What's better? Short and intense or longer and less intense
hellohoney86
Posts: 21
Curious. I am quite out of shape right now and have just started them ten minute trainer. I find the workouts quite challenging but am trying to do 2 a day.
I have been splitting them up - one in the morning and one at night, rather than 20 minutes back to back. I start the second time fresh and full of energy that way. Wondering if I might be better off to put the 20 minutes together and prolong the session even if I can't put as much into the last half.
I have been splitting them up - one in the morning and one at night, rather than 20 minutes back to back. I start the second time fresh and full of energy that way. Wondering if I might be better off to put the 20 minutes together and prolong the session even if I can't put as much into the last half.
0
Replies
-
I honestly think that you are doing the right thing for you now by splitting them up. Once you have the endurance, go ahead and do 2 back to back. Split them for a couple of weeks and then do two together. You don't want to hurt yourself by starting off too strong. Your body will tell you when you're ready! Good luck :-)0
-
Thanks ) I figured two bursts of real energy would be better, but I wonder for weight loss if prolonging the sessions might be more effective for fat burning. Two weeks was the plan to try to do two together!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions