Ate over calories - lost weight?

dakotababy

Just wondering, as this is always an awesome surprise. I have been losing weight slower as of the past few months. In fact, I have not lost any weight over the last 3 months and no changes in my measurements.

Yesterday I ate a LOT…probably about 2700. My goal is 2000 calories. I got on the scale and lost weight this morning.

Now, since I have been plateaued for the last few months, does this mean I should increase my calorie goal? or lower it?

5'7, 168lbs. Exercise 3-4 times per week. 50% weights/50% cardio (occasional Hiit). I have been at this for 2.5 years.

arditarose

That's hard to say. I don't think that your high calorie day and your loss on the scale are directly related. Was your deficit the week prior larger than normal?

dakotababy

well I am keeping a deficit of 250ish off of my tdee per day. Ultimately, my deficit over the week is between 200-300 calories.

My tdee is typically 2200-2300/day. I eat 2000 per day. I don't know, my goal was to get to 150lbs, and I am at 168lbs after started at 250lbs. It is like as soon as I hit 169 - all loss has stopped. This includes measurements.

arditarose

Have you recalculated your TDEE lately? I mean, that's a pretty small deficit still. Not much room for error at all.

segacs

You're basing it on a single day?

Weight fluctuates a lot during a weight loss. You won't instantly see yesterday's calories reflected in today's scale reading. CICO works over time as it averages out, but it's not that exact a science every time you step on the scale.

If you haven't lost anything in the past 3 months, that's pretty much a plateau. I'd say adjust your calories downward a bit to start losing again.

bokaba

...

TimothyFish

Fluctuations over one day have more to do with what is in your gut rather than fat you're storing. Sometimes, eating more than normal can trigger waste to exit the system more quickly than normal. It is a temporary condition and should not be taken as an indication that eating more will result in more weight loss.

ana3067

I've both lost and gained the day after eating at or above maintenance. as said above, it's not linear. If you know what your maintenance is, subtract 20% and set that as agoal, and if you have a hard time eating that because you are too hungry, increase it. Monitor your results, etc.

ILiftHeavyAcrylics

You should base your calorie goal decisions on your results over the course of weeks and months. One day isn't enough data.

There's been some speculation that eating above your normal intake level can cause you to shed some water weight. It's not fat, however.

stephe1987

I'm guessing that you lost water weight. Eating more on a regular basis will lead to weight gain, but going over every once in a while can be a good thing, like setting a "reset" button on your weight loss. A good idea might be to eat at a small deficit (~20%) for a few weeks and then take a week off and eat at maintenance. Some people's bodies adjust to eating a lower calorie amount and they get stuck, so increasing by a little for a short time can be a good thing.

Christine_72

I've lost count of how many times I've read people losing weight in the week they ate more than usual. There's got to be something to it???

Liftng4Lis

One day is irrelevant in the scheme of things. Normal, daily fluctuations.

TimothyFish

stephe1987 wrote: »

I'm guessing that you lost water weight. Eating more on a regular basis will lead to weight gain, but going over every once in a while can be a good thing, like setting a "reset" button on your weight loss. A good idea might be to eat at a small deficit (~20%) for a few weeks and then take a week off and eat at maintenance. Some people's bodies adjust to eating a lower calorie amount and they get stuck, so increasing by a little for a short time can be a good thing.

The only way a person will "get stuck" while eating less is if they have reduced their physical activity (perhaps, because they lack energy). Eating more will not reset a person to a higher activity level.

dwcezscd0c

Up your calories! Each time I hit a plateau I get so frustrated. Finally clued in the plateau is your bodies way of asking for a little bit more. Bump up calorie intake by 200. Honestly, you will start losing again!

neanderthin

dwcezscd0c wrote: »

Up your calories! Each time I hit a plateau I get so frustrated. Finally clued in the plateau is your bodies way of asking for a little bit more. Bump up calorie intake by 200. Honestly, you will start losing again!

Nope. Generally it's inaccuracy in logging foods or calories burned or both.

999tigger

Nope, but go ahead and increase your calories thats always the way to lose by creating a surplus.

Natural fluctuations.
Inaccurate logging of consumption and burning.
Its not linear.

How do you know its anything other than a fluctuation if you are basing it on one day?

Liftng4Lis

dwcezscd0c wrote: »

Up your calories! Each time I hit a plateau I get so frustrated. Finally clued in the plateau is your bodies way of asking for a little bit more. Bump up calorie intake by 200. Honestly, you will start losing again!

GaleHawkins

dwcezscd0c wrote: »

Up your calories! Each time I hit a plateau I get so frustrated. Finally clued in the plateau is your bodies way of asking for a little bit more. Bump up calorie intake by 200. Honestly, you will start losing again!

Correct.

As others here reported more calories have helped start losing again in my personal experience as well. The science supports it at well. When we fight against our hormones and brain controlling our body weight we do not win long term. Well we can starve ourselves to death but this is far from winning. The Eat More to Weight Less group exists for a reason.

All diets work to a point and all diets fail at a point. The human body is very evolved and self controlled for the most part.

obscuremusicreference

It's my theory that the people who up their calories lose because they start accurately logging again at their new calorie level. Logging can get tiresome, especially if you've been doing it for a while.

GaleHawkins

obscuremusicreference wrote: »

It's my theory that the people who up their calories lose because they start accurately logging again at their new calorie level. Logging can get tiresome, especially if you've been doing it for a while.

I expect that can be a factor too.

Eating at a deficit of more than 10% will at some point stop weigh loss per some research especially after one loses more than 10% of their body weight.

One paper I read suggested a max deficit of 10% then when 10% of starting weight is loss to stop losing and maintain for six months then go for the next 10% of remaining body weight to prevent the automated regain of weight lost that occurs. We know that 83% of us do this regain thing after a large non stop weight loss.

Based on that data a 50 pound weight loss over three years is better than a 50 pound weight loss over say 6 months.

neanderthin

GaleHawkins wrote: »

obscuremusicreference wrote: »

It's my theory that the people who up their calories lose because they start accurately logging again at their new calorie level. Logging can get tiresome, especially if you've been doing it for a while.

I expect that can be a factor too.

Eating at a deficit of more than 10% will at some point stop weigh loss per some research especially after one loses more than 10% of their body weight.

If it's not a new maintenance level, no we don't stop losing weight in a deficit......I'm waisting my breath on you, no doubt about it, but hopefully misinformation like this gets corrected by someone along the line.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

MagnumBurrito

This was a refeed your body needed. Do this every week or two while eating at a deficit the other days.

segacs

SO MUCH WRONG in this thread! *Head spinning*

Unknown

This content has been removed.

MagnumBurrito

MrM27 wrote: »

LeadingMuscle wrote: »

This was a refeed your body needed. Do this every week or two while eating at a deficit the other days.

Again, a refeed does not simply mean eating over your alloted limit. There is a proper way to do a refeed.

Yes, there is a proper way. This is still what she did.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

NoelFigart1

You cannot plot a curve from one point. ONE DAY of weight loss is not enough information to tell you anything.

MagnumBurrito

MrM27 wrote: »

LeadingMuscle wrote: »

MrM27 wrote: »

LeadingMuscle wrote: »

This was a refeed your body needed. Do this every week or two while eating at a deficit the other days.

Again, a refeed does not simply mean eating over your alloted limit. There is a proper way to do a refeed.

Yes, there is a proper way. This is still what she did.

How do you know it's a refeed as in very high carb, low fat and moderate protein? What benefit does someone that is not glycogen depleted, low Leptin and lean get from a properly structured refeed other than mental?

A day of overeating =/= refeed.

From the information she gave us, she suddenly loses weight after a 3 month plateau by overeating calories, deductive reasoning says she unintentionally did a refeed. Again, you don't have to be lean to need a refeed. http://suppversity.blogspot.com/2014/11/calorie-shifting-refeeding-for-max-fat.html

Unknown

This content has been removed.

FromHereOnOut

I had something similar happen recently, paired with being too hungry too often, and paired with not getting results, I just decided to eat more. I figured I was already working out enough to build muscle, so I might as well eat more and I'll either gain muscle, or I'll find the most calories I can eat while still maintaining and then eventually find the most calories I can eat while losing. From now on I want to lose on the maximum number of cals that I can, not on the least. Too often we keep searching for the bottom of the range for losing, instead of the top range for losing. I don't even know why we do it...impatience I guess, but the inevitable plateau that you get at the bottom range takes longer. Idk if that helps, but good luck!