are macros important if within calorie limit

17746991

hi my macro for carbs is sometimes over by a bit yet my fat is waaaaaay under, however I have never passed my overall calories
does this matter?

yarwell

Could do, there are fats you need and fat soluble vitamins that are helpful too. If you had no protein you wouldn't last long, so it's not just about calories.

Haakonson

Generally it shouldn't matter too much if your calories are still on target... having said that, I find it best to try and keep the carbs down, unless it's vegetables; the human body doesn't actually need them, but if you want to have cheat snack that's carbs, eat it after a workout as your body will burn it off fast with the increased metabolism. Low fat diets aren't too useful either. This is just what I know from experience/research.

50sFit

Kate17746991 wrote: »

hi my macro for carbs is sometimes over by a bit yet my fat is waaaaaay under, however I have never passed my overall calories
does this matter?

For mere weight loss, it might not be a huge issue, but to achieve peak fitness and optimal health, macro's are very important along with other items to track like fiber and salt.
It depends on where you are in your journey and your overall goals.

Liftng4Lis

If you exercise a lot, protein is very important. Honestly when I first started, I just concentrated on staying under. As one progresses, they do become more important.

elphie754

Haakonson wrote: »

Generally it shouldn't matter too much if your calories are still on target... having said that, I find it best to try and keep the carbs down, unless it's vegetables; the human body doesn't actually need them, but if you want to have cheat snack that's carbs, eat it after a workout as your body will burn it off fast with the increased metabolism. Low fat diets aren't too useful either. This is just what I know from experience/research.

Really? The brain can only use glucose for energy (which is why those who have low blood sugar become altered mental status). Guess where glucose comes from? I would say carbohydrates I therefore needed.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

Haakonson

elphie754 wrote: »

Haakonson wrote: »

Generally it shouldn't matter too much if your calories are still on target... having said that, I find it best to try and keep the carbs down, unless it's vegetables; the human body doesn't actually need them, but if you want to have cheat snack that's carbs, eat it after a workout as your body will burn it off fast with the increased metabolism. Low fat diets aren't too useful either. This is just what I know from experience/research.

Really? The brain can only use glucose for energy (which is why those who have low blood sugar become altered mental status). Guess where glucose comes from? I would say carbohydrates I therefore needed.

You're body can compensate, as they're not essential, but I didn't say to just have none... this is what I meant: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/jim-stoppani-six-week-shortcut-to-shred-nutrition-overview.html

cbhubbybubble

Whether it matters depends on the individual and on their goals. As noted, for weight loss only, the main thing is calories, but even for some macros will matter for that. I'm insulin resistant, so carbs and sugar matter. For some, they don't. For health, all your macros matter. I wouldn't (and I don't) stress out hitting them perfectly, but it's best to make an effort to get close to balancing them out.

You can change the macro ratios you are give, too. The defaults don't fit everyone's needs. I lowered my carbs and upped my protein, for example.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

stupidloser

It does matter, your macro ratio affects your body composition. if u want a lean body composition, strive for a hi protein/mod carb ratio.

NoelFigart1

Kate17746991 wrote: »

hi my macro for carbs is sometimes over by a bit yet my fat is waaaaaay under, however I have never passed my overall calories
does this matter?

For simply losing weight, not really. For survival, not at all. (Humans can survive where a goat would starve)

But for optimum well-being? That's subjective. I feel best on a diet that's lower in carbohydrate and higher in protein and fat. For me, a bacon and eggs breakfast is just the thing.

I have a friend who would feel ill on that, and for her, the same amount of calories in oatmeal keeps her happy and energetic all morning. I'd have a blood sugar crash a couple of hours before lunch if I tried that.

lorib642

cbhubbybubble wrote: »

Whether it matters depends on the individual and on their goals. As noted, for weight loss only, the main thing is calories, but even for some macros will matter for that. I'm insulin resistant, so carbs and sugar matter. For some, they don't. For health, all your macros matter. I wouldn't (and I don't) stress out hitting them perfectly, but it's best to make an effort to get close to balancing them out.

You can change the macro ratios you are give, too. The defaults don't fit everyone's needs. I lowered my carbs and upped my protein, for example.

^^^^This

Personally, I just look at proteins and I am trying to increase fiber. It just depends on what you are aiming for, For me, it's okay if i don't hit them, just something to aim for.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

philwrightfitness

MrM27 wrote: »

stupidloser wrote: »

It does matter, your macro ratio affects your body composition. if u want a lean body composition, strive for a hi protein/mod carb ratio.

I actually like mine set where carbs are higher than protein.

This and.. If you're not keto adapted then you'll need at least 100g for your brain function, anything above that should be carefully managed depending on your goals and fitness regime. Carbs spike your insulin and are a double edged nutrient , timing, quantity and the structure of the rest of your diet are all important.....however an occasional day of drifting over your allowance won't hurt...getting adequate fats and protein are probably more important