17 Day Diet

My motto is slow and steady wins the race... The slower I lose weight the easier it is for me to keep it off and not allow it to creep back up. Everyone is different though... It's all about finding what works for you. :flowerforyou:

It didn't take overnight to put the weight on, and it won't take overnight to lose it. I'll always stick by the tried and true method of eating healthy and at least 30 mins of exercise daily. I've lost 23kgs so far just by doing that alone. No fad diets, no pills, no under-eating.

Read a summary of the diet on webmd. Says the initial weight loss is just water and will come back once you get out of the first cycle. The author seems to think this detoxs the body or something?

Meh.

Eat less, exercise more, make better food choices. Only diet you'll ever need.

The research says taking it off quickly is better (http://www.rd.com/slideshows/13-things-experts-won’t-tell-you-about-weight-loss/#slideshow=slide4). If you've kept the weight on longer though it will be harder to take it off. Your body seems to get used to being at a set weight and it can be hard to get it to change. I seem to have set points where I stall for a few weeks and then start to lose again. I was stuck at 136 for over a month before I decided that simply watching calories and exercising wasn't enough. I'm hoping this will get me down to my next set point (127). From there I'll just stay with a modified version of the diet and do the final 12 pounds with that and increased exercise.
On Sunday I will start phase 3 of the 17 day diet. It's not a fad diet. It's teaching me different habits. I'm eating more lean protein, whole grain, fruits and vegetables than I ever did before. I'm eating about half the carbs I used to and they are better carbs. I thought I was eating well before but I realize I depended way too much on flour and sugar. I feel better now. My cravings have changed too. Now I want peanut butter on multigrain toast (still forbidden until Sunday). Much better than a donut.
It's not easy. You can eat all the protein and (non-starchy) vegetables you want but I promise all you'll want is a donut (or cookies, or bread) for the first few days. If you get past that initial withdrawal, you'll do fine.

While the 17 Day Diet is pretty legit, I don't find it maintainable. I like eating healthy out of EVERY food group and just take it day by day. It might be a good start, but you will stop losing the weight and then get upset that you are at a standstill. Why not incorporate each of the cycles and just stick with the guidelines? I wouldn't do each one separately.

Also, I personally tried the 17 Day Diet and I was hungry way more than I should be.

One of my coworkers did the diet and has lost 75 lbs and has kept it off in a year she has kept it off, she does the maintenance cycle through the week and eats whatever she wants on the weekends. She completed two whole rounds by the time she got to goal. I got the book and attempted it a few times and could not keep to it because I like to eat what I want in moderation. I think the book and by that I mean author has very good points and really focuses on eating a clean less processed diet. I think with any diet your going to always have a chance to gain weight back if you slip into old habits all the time, so whatever you decide good luck!

I made it through phase one and half of phase two before I started cheating. I had lost 17 pounds. After I hit a plateau, I got discouraged and without the support of my family to continue, I gave up. I wish I could get back on that wagon past day one, but it's a hard diet to follow. I liked it because it was extremely motivating due to the fast results. I hated it because my whole life revolved around food. I never did anything without thinking of what my next meal would be. There has to be a happy medium...

Hi. I've been reading through some of the posts and pretty much everyone (of the posts I read) is mentioning that losing weight slowly is the best way.
But I've just started reading the 17 Day Diet book and in there it says losing quickly (in a correct way) is also actually good.
What do you think? Is this true? I would like to lose about 8-10kg, so not alot, but its been there for years and really really needs to go now.
Thanks.

If you read on, the book also says that the fast weight loss at the beginning is water weight, which makes sense, because in Cycle 1 you won't eat any refined carbs or starches. Refined carbs will make you retain water; cut them out, and you'll lose very quickly indeed, but like I said, it's water. One of the major benefits of C1 (at least to my mind) is the fact that it will stop carb cravings completely.

The 17 Day Diet is excellent, very balanced, very sustainable, and a genuine life style change. The real fat loss will occur in Cycles 2 and 3, and in those cycles you'll be looking at 1 to 2 lbs per week, depending on how much you have to lose. You will never eat at a calorie deficit (it's recommended that you eat a minimum of 1200 kcal per day, with unlimited protein and veg), and if you do that you will not be hungry.

I've been on the 17 DD since January and have lost 15 lbs. Slowly and steadily.

In a nutshell the 17 Day Diet is another in a long line of high protein, low carb diets. People do experience rapid initial weight loss, most of it water.

Of course the author of the book will say it's healthy - he's trying to sell books. One of the most valuable lessons I learned from one my history profs was that everyone; even the most respected journalists, historians, health gurus etc; has an agenda and some level of bias and that the first question you have to answer for yourself when assessing the reliability of information is "what's the writer's agenda, who benefits?"

Over the years I've tried a great many "diets" only to have the weight come right back (and then some) when I resumed my old habits. Forget "diets", think lifestyle change - eat better, move more. It's a marathon not a sprint.