calories too low on mfp

My BMR according to the Katch mcardle calculator is 1352.
So why is MFP calculating my daily calories at 1200?

I would like it to say 1352, and then if I exercise, I would not eat back the exercise calories unless I was at a deficit for the day.
(in which case I would never go below 1352.)

Currently, if I don't exercise, I'm stuck at 1200, and that is too low for me.
It is too low, right?

(female, 5'2'', 164 lbs, 35 yrs old)

Thanks.
«13

Replies

  • SPNLuver83
    SPNLuver83 Posts: 2,050 Member
    if your BMR is 1352 and you set your calories to that you should still eat back your calories, otherwise you will be worse off than you were netting 1200.
  • junipuni
    junipuni Posts: 264 Member
    They base it on your choices. Most people choose the lose two pounds options and since the lowest it will go is 1200 that's where it puts you. You can manually change/set your goals.
  • junipuni
    junipuni Posts: 264 Member
    if your BMR is 1352 and you set your calories to that you should still eat back your calories, otherwise you will be worse off than you were netting 1200.
    agreed.
  • DB_1106
    DB_1106 Posts: 154 Member
    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/

    Check this out. This may help you.

    Good luck!
  • MFP pal Anewlucia started the group EAT MORE TO WEIGH LESS ....I copied and pasted this information below from one of her threads that may helpful.

    You can get your bmr and tdee number from here :http://www.scoobyworkshop.com/calculators

    What is BMR? Your basal metabolic rate, or BMR, is the minimum calorific requirement needed to sustain life in a resting individual. It can be looked at as being the amount of energy (measured in calories) expended by the body to remain in bed all day!

    What is TDEE? TDEE is the common abbreviation for Total Daily Energy Expenditure which is a metric to calculate the amount of calories your body needs to function in a day. This is quite similar to BMR; in fact, you need your BMR to calculate your TDEE; but your TDEE accounts for your average daily activity as well to give a figure truer to your specific situation. Basically, the TDEE calculation relies on categorizing your daily activity into one of the metrics' predetermined groupings:

    Sedentary - desk job and little to no exercise Lightly Active - light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk Moderately Active - moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk (****SIDE NOTE - even if you have a desk job most people fit right here when you workout 3-5 days a week) Very Active - hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk Extremely Active - hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or training Once you have determined where you fit in on the TDEE activity rate scale, this activity rate is used to weight your BMR giving you a more accurate assessment of how many calories you really need throughout the course of the day.

    Here is a link to a site that you plug in your information and it will provide your BMR and TDEE along with your Cut value (again, if you workout 3-5 times a week select "Moderate" and the "Select Your Goal" option you will select is "Lose Fat - 15% caloric reduction.



    So now, you should have your BMR, TDEE, and Cut Value (TDEE - 15%)

    Here is a video that talks about this in great detail that hopefully will clear up any questions you may have: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYi9xjIRvbY&feature=g-all-u

    If TDEE is figured out correctly, then exercise cals don't *have* to be eaten back because, technically, TDEE figures them in. The underlying factor here, is that most people underestimate their activity levels, (for fear of being told to eat "too much") and then proceed to under eat. If a person is burning 1000 cals/day in exercise, then that should be figured into their TDEE, meaning their TDEE should be AT LEAST 1000 cals more than their BMR. If this is not the case then they are undercutting themselves on the cals. So a person w/a BMR of 1300, that puts up 1000 cal burns should have come up w/a TDEE calculation of 2400 or more. So any situation where a person is not getting those calculations, they should be eating back some of those exercise cals.

    So if you come up w/BMR=1300, TDEE=1800, you need to either A)eat back some cals, or B) recalculate your TDEE to include the *actual* burns that you're getting.

    So to cut using *true* TDEE figures, you'd just eat a flat TDEE (-15%), as long as TDEE is correct. It should be fine. But if you are using MFP's calculations, or are not getting a TDEE that includes the amount you burn each day *plus* BMR, you need to eat back some exercise cals.
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    1200 is not too low according to the authorities I've read, but if you prefer to eat at a higher level, you should do so. Some authorities would say don't aim for more than a 1000 calorie deficit per day on average. So 1200 could be "too low" for you if you regularly burn more than 2200.

    There is no authority who recommends not eating below your BMR.
  • kathyms13
    kathyms13 Posts: 497 Member
    i eat around 800 a day.
  • amivox
    amivox Posts: 441 Member
    Um, eating below BMR slows your metabolism, you need to NET at least your BMR otherwise you are doing yourself a huge dis-service.
  • amivox
    amivox Posts: 441 Member
    I generally eat over 2000 calories per day, even on rest days I try to keep my calories around at least 1900. I am losing weight just fine, and I am not slowing my metabolism down. I have lost 32 lbs since March 1st, so it IS possible to eat AND lose weight. Please consider looking into the Eat more to Weigh Less group. They have a lot of amazing and useful information and it is based on sound nutritional science. It doesn't promise to have you drop a whole lot of weight quickly, instead you learn how to eat properly to fuel your body and you lose slow and steady. It is more realistic and more sustainable than a crash diet.

    also, you can read the new rules of lifting for women, even if you decide you don't want to lift, that book explains REALLY well why you need to eat more than you have been told to by fad diet trends. Weight loss is a marathon, not a sprint. Enjoy the journey and eat well.
  • amivox
    amivox Posts: 441 Member
    1200 is not too low according to the authorities I've read, but if you prefer to eat at a higher level, you should do so. Some authorities would say don't aim for more than a 1000 calorie deficit per day on average. So 1200 could be "too low" for you if you regularly burn more than 2200.

    There is no authority who recommends not eating below your BMR.

    There are PLENTY of "authorities" that recommend NOT eating below BMR. The problem with the forums is that they are prime breeding ground for false information.
  • purple_power61
    purple_power61 Posts: 59 Member
    this is all so confusing
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    1200 is not too low according to the authorities I've read, but if you prefer to eat at a higher level, you should do so. Some authorities would say don't aim for more than a 1000 calorie deficit per day on average. So 1200 could be "too low" for you if you regularly burn more than 2200.

    There is no authority who recommends not eating below your BMR.

    There are PLENTY of "authorities" that recommend NOT eating below BMR. The problem with the forums is that they are prime breeding ground for false information.

    Please show me one. No one has yet. I've searched myself.
  • goldfinger88
    goldfinger88 Posts: 686 Member
    MFP is way too low and gives everyone the same 1200 calories. Or, so it seems to me. I suggest you go to fat2fitradio.com and use their calculator. Use the number that's right for you and do not eat back the calories. I've had good luck doing this. I would never try to live on 1200 calories or less a day. It's totally dangerous and you end out losing weight but it's muscle, not fat.
  • couldbeme
    couldbeme Posts: 55 Member
    well done u have have so well since march ive been on 3 wks now and ive lost 2 pounds, weigh in weds , my cals on this is 1380 , i have been keeping to this as much as i can i no to stay at aweight its ur weight in pounds times 14 lb times 13 that tells u what u need to stay at ur current weight x
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    Still looking. Here's another one that does not say 'don't eat below your BMR'-

    The American College of sports medicine (ACSM) says that the daily calorie level consumed for women should never drop below 1200 calories per day and 1800 calories per day for men.
  • kiwipez
    kiwipez Posts: 144
    how does age factor into all of this?


    Oh good grief! That calculator says I should be eating almost 1700 cal a day to lose weight! That just seems so wrong...


    ** it also says you have to recalculate your numbers as you go down in weight.
  • abbeyl11
    abbeyl11 Posts: 73
    I can't believe that I was eating 1200 calories before...this totally makes sense!! I can't find another BMR calculator out there that even comes CLOSE to what MFP suggests!!
  • andreamkelly
    andreamkelly Posts: 169
    If you want to try out a calorie/fat/protein/carb goal other than the default for MFP, go to goals, then change goals, then choose manual. You can fill out the amount of calories you would like and the percentage of the fat/carb/protein breakdown you would like. You can also change other goals like sodium.
  • AbbsyBabbsy
    AbbsyBabbsy Posts: 184 Member
    I would never try to live on 1200 calories or less a day. It's totally dangerous and you end out losing weight but it's muscle, not fat.

    Um, no. I did not lose 37 lbs of muscle. It's not dangerous at all. If you're young, active, tall, trying to lose only a few pounds, or male it might not be the right choice for you, but it's not totally dangerous in any way.

    Calorie goals can be changed. Start with the number you're comfortable with and tinker with it as you go. There's no one perfect number for weight loss. I increase and decrease mine all the time depending on hunger, stalls, ect. Good luck!
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    The American Diabetes Association says nothing about BMR, either-

    "Let’s get back to basics with how we eat and exercise. One truth remains in the battle of weight loss: you must eat and drink fewer calories than your body burns off.

    No matter what path you choose, make sure you use a safe weight loss plan that will support your ultimate health goals. Losing weight too quickly is not good for you. Aim to lose ½ to 2 pounds per week. This means you would need to cut out 250-1,000 calories from what you would normally eat in a day."

    http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/fitness/weight-loss/getting-started/
  • Tsfppb
    Tsfppb Posts: 3
    If your BMR is around 1400 (where mine is) and you are slightly active (workout 3 days a week and low cal burning job) a way to roughly estimate your daily caloric needs is to multiply your BMR by 1.2 this puts me at 1680 for my daily burn. So in order to lose 1lb per week I have to have a 500 cal deficit putting me around 1200 cals per day. I am 5'1" and 145 but muscular. On days I don't work out I eat right at 1200 cals but on days I work out I make sure to eat between 200 and 300 more. If you are only working out for 30 mins a day at most with a VERY intense workout you will burn around 400 to 500 cals depending on your size, health, and overall fitness level so if you do not eat bellow your BMR and only workout that much you WILL NOT lose weight at a speed of 2Lb a week unless you have a lot to lose. If you only have 20 lb to lose and a life beyond the gym there is no reason that eating slightly below your BMR will hurt your metabolism. A good rule of thumb is to not go over a 1000 cal deficit unless severely over weight. So watch your calories and your working out and eat back the calories that make you have a bigger deficit than that but not all of them if your goal weight is 30 or less pounds away.
  • kiwipez
    kiwipez Posts: 144
    this is all so confusing

    I agree!
  • Eadne
    Eadne Posts: 18 Member
    My BMR is around 1400 and MFP set my calories at 1200. I decided that was far too low and changed it to 1500... I'm still losing weight :)
  • Kppr59
    Kppr59 Posts: 12
    Where can I find the group, eat more to weigh less? I see it discussed all the time but don't know where it is.
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    The American Heart Association says nothing about BMR.

    "To lose weight, you must use up more calories than you take in. One pound equals 3,500 calories. To successfully and healthfully lose weight—and keep it off—most people need to subtract about 500 calories per day from their diet to lose about 1 pound per week."

    http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/GettingHealthy/WeightManagement/LosingWeight/Losing-Weight_UCM_307904_Article.jsp

    By the way, none of these sites say anything about 'eating back your exercise' either.
  • mcarter99
    mcarter99 Posts: 1,666 Member
    Nothing on BMR or 'eating back' from Mayo Clinic. There's a warning not to go under 400-800 calories, though. You'd think they'd use BMR if there was any evidence that eating under it was unwise.

    "If you lose weight by crash dieting or by drastically restricting yourself to 400 to 800 calories a day, you're more likely to regain weight quickly, often within six months after you stop dieting."

    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/weight-loss/AN01619
  • marie_cressman
    marie_cressman Posts: 980 Member
    If you feel it's too low, change it like others have posted. I personally eat 1,600 calories a day and was just told by my nutritionist to up my calories to about 1,800 a day because of the intensity of the workouts I'm doing. I honestly in all of the years of alorie tracking have never gone as low as 1,200 and I've lost over 100lbs. I haven't seen the eat more group either but I wouldn't mind visiting!!
  • ArmyRD
    ArmyRD Posts: 24
    "ur weight in pounds times 14 lb times 13 that tells u what u need to stay at ur current weight x "

    This calculation is not correct. When I tested it on my current weight, I got a total of 21,476 calories per day.

    As a dietitian, I have learned that people in general underestimate their total calorie intake from food by as much as 42%. They also overestimate their energy expenditure by more than 23%. So, if I say I am eating roughly 1500 calories a day (not using calculating tools), I am probably eating closer to 2130 calories. If I say I am burning about 475 calories a day on exercise, I am probably only burning about 366 calories. At the end of the day, I think I have a net calorie intake of 1025 calories. However, my ACTUAL net intake is about 1764 calories a day, a difference of 739 calories. An increase of 500 calories a day over your daily recommended needs can cause a 1# weight gain per week. So I can expect to see about 1-1.5# weight gain instead of the anticipated 1# weight loss in a week.

    Bottom line: use caution when calculating your energy expenditure; measure your food to ensure accuracy with documentation; stay within your recommended daily calorie needs. There is no need to think you are eating back your calories (or however it was stated). Just stay with a set calorie number based on your specific needs everyday regardless if you exercise that day or not. Don't forget to drink a minimum of 8 glasses of water. Water is very important for hydration and appetite control.
  • ArmyRD
    ArmyRD Posts: 24
    The AHA is correct about the 500 calories a day. But you have to know how many calories you are eating in the first place before you can subtract the 500 a day. That is why using a tool like MFP is so helpful. However, you have to be totally honest with yourself with the amount of food you are actually consuming for anything to work.

    There is no such thing as 'eating back your exercise' unless you are deliberately consuming extra calories on exercise days. Recommended daily calorie ranges are based on a stable daily intake, not highs and lows based on exercise days and non-exercise days.
  • ArmyRD
    ArmyRD Posts: 24
    Nothing on BMR or 'eating back' from Mayo Clinic. There's a warning not to go under 400-800 calories, though. You'd think they'd use BMR if there was any evidence that eating under it was unwise.

    "If you lose weight by crash dieting or by drastically restricting yourself to 400 to 800 calories a day, you're more likely to regain weight quickly, often within six months after you stop dieting."

    http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/weight-loss/AN01619

    Not only do you gain the weight back but what you lose in the first place is muscle and water, not fat. But what you gain back is typically more fat, not muscle. This is what happens with YO-YO dieting. The problem is that muscle is active tissue that burns calories - more muscle, more calories burned. Fat, however, is a storage form of tissue. It is active in the respect that all body tissue is alive and active, but not to equal extents. If you want to lose fat tissue, increase your strength training (we are not talking 'body building' here), add more intensity to your cardio, and stay within your recommended calorie needs everyday.