good sugars?!?!
daisymullins
Posts: 37
right, i've noticed that my sugar count has been waaaayyy over what it should be, but it's all coming from 'good' sugars, (i.e fructose from fruit) and things like that.
I know all about like insulin and glycogen etc, and i was just wondering, what happens if i eat too much natural sugar from fruit? will that get turned into fat cells by the glycogen?
thank you! x
I know all about like insulin and glycogen etc, and i was just wondering, what happens if i eat too much natural sugar from fruit? will that get turned into fat cells by the glycogen?
thank you! x
0
Replies
-
Sure it will. Sugar = Sugar. It´s nothing else than Carbs. It´s just the chemical build-up what makes a tiny difference.0
-
the glucose, fructose and sucrose in fruits are the same as those in tank trucks or bags leaving factories, so they affect the body the same. Sure they come with a bit of fibre and the odd vitamin or two but fruit is largely juice and juice is a solution of sugars.
Fructose goes to the liver for processing, sucrose splits into glucose and fructose in the gut, glucose joins other carbs in the bloodstream.
The "good" is the result of a lot of marketing and propaganda, if you think it through you'll see past it. White sugar is grown in plants - cane and beet - and just made more convenient to use. It's still a natural sugar.0 -
so by eating lots of fruit, it's not necessarily good for you?0
-
sure it is, because of the vitamins and other stuff
but there are no "good" or "bad" sugar. surely its better to eat an apple than drink a bottle of coke. but the sugar is the same.
not just so much0 -
ahh sorry, by good and bad sugar, i mean the amount of weight you put on. In my mind, by eating a piece of cake you'd put on yadayadayada amount of weight, but if you ate a number of apples for instance, with the same amount of sugar in them... would you still put on the same amount of weight?
i know i probably make no sense hahaha, but thanks for all your help so far!0 -
so by eating lots of fruit, it's not necessarily good for you?
Yes, the calories in 100 calories of apple are the same as those in 100 calories of cake. A recent TV programme highlighted a lady eating 350 calorie fruit salads and not logging the calories because they were "healthy". We've been brainwashed.0 -
sure it is, because of the vitamins and other stuff
but there are no "good" or "bad" sugar. surely its better to eat an apple than drink a bottle of coke. but the sugar is the same.
not just so much
this makes me feel better about not stopping my soda habbit.0 -
so by eating lots of fruit, it's not necessarily good for you?
Yes, the calories in 100 calories of apple are the same as those in 100 calories of cake. A recent TV programme highlighted a lady eating 350 calorie fruit salads and not logging the calories because they were "healthy". We've been brainwashed.
o wow! did not know this thanks!0 -
hmmmm!!! well my sugar intake goal is set to 24, and it's currently on 90. The only 'bad' thing i've eaten today is a tiny TINY slither of lemon drizzle cake, and nearly all of the sugar has come from the grapes, apple, and banana i've eaten.. should i change this routine or not?0
-
Maybe you shoul open your diary so we can have a look. But if you should have 24 and you have 90.....hmmmm, maybe too much???0
-
hmmmm!!! well my sugar intake goal is set to 24, and it's currently on 90. The only 'bad' thing i've eaten today is a tiny TINY slither of lemon drizzle cake, and nearly all of the sugar has come from the grapes, apple, and banana i've eaten.. should i change this routine or not?0
-
hi guys, diary's open now (didnt realize it was private) I'm fine with eating the sugar as it's from fruit, im just worried about whether it'll be turned into fat cells by the glycogen. Thanks x0
-
hi guys, diary's open now (didnt realize it was private) I'm fine with eating the sugar as it's from fruit, im just worried about whether it'll be turned into fat cells by the glycogen. Thanks x
if the calories taken in exceed the calories used then yes the sugars will be converted and stored as fat0 -
are you gaining weight eating as you are? if not the only thing that would have any concern is if your body can handle the sugars or not ...are you predisposed to diabetes.... does it run in your family? if yes...i would watch your sugars.
Fruit is good for you...but like anything it needs to be balanced and in moferation like anything else.0 -
The way I see it you can overeat on anything - healthy and unhealthy.
I too have been shocked by my sugar content - my sugar comes from fruit, oar bars & some small packets of yogurt coated fruit.
