How accurate is the calorie burn?
maijageorge
Posts: 6
I was just wondering if anyone had a fancy heart rate moniter while they worked out to see how many calories you really burned vs what mfp says .. after my two workouts today, it said I burned 1617 calories.. Just wondering if these numbers were close to accurate.. Thanks!
0
Replies
-
Most folks here find the MFP numbers to be ridiculously high. Before I got my HRM, I took whatever number MFP gave me, then cut it by at least 25%.0
-
I'm afriad I have no idea what the answer is, but I use an HRM and I'm interested in knowing too!0
-
Mfp over estimates everything except running it seriously under estimates how much I burn. Hrm are not accurate in weight lifting calories just an FYI =]0
-
bump...I am thinking about getting and HRM and checking this out for myself.0
-
Everyone says that MFP numbers are biased high, but I do not find the MFP numbers to be that high. Do they vary a lot with weight? I am only 117 lbs so maybe there is more emphasis placed on weight in the MFP calculations?0
-
Once I got my HRM I found that it was off by 150-200 cals or so. Not sure if this helps a whole lot... if you are thinking of investing in a HRM, DO IT!!!
I thought LONG and hard about it before I did, but I LOVE mine. Got it on Amazon for $60... totally worth it!0 -
MFP is so generous with cals burned. I was really disappointed when I got my polar FT4 and it was so low compared to MFP. There was at least a 125-200 cal difference.., I recommend getting a HRM with a chest strap !!0
-
For me the MFP calories are insanely overestimated, it depends how fit you are and a bunch of other variables but I would strongly recommend a good HRM with a chest strap!0
-
I have found some to be very high - especially "circuit training general" under cardio. I find a good estimate to be a brisk run burns about 10 calories a minute and gauge my exercise off that. If MFP estimates calories higher than that for what I'm doing then I decrease it accordingly. best of luck.0
-
Which one did you get for $60?? All the Polar ones I was looking at were like $110.0
-
Once I got my HRM I found that it was off by 150-200 cals or so. Not sure if this helps a whole lot... if you are thinking of investing in a HRM, DO IT!!!
I thought LONG and hard about it before I did, but I LOVE mine. Got it on Amazon for $60... totally worth it!
Which one did you get for $60?? All the Polar ones I was looking at were like $110.0 -
From my experience MFP is both high and low on their calorie calculations, which should be expected as it's impossible to make it accurate for everyone. I definitely recommend getting a heart rate monitor. I can only speak to a few of the cardio categories. I have found that the MFP elliptical and stairmaster calculations a bit high depending on how hard I work. I have found that the MFP strength training calculation is insanely low (MFP is around 250 cal / hour and I'm burning closer to 600 cal / hour). Hope that input helps.0
-
this explains why i'm not losing weight then! (aside from all the food)0
-
HRMs and MFP have never been accurate for me. Plus, they don't tell you what your EPOC is.0
-
I think it does vary with weight, example I weigh 278 so I have to work harder moving my extra weight in that hour of cardio than say your 117 frame..Its like me adding a 161 pound weight , so it makes since I would burn more calories..I just don't know if 50 minutes of turbo jam like classes are burning 1050 calories a class for me..0
-
I totally agree with everyone here. The estimates on MFP are way higher than on my FT4. I too was dissapointed to see that I was burning much fewer calories but at least I have an accurate burn now. I love my FT4!0
-
I don't have a HRM, anxiously awaiting buying one....but my friend does have one and she says her HRM is usually about 30-50 cals less than MFP on an hour walk at 4.0...so take what you will...Hers doesn't have a chest strap the one I am getting will, so I'll update you on that comparison later...lol....I always an in the green for calories so if it is high like everyone says I compensate that way?...Everyone is different so I assume for some it's WAY off and for others it's closer....0
-
I have found some to be very high - especially "circuit training general" under cardio. I find a good estimate to be a brisk run burns about 10 calories a minute and gauge my exercise off that. If MFP estimates calories higher than that for what I'm doing then I decrease it accordingly. best of luck.
MFP gives me 324 calories for 50 minutes of circuit training which is less than 7 calories/minute. Like I posted earlier, I think MFP puts too much emphasis on weight.0 -
FT4 is 67.00 from the Polar website and it comes with the strap of course. Very much worth the investment!0
-
Once I got my HRM I found that it was off by 150-200 cals or so. Not sure if this helps a whole lot... if you are thinking of investing in a HRM, DO IT!!!
I thought LONG and hard about it before I did, but I LOVE mine. Got it on Amazon for $60... totally worth it!
Which one did you get for $60?? All the Polar ones I was looking at were like $110.
amazon has them =]0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.8K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 415 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.6K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions