Calories
Options

rachieepachiee
Posts: 38
Just read that if you eat 300 calories over your RDA each day of the week you can put up to a pound of weight on per week.. just thought I'd share..
0
Replies
-
Just read that if you eat 300 calories over your RDA each day of the week you can put up to a pound of weight on per week.. just thought I'd share..
What is your RDA?0 -
Just read that if you eat 300 calories over your RDA each day of the week you can put up to a pound of weight on per week.. just thought I'd share..0
-
Thats strange. I always thought it was 3500 a week, 500 a day. That is lower than I have heard. RDA=Recommended Daily Allowance.0
-
300 calories a day over.. so for women its 2000 so if we ate 2300 calories every day then we can put a pound on each week...unless the radio is lying haha!0
-
300 calories a day over.. so for women its 2000 so if we ate 2300 calories every day then we can put a pound on each week...unless the radio is lying haha!0
-
don't believe everything you hear/read in the media.
1lb = 3500 calories
300 x 7 = 2100 = not 1lb0 -
Oppsie..maybe I misheard them.. didn't even know you could measure a pound in terms of calories ha!0
-
when i average eating 2600 - 2800 (not net) i am losing and average of .67 a week
if i keep it more around 2000 - 2200 then 1.5 a week ..
and yes 1 pound is 3500 .. you would have to eat 3500 a week over YOUR maintenance calories to gain 1 pound0 -
Just read that if you eat 300 calories over your RDA each day of the week you can put up to a pound of weight on per week.. just thought I'd share..
Ya, someone there didn't know what they were talking about. Probably trying to report on some comment they didn't understand in the first place. Would be interesting to know what new "revelation" they thought they had there.
Besides which, what does the RDA have to do with an individuals own energy expenditure on daily basis?
And even the eating 500 extra daily to reach 3500 weekly or 1lb of fat - doesn't take into account there is not that kind of efficiency of conversion/storage of food eaten. Not all calories ingested are able to be broken down for use by the body, depending on the food type you don't get all those cal's out of it either, protein least efficient, to fat most efficient.
So you actually need to eat more than 500 extra to put on a lb a week of fat weight.0 -
maybe it's origin is in the Body Weight Simulator story...For example, the average overweight person needs to cut 100 calories from their current intake per day to lose 10 pounds over three years.
Half of the weight will be lost in one year and then you’ll reach a plateau, slowly losing the remainder by three years.
In contrast, for the same calorie reduction, the 3,500-calorie formula predicts you’ll lose 10 pounds in one year – and 30 pounds by three years.
1 lb = 454g * 9 cals/g = 4086 so presumably "3500" has some kind of efficiency factor or non-fat weight loss included ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.8K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 451 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.1K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions