Running Miles Per Week

I recently read that researchers found that running at least 28 miles per week will result in weight loss?

Any thoughts or opinions regarding this? Anyone want to share their running regimen with us and their successes?

Replies

  • stepgirl0705
    stepgirl0705 Posts: 20 Member
    Running is a great way to lose weight! I've always been told that you can lose 100 calories per mile, no matter how fast or slow you go (this is average of course) but it is a great cardio regardless!

    I do one long run per week and a few short runs during. I also do cycle, step, and body pump. I also recently started swimming for practices for my triathalon training.
  • htmlgirl
    htmlgirl Posts: 314 Member
    Running is a great way to lose weight! I've always been told that you can lose 100 calories per mile, no matter how fast or slow you go (this is average of course) but it is a great cardio regardless!

    I average about 100 calories per mile when I run, by the time I'm done I've burned 400-600 calories, plus whatever I burn with my walk afterwards.
  • montana_girl
    montana_girl Posts: 1,403 Member
    I only run 12 to 17 miles a week and I have had great success with losing weight.

    Of course, eating right, keeping my body fueled and trying to eat cleaner probably had a lot to do with that too... :wink:
  • kgprice11
    kgprice11 Posts: 749 Member
    Running is a great way to lose weight, however having an exact number like "28" miles per week to lose weight I fill is arbitrary to a set weight, height, and other measurements on a person, whereas eating properly while exercising will get you the most weight loss. That's how I feel
  • Sox90716
    Sox90716 Posts: 976 Member
    I average about 25 miles a week.
  • scribb
    scribb Posts: 3,659 Member
    I average 21 miles a week
  • lauleipop
    lauleipop Posts: 260 Member
    Well, mathematically speaking, if you run 28 miles per week, and burn about 100 calories per mile, you'll be burning approximately 2800 calories per week with running.

    Assuming you are eating at or below maintenance, yes, that may/should result in weight loss.
  • Elzecat
    Elzecat Posts: 2,916 Member
    I only run 12 to 17 miles a week and I have had great success with losing weight.

    Of course, eating right, keeping my body fueled and trying to eat cleaner probably had a lot to do with that too... :wink:

    ditto! I'm currently running about 20 a week but have not been mindful of my eating...so I have actually gained weight rather than lost it...I don't think there's a magic number one needs to run per week, and in my case, I can't over eat or eat tons of junk and run and lose weight--I have to eat smart as well as move smart! :)
  • katekrise
    katekrise Posts: 178 Member
    Yes and no...It's also an excuse to eat more. Since I started increasing my running to train for a marathon...I've actually gained weight. No, not just muscle. I have been eating more. My size small scrub pants are getting pretty snug.
  • RedHotRunner
    RedHotRunner Posts: 850 Member
    I run 28 miles a week and maybe lose 1/4 pound a week if i'm lucky. A lot of marathoners I know actually gain weight when training for a race.

    Takes a lot of fuel to run like that.
  • GaryRussell123456
    GaryRussell123456 Posts: 87 Member
    I'm up to 50 miles and not losing. Unfortunately it's not a license to eat. On the positive side I'm not gaining.
  • I don't think it's running a certain amount necessarily that will result in weight loss.
    If you run, eat a clean proper amount, and add some strength in there then yes, you should lose fat.
    I am running between 15-20 miles a week and I actually haven't lost weight.
    I'm training for a marathon so I eat like 2,000-2,300 calories a day, but I have lost inches.
  • Masterdo
    Masterdo Posts: 331 Member
    No amount of exercise will outburn a crappy diet.

    If you truly intend to run that many miles per week, I really think you should :

    - Get fitted for running shoes.
    - Start with controlling your nutrition and sleep. You will need plenty of fuel to do this consistently.
    - Start VERY easy. Try a program like C25K, or an adaptation and see how it goes.
    - When you try to ramp up mileage, do it by no more than ~10% per week, and step down a little every 3-4 weeks
    - And really rethink why exactly you are doing this...

    Running that much is not the easiest, nor the most efficient way to lose weight, but if what you want to do is endurance running, well this is great! Start easy, be very careful with nutrition and especially rest, and you'll do fine.
  • BaDaSsBrUnEtTe
    BaDaSsBrUnEtTe Posts: 518 Member
    I average about 15 miles per week. And I have been losing weight just fine. Of course eating a balanced diet of mostly healthy foods is a big part of it too.
  • CarsonRuns
    CarsonRuns Posts: 3,039 Member
    Before I joined MFP, I was running 50 to 70 miles per week and wasn't losing the last 10 pounds that I wanted to lose. I joined, started logging my calories and eating what I was told while eating back my exercise calories and I lost 12 pounds in about 12 weeks. My mileage didn't change, what I put into my body did. Maintaining a caloric deficit is what did it, not the miles.
  • BrianSharpe
    BrianSharpe Posts: 9,248 Member
    I can't see where 28 miles per week would be any kind of magical number, you can lose weight walking, running, swimming, lifting weights, spinning etc etc etc (or not even exercising at all) as long as you are consistently eating at a caloric deficit. The rate of weight loss is dependent on the size of the deficit (eg avg 500 cal per day will, over time, avg 1 lb lost per week barring any metabolic disorders).

    Personally I aim for between 40 and 50km (25 to 430 miles) per week spread over 4 runs. I also row, lift weights and ride my bike; and am more interested in the beneficial effect exercise has on my overall health and well-being than just weight loss.
  • robpett2001
    robpett2001 Posts: 320 Member
    I can't see where 28 miles per week would be any kind of magical number, you can lose weight walking, running, swimming, lifting weights, spinning etc etc etc (or not even exercising at all) as long as you are consistently eating at a caloric deficit. The rate of weight loss is dependent on the size of the deficit (eg avg 500 cal per day will, over time, avg 1 lb lost per week barring any metabolic disorders).

    Personally I aim for between 40 and 50km (25 to 430 miles) per week spread over 4 runs. I also row, lift weights and ride my bike; and am more interested in the beneficial effect exercise has on my overall health and well-being than just weight loss.

    Yah, this is my approach too, except for the 40-50km a week part. I just hit a personal high with nearly nine miles in a week.

    That said, wow...28 miles a week...maybe someday...but right now, just the mere thought makes my legs turn to jelly.
  • Deedsie
    Deedsie Posts: 348 Member
    I'm training for a half marathon so I run 4x a week (1 cross train, 1 speed, 1 hills and 1 distance workout per week) and weight train 2x a week and cross-train 3x a week. I was netting at or just above my BMR and my times were suffering. I upped my calories and not only lost a lbs in 1 week but also shaved almost a minute of my mile average. That said, even with the running and eating more I'm still creating a deficit. I think that it is entirely possible to run and gain especially if you are a distance runner.
  • meerkat70
    meerkat70 Posts: 4,605 Member
    I'm running 2 x 6 mile, 2 x 4 and 1 x long run (12ish) at the moment. So about 32 miles.

    It takes a fair bit of effort to get yourself to a place where you're running that kind of distance, and a gradual build up is very important. It's also best to support running like this with some cross training and strength and flexibility training.

    I lose weight ok. My body comp has changed a lot. (yes, lifters, running can indeed help you shift your body composition.... I even have muscles and stuff.... )

    But I agree with Brian - there's no magic number. And to be entirely honest, I suspect I was losing more when I was running a little bit less.