So Ive been cutting down on my fruit - limit it to 2 portions a day. I have one in the morning in my prtein shake smoothie then either some strawberries or an apple with almond butter in the evening. Been doing this for a week so not sure what the effects will be as yet.
MFP has really opened my eyes to nutrition.0 -
hi guys, diary's open now (didnt realize it was private) I'm fine with eating the sugar as it's from fruit, im just worried about whether it'll be turned into fat cells by the glycogen. Thanks x
as long as you're not over on your calories, you should be fine. yes, you CAN gain weight eating fruit, but it's not likely. you'd have to eat almost 44 apples (over your maintenance calories) to gain a pound, but only about 7 pieces of chocolate cake, if that puts it in perspective.0 -
Keep the fruits and reduce the fat in your diet.
"Eating a diet of mostly fruit, including generous amounts of fresh sweet fruit, does not create high blood sugar not when you are eating a LOW-FAT diet, that is. When the system is not gummed up with excess fat, the sugar from even "high-glycemic" fruit moves easily in and then out of the blood. Blood-sugar levels in a healthy individual do not vary much in spite of changes in the diet." - Dr. Douglas Graham0 -
Keep the fruits and reduce the fat in your diet.
"Eating a diet of mostly fruit, including generous amounts of fresh sweet fruit, does not create high blood sugar not when you are eating a LOW-FAT diet, that is. When the system is not gummed up with excess fat, the sugar from even "high-glycemic" fruit moves easily in and then out of the blood. Blood-sugar levels in a healthy individual do not vary much in spite of changes in the diet." - Dr. Douglas Graham
This is mumbo jumbo. You fruits and carbs in general are a little high. Your fat intake is low. Both are important in moderation. If I were you, I'd lower my fruit intake by about 1/2 and slightly increase heathy fats from sources like nut butters, avocado, fish oil supplements, butter and coconut oil.0 -
thanks everyone for your help. I think i'll try loweing my carb intake, and eating more vegetable as opposed to fruit. Nuts are on the shopping list!0
-
You fruits and carbs in general are a little high. Your fat intake is low. Both are important in moderation. If I were you, I'd lower my fruit intake by about 1/2 and slightly increase heathy fats from sources like nut butters, avocado, fish oil supplements, butter and coconut oil.
Lower your PROCESSED REFINED carb intake, preferably to zero, but don't decrease your fruit intake, that's just silly.0 -
You fruits and carbs in general are a little high. Your fat intake is low. Both are important in moderation. If I were you, I'd lower my fruit intake by about 1/2 and slightly increase heathy fats from sources like nut butters, avocado, fish oil supplements, butter and coconut oil.
Lower your PROCESSED REFINED carb intake, preferably to zero, but don't decrease your fruit intake, that's just silly.
You got any peer reviewed studies to back this up? I totally agree on the processed carbs but the fats thing is whacky quite honestly. This person is not eating a high fat diet. They are eating a low fat high, high carb, high sugar diet which seems to be what you think is ideal. I think you are all wet.0 -
You fruits and carbs in general are a little high. Your fat intake is low. Both are important in moderation. If I were you, I'd lower my fruit intake by about 1/2 and slightly increase heathy fats from sources like nut butters, avocado, fish oil supplements, butter and coconut oil.
Lower your PROCESSED REFINED carb intake, preferably to zero, but don't decrease your fruit intake, that's just silly.
You got any peer reviewed studies to back this up? I totally agree on the processed carbs but the fats thing is whacky quite honestly. This person is not eating a high fat diet. They are eating a low fat high, high carb, high sugar diet which seems to be what you think is ideal. I think you are all wet.
Peer reviewed studies, i'm sure they exist, but i don't have any to list. I'm not a doctor or a scientist, i am a guy who lost a bunch of weight, very rapidly, by eating a plant based, low fat diet. The information i espouse is based on what has worked for me, and not worked for me, over many years, and based on what i have observed while traveling abroad, and based on what i have read in books.
We seem to agree about processed carbs, but we disagree on the fat issue. It seems you are saying she needs more fat, and i'm saying she doesn't, but what neither of us did was ask exactly how much of her total caloric intake came from fat.
Most people in the USA get too much fat, especially for those people who eat concentrated, processed fats like oils. Yes, fat is good, but not too much. From what i have read, and what i have experimented with in my own diet, anything more than 10% of your calories from fat is too much.0 -
By stopping your soda habit you would first off lose 10 lbs, drink more water, make your dentist & teeth happy.
And if you're drinking diet soda, well back to the retaining water problem due to all of the sodium. (ankles)
And caffeine will dehydrate your organs.0 -
one question... what are processed carbs!
I'm from the UK by the way.
When you say 10% calories from fats, is that total fats, or just saturated? I haven't got as much to lose as probably quite a few people on this site, and it's not for health reasons... just personal confidence. I started at 10.7st, and am down to 10.1st. My aim is to be 9.7st. Being very slightly anaemic, my diet can't be poor, and i'm just finding it hard to grasp how much fat/carbs to eliminate!0 -
From what i have read, and what i have experimented with in my own diet, anything more than 10% of your calories from fat is too much.
Stop talking about things you don't understand.0 -
You fruits and carbs in general are a little high. Your fat intake is low. Both are important in moderation. If I were you, I'd lower my fruit intake by about 1/2 and slightly increase heathy fats from sources like nut butters, avocado, fish oil supplements, butter and coconut oil.
Lower your PROCESSED REFINED carb intake, preferably to zero, but don't decrease your fruit intake, that's just silly.
You got any peer reviewed studies to back this up? I totally agree on the processed carbs but the fats thing is whacky quite honestly. This person is not eating a high fat diet. They are eating a low fat high, high carb, high sugar diet which seems to be what you think is ideal. I think you are all wet.
Peer reviewed studies, i'm sure they exist, but i don't have any to list. I'm not a doctor or a scientist, i am a guy who lost a bunch of weight, very rapidly, by eating a plant based, low fat diet. The information i espouse is based on what has worked for me, and not worked for me, over many years, and based on what i have observed while traveling abroad, and based on what i have read in books.
We seem to agree about processed carbs, but we disagree on the fat issue. It seems you are saying she needs more fat, and i'm saying she doesn't, but what neither of us did was ask exactly how much of her total caloric intake came from fat.
Most people in the USA get too much fat, especially for those people who eat concentrated, processed fats like oils. Yes, fat is good, but not too much. From what i have read, and what i have experimented with in my own diet, anything more than 10% of your calories from fat is too much.
So, in other words, you are recommeding from your own anecdotal evidence. BTW, I didn't have to ask how much of her intake came from fat. I looked it up on her dairy!
My guess is that the weight you lost was due to calorie deficit and not due to macro nutrient mix. Fats are essential to health in a reasonably dose. Just as a FYI, saturated fat in one of the key elements in human mother's breast milk. I wholeheartedly do not agree with your recommedations.0 -
Breast milk is made for a fast growing baby, their nutritional needs are different than an adult.
I'm new here, so i didn't know that you could look that up, forgive me. What was her percentage of calories from fat, BTW?
The weight i lost was from a variety of factors, and you are correct, one of them was indeed less calories. There were also other factors that are unrelated to fat consumption, too, like increased water consumption, removing all food chemicals from my diet, exercise, and other factors.
And again, i totally agree that fats are healthy in an appropriate dose, and i told you that i think an appropriate dose is less than 10% of your calories from fat. You haven't told me yet what you think an appropriate dose is.0 -
From what i have read, and what i have experimented with in my own diet, anything more than 10% of your calories from fat is too much.
Stop talking about things you don't understand.0 -
And again, i totally agree that fats are healthy in an appropriate dose, and i told you that i think an appropriate dose is less than 10% of your calories from fat. You haven't told me yet what you think an appropriate dose is.
And how did you come to this arbitrary magical dose? Does the person's heaight/weight etc matter at all? Let's say you have 5 people of varying heights, weights and lbm etc, all are consuming 2,000 cals a day, more then 22g of fat for each of them steps into bad territory?0 -
And again, i totally agree that fats are healthy in an appropriate dose, and i told you that i think an appropriate dose is less than 10% of your calories from fat. You haven't told me yet what you think an appropriate dose is.
Physiologically speaking it's more accurate to base macronutrient intake in grams/lb and not as a percent of calorie intake. Secondarily, 10% of 2200 would be 220 calories which would be 24 grams. That's less than half of what I'd recommend for someone with my stats, just as an example.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions