity level is sedentary. My husband does landscaping so he would likely choose moderate to very active. Then, any exercise we do over and above our daily activity is what you log and eat the calories back for.
The reason it doesn't work to set your daily activity level for ALL activity and exercise is it's too broad of a setting. Say you set it to moderately active....what exactly is moderately active? Some days I walk and burn 250 calories, other days I ride my bike and burn 400. I can even ride the exact same route and burn a significantly different amount of calories depending on my energy level, how much wind resistance I'm working against, etc.
There would be too much room for error and over or under eating. To the OP, I didn't have an HRM for the first eight months when I first started here and I successfully lost 20 pounds. I would just use what MFP said I burned but maybe not eat them all back, maybe just about 80%. Also, HRMs aren't that expensive, I have a nice Polar one for about $80. Keep your eye on sales and you might be able to snag one for a better sale price.0 -
Thanks everyone for their advice.
Firstly - I hadn't looked on Amazon, and I have found a cheap HRM, which I will buy. Thank you for pointing me towards that
Secondly - I'm going to aim for my TDEE, which is about 1770 (I will use that website to work it out properly - right now I don't have a tape measure to fill in the details, so I'll have to borrow my neighbour's tomorrow!)
Thirdly - to answer the question "am I moving nearer to my goals" - I am, slowly. My goal isn't just about losing weight any more, it's about getting healthy, and a part of that is getting a healthy attitude towards food. I've been on a very heavily restricted diet of a long time (I posted about my experience here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/521480-1000-calories-or-less-a-day). In the past month, I've increased my food intake from under 1000 to 1450 (actually, today was 1600). That was really tough, and I lost weight today for the first time in ten days (I realise that's not a long time, however it was hard to increase and come out of my comfort zone, not lose weight, and sticking to my plan of increasing by 100 a week even when I hadn't lose a single ounce). So yes, I am nearer to my goals
Be careful, not all of them actually show calories burned! Which one are you looking at?0 -
I eat back all my exercise calories and use the numbers that the machines give me. If I go running or mountain biking I use calculators found online to estimate calories.
For running and mountain biking I usually drop the estimate by 25% or so just to be safe. And yes I know the machine numbers tend to be high estimates as well. But they are lower than MFP numbers so I go with those.
The most important thing though... is that I took 1 month to see how my plan would work before I decided to NOT buy a heart rate monitor.
My plan worked. I have lost about a pound a week ( a little less if sometimes) . So I stuck with it. If my plan stops working before I reach my goal I will make a change.
Lots of estimating but its working. You just need to take the time to see how your body reacts to what your doing.0 -
What do you do? Set up your calorie goals according to your TDEE and accounting for your activity level - that's exactly what I'm doing.
Hit up the website here;
http://www.fat2fitradio.com/tools/
Use the Military Bodyfat Calculator and then the Calories and Basal Metabolic Rate calculator to find your ideal calorie plan.
That's what I'd suggest. Either calculate your TDEE from another site, or just change your activity level to active or very active on here to include exercise, and don't log the exercise calories.
I never used a HRM and even they're not 100% accurate. The only thing way you're really going to know if you're eating the right amount is by your results... when you feel great, have tons of energy, are able to meet your fitness goals, and are losing the weight you want to lose.
And for someone just starting, running a mile in about 12:30 is great!0 -
I've just started running (I'm dreadful at it, but someone on here talked about how she ran a ten minute mile and she inspired me - I run / crawl a 12.5 min mile (don't laugh!) and according to MapMyRun (which calculates by speed and distance measured by Google Maps) I'll burn about 150 calories for 24 mins. Then, my cross-trainer - it says I burn 300 for 60 mins, and the estimate says 701 cals, so I've been averaging the two to get about 490/500 or so.
But really, what does this mean? When I "run" (a good part is walked!), am I *really* burning 150? And the cross-trainer - a good work out for me is 20km in 60 mins, which leaves me warm and slightly sweaty - not exhausted, red hot, and dripping in sweat - is that really 490 calories?
Generally, (by runner's truth) jogging or walking fast you're burning an average of 100 calories per mile. According to Runner's World, you burn 50% more calories running than walking the same distance, which makes sense. Running fast is harder than walking slow. Once you get to 5mph (12 minute mile), walking is harder and you'll burn more calories walking 5mph than jogging 5mph. This article is old but explains it pretty well. http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-242-304-311-8402-0,00.html
I can't help you with a target calories per day. I asked my doctor, who referred me to a nutritionalist, but I think a very experienced trainer could help you with that as well. Good luck!0 -
bump0
-
I got an HRM, but honestly, as far as I understand, if you have your activity level set properly for your TDEE, you shouldn't need to eat back your calories.
Multipliers for your BMR to get to your TDEE:
1.2 for Sedentary - desk job and little to no exercise
1.375 for Lightly Active - light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk
1.55 for Moderately Active - moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk
1.725 for Very Active - hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk
1.9 for Extremely Active - hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or training
So for example, if your BMR is 1300 and you work out a couple times a week, you should eat 1,788 a day and not log/eat back exercise.
If you use this method you should not need to eat back your calories unless you do activities above and beyond your multiplier activity.
OR, you can be conservative and just eat back like 25% or 50% of your "burned calories" along with your BMR.
I'm having problems with losing anything and I believe this is due to being 1800-2000 cals under each week. But using the above formula suggests I should be eating over 2,200 calories per day....I know I would gain weight doing this.
My BMR is 1429 and I exercise 5 times a week. My weight is still refusing to budge.0 -
I got an HRM, but honestly, as far as I understand, if you have your activity level set properly for your TDEE, you shouldn't need to eat back your calories.
Multipliers for your BMR to get to your TDEE:
1.2 for Sedentary - desk job and little to no exercise
1.375 for Lightly Active - light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk
1.55 for Moderately Active - moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk
1.725 for Very Active - hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk
1.9 for Extremely Active - hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or training
So for example, if your BMR is 1300 and you work out a couple times a week, you should eat 1,788 a day and not log/eat back exercise.
If you use this method you should not need to eat back your calories unless you do activities above and beyond your multiplier activity.
OR, you can be conservative and just eat back like 25% or 50% of your "burned calories" along with your BMR.
I'm having problems with losing anything and I believe this is due to being 1800-2000 cals under each week. But using the above formula suggests I should be eating over 2,200 calories per day....I know I would gain weight doing this.
My BMR is 1429 and I exercise 5 times a week. My weight is still refusing to budge.
Once you have multiplied your BMR by a multiplier according to your Activity, you should deduct between 10% and 20%, depending on how much weight you have to lose, to create the caloric deficit that will make you lose weight.
On your BMR, Moderately Active puts you at 2214. Subtracting 10% from that as you don't have much weight to lose lands you at 1992 calories a day to lose weight. That gives you a deficit of 222 a day, 1554 a week, or 0.4 pounds a week. (Little over 34 weeks to goal)
Subtracting 15% from that as you don't have much weight to lose lands you at 1881 calories a day to lose weight. That gives you a deficit of 333 a day, 2331 a week, or 0.6 pounds a week. (Little over 22 weeks to goal)
Subtracting 20% from that, which is not the best option for lean mass preservation as you don't have much weight to lose lands you at 1771 calories a day to lose weight. That gives you a deficit of 443 a day, 3101 a week, or 0.75 pounds a week. (Little over 17 weeks to goal)
Use these numbers or don't - up to you0 -
I have had HRMs in the past, but honestly I've found they're not worth the hassle. The time I spend putting it on and setting it up is time I could be spending working out!
Even HRMs just give an estimate based on your level of effort, you can't truly calculate burn outside of the laboratory (you've seen those people running of treadmills wearing what looks like oxygen masks, right?).
The burn for walking and running is pretty consistent for a given weight and speed. You can get your speed and a very good burn estimate using a phone app like Runkeeper or Cardiotrainer which take these plus sex, height and age into account.
Gym machines, not so. Very few even ask your weight, let alone any of those other factors. I'd record 60% of what they give you to be on the safe side, or 80% if it at least asks your weight.
Bear in mind that whatever you burn while working out includes what you'd be burning if you were just sitting on the sofa, so if you really want to be fussy, take away about 10% to be on the safe side.
Personally, the exercise itself is more important that the weight loss, so I'll record the full estimated burn and eat all the calories to fuel my next workout fully.0 -
I am in the same position as the OP. I may get a HRM, but my list of "things I want" is a long one.
You don't need a HRM to measure your heart rate. What I do is check my HR several times during my workout. I pay attention to what I'm doing at that point, and I attempt to estimate how much of my workout is at a given level of intensity. Then, I plug that information into an online HR-based calorie calculator.
It's a bit of work, and I'm still not sure that I'm getting perfectly accurate results, but I feel it's pretty decent.
For example, this morning, I climbed the hill by my house. I use a GPS phone app that tracks my speed and distance, running in the background.
I also have a stop-watch app on my phone which I've got preset to 10 seconds. I pause and take my HR a few times on my walk. I do it when I reach the farm gate at the top of the lane. I take it when I've reached another gate after doing a moderate climb. Then, I take it while doing the steepest climb (which I cannot do without pausing for breath several times. It's very steep and I sometimes have to use my hands.) I check it at the top. I check it at the same landmarks on the way back down. Meanwhile, I check my GPS tracker to see how fast I've been going. This gives me an idea of how long I spend moderately climbing, steep climbing, level walking, downhill, etc. I walk that lane and back to my front porch as briskly as I can and take my HR at the very end of it all. It's all a bit of a jumble of numbers, but I find that I can remember most of them pretty well. It helps that I've done the same hill/route four times this week. :laugh:
This enables me to get a fair idea of my average HR. I also break it down by time. I know I was climbing intensely, with a heart rate of at least 150, for about ten minutes. I know I was at a more moderate level of intensity for 30 minutes. I plug all that in, adding it up. (The gps app also records how long I am moving out of my total time, so even pausing is accounted for. )
I average out my various heart rates and plug that in for the total moving time, as well.
I compare it to calculators for "hiking across open country carrying less than 10lbs" for the length of time I was moving.
I go with the lowest total and put that on my exercise diary.
I'm doing that C25K thing so I know what you mean about the "running." I do the math. I add up the running intervals and the walking intervals and look up the calorie rates for the two different activities. I also check my heart rate at various points and try to estimate it on the calculator for comparison's sake.
I have to say that for those activities, I have not found the estimates on here particularly high. It may just be my body and weight that it works for. I don't know.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions