Eating back exercise calories

Options
andysport1
andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
Do you need to eat back the calories ?
What happens if you don't ?
After exercise I take a protein shake and then an hour later have 100/200 calories of fish

I burn between 500 & 1000 calories in a session
«1

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?
  • shadow2soul
    shadow2soul Posts: 7,692 Member
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.

  • This content has been removed.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    That days burn was 3.5 miles walking 350 cals, 1 hour spinning class 720 cals & 1 hour bodypump at 560 cals
    Swimming is the biggest burn for me as I work so hard I'm usually sweating within 10 mins, I do swim sub 20 mins per mile which is extremely quick.

    billie if you run on a tread mill at a tiny incline at 10 minute miles you'll burn near on 600 an hour. Spinning is one of the highest class based burns.

    Any cardio undertaken as intervals (extreme) will burn 600 ish
    2 1/2 hours exercise will equate to your dream 1500
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    Struggling today
    1100 in 636 out
    Start the day off tomorrow with a 5k run
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member

    where do you get your calories burned numbers from?

    Most off here, the body pump & spinning from the guidance notes from the class provider using weight, intensity, HRM

    Running as a guide is generally 100 cals per mile irrespective of the speed

    From your question do you think otherwise ? If I'm getting it wrong I'd like to know.

  • BWBTrish
    BWBTrish Posts: 2,817 Member
    andysport1 wrote: »

    where do you get your calories burned numbers from?

    Most off here, the body pump & spinning from the guidance notes from the class provider using weight, intensity, HRM

    Running as a guide is generally 100 cals per mile irrespective of the speed

    From your question do you think otherwise ? If I'm getting it wrong I'd like to know.

    the numbers on here are wrong most of the time...they are too high of a burn...just sayin'.

    Than also explain to him why they are wrong.

  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    Any suggestions of where to look for more accurate figures ? please.
  • SuggaD
    SuggaD Posts: 1,369 Member
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    edited January 2015
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Am I reading this right? You're aiming for NEGATIVE calories per day????

    1000 in, 1400 lost from exercise...what 1600+ lost from being...alive...for a negative 2000?
  • BWBTrish
    BWBTrish Posts: 2,817 Member
    edited January 2015
    Most people here say the given numbers are to high
    I believe that too.

    What i did to start with was log those to high calories. So say 600 for an given excercise.
    From those i took 50% off ( too high) so 300 left and from those left 300 i could ( but mostly even didnt) eat back 150.

    And i did fine with that, well great even :)

    About a month ago i bought an polar watch FT7 ( 72 dollar on amazon)
    More accurate But this is also always an estimate. After some research, most sites come out for HMR an overestimate of 20%.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    I have a £300 garmin with HRM sometime ago I used it while doing a extremely intensive swim club training session (lady next to me was an Olympic athlete) we covered approx. 4 miles of intervals in the 2 hour session it counted my burn as 4000 calories Hmmm !
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,321 Member
    edited January 2015
    SuggaD wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.


    More than YOU can eat back....lol. I have no problem :)

  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    edited January 2015
    andysport1 wrote: »

    where do you get your calories burned numbers from?

    Most off here, the body pump & spinning from the guidance notes from the class provider using weight, intensity, HRM

    Running as a guide is generally 100 cals per mile irrespective of the speed

    From your question do you think otherwise ? If I'm getting it wrong I'd like to know.

    the numbers on here are wrong most of the time...they are too high of a burn...just sayin'.

    Than also explain to him why they are wrong.

    um...I did...I said they are too high for what it should be. I would think it would be best to get a HRM for a little more accurate "count".
    So you are guessing then?

    Not getting at you but there is a dreadful "group think" on here that gets repeated over and over but often just based on hearsay.
    Sure some estimates sound fanciful but some are also based on well known and tested metrics.
  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,149 Member
    MFP is notorious for overestimating burns, thus most people only eat back half.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,321 Member
    I've never had an exercise from the database be even remotely accurate...just sayin'.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »

    where do you get your calories burned numbers from?

    Most off here, the body pump & spinning from the guidance notes from the class provider using weight, intensity, HRM

    Running as a guide is generally 100 cals per mile irrespective of the speed

    From your question do you think otherwise ? If I'm getting it wrong I'd like to know.

    the numbers on here are wrong most of the time...they are too high of a burn...just sayin'.

    Than also explain to him why they are wrong.

    um...I did...I said they are too high for what it should be. I would think it would be best to get a HRM for a little more accurate "count".
    So you are guessing then?

    Not getting at you but there is a dreadful "group think" on here that gets repeated over and over but often just based on hearsay.
    Sure some estimates sound fanciful but some are also based on well known and tested metrics.

    most sound fanciful...lol. I'll keep cutting MFP's numbers by AT LEAST a third when I log them. I'd rather not count on those #'s if I'm not burning that much.

    Missed my point a bit - you don't actually know what the true number is.

    In the end consistency beats accuracy anyway, if you are hitting your weight goal over time then your food logging and exercise logging is good enough.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    Has anyone got more accurate burns for
    Running 10,9 & 8 min miles
    Walking at 2mph & 3mph (I do this at work whilst doing other things)
    Spinning class
    Bodypump
    I go hard in the classes
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    SuggaD wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.

    Challenge accepted.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    Which challenge doing the ride or eating the burn ?
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,321 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    SuggaD wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.

    Challenge accepted.

    It's not as glorious as it sounds. 100 miles you will burn about 3500 calories or so and takes between 5-7 hours depending on the person. Most cyclists consume about 500-700 calories per hour while cycling for energy.... I actually consume more than I burn during a ride.... :(

  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    edited January 2015
    Hornsby wrote: »
    RGv2 wrote: »
    SuggaD wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.

    Challenge accepted.

    It's not as glorious as it sounds. 100 miles you will burn about 3500 calories or so and takes between 5-7 hours depending on the person. Most cyclists consume about 500-700 calories per hour while cycling for energy.... I actually consume more than I burn during a ride.... :(

    I was more accepting taking on the rider's burn in one sitting. More fun that way. I wasn't actually going to do the ride.... I ran 2 marathons, that's plenty for me.
  • andysport1
    andysport1 Posts: 592 Member
    [/quote]

    It's not as glorious as it sounds. 100 miles you will burn about 3500 calories or so and takes between 5-7 hours depending on the person. Most cyclists consume about 500-700 calories per hour while cycling for energy.... I actually consume more than I burn during a ride.... :(

    [/quote]

    You can eat 3500 calories whilst riding a bike ? Wow
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,321 Member
    andysport1 wrote: »

    It's not as glorious as it sounds. 100 miles you will burn about 3500 calories or so and takes between 5-7 hours depending on the person. Most cyclists consume about 500-700 calories per hour while cycling for energy.... I actually consume more than I burn during a ride.... :(

    [/quote]

    You can eat 3500 calories whilst riding a bike ? Wow[/quote]

    It's mostly just water with supplements in it. Not much in the way of actual food.

  • SuggaD
    SuggaD Posts: 1,369 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    RGv2 wrote: »
    SuggaD wrote: »
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    Envious :(

    If I could burn like that I could eat more!!!! :(

    Doesnt matter right now, doctor upper my topamax for my brain injury. I cant feel my appetite, forget to eat, can barely choke down 1000 cals past few days.

    I have to get some shakes and donuts next shopping trip so when I do eat something it has some real calories in it, at least for a little while.

    If that doesnt work I am going to have to set a "remember to eat" timer :(

    I endurance cycle. A 65-100 mile ride, especially a hilly one, will burn a ton of calories...more than you can realistically eat back.

    Challenge accepted.

    It's not as glorious as it sounds. 100 miles you will burn about 3500 calories or so and takes between 5-7 hours depending on the person. Most cyclists consume about 500-700 calories per hour while cycling for energy.... I actually consume more than I burn during a ride.... :(

    No one should be eating 500-700 calories per hour cycling. FeedZone Portables provides a great explanation of caloric needs during a ride based on your average ride speed and distance. I only consume around 150-200 calories per hour on a long ride. So I usually do end up netting around 3000 extra calories and then add my regular caloric needs in....that's a lot of food. I have hit the Indian buffet on occasion and managed to eat it back, but those are the only times. And since I switched to making my own ride food, I'm not very hungry after, so can't come close, so I just plan on going over on the days following. Highly recommend checking out the FeedZone Portables book.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,487 Member
    Copy and pasted from another thread:

    BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate): The number of calories you burn at complete rest.
    EAT (Exercise Associated Thermogenesis): Caloric requirements of training, or training expenditure.
    NEAT (Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis): Caloric requirements of activity that is not planned exercise. Vacuuming, driving, brushing your teeth, for example.
    TEF/DIT (Thermic Effect of Feeding or Diet Induced Thermogenesis): Caloric expense of eating/digestion.
    TDEE: (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) = Sum of the above. BMR+EAT+NEAT+TEF


    Exercise calories, as they are typically used in MFP specifically, is represented by EAT in the above definition. Whether or not you should eat your EAT (giggity) depends on what system or method you are using to calculate your intake needs.

    If you are using most other online calculation tools to determine an intake estimate, that estimate is going to already include EAT as part of the suggested intake. For example, it will ask you an activity factor that includes an average of your exercise, and with this it increases your TDEE to account for the fact that you are exercising.

    If you are using MFP to tell you how much to eat, that estimate is NOT going to include EAT as part of the intake estimate.

    Myfitnesspal uses a caloric estimation tool that expects you to eat back calories burned during exercise.

    Consequently, MFP will essentially give you a LOWER intake estimate than an external TDEE calculator would give you.


    In other words:

    You tell MFP: I'd like to lose 1lb/week.

    MFP says: Hey, you should eat X calories every day to lose 1lb/week.

    You then decide to exercise and you burn 400 calories.

    MFP says: Hey you pecker, you said you wanted to lose 1lb/week. Now you need to eat X+400 because you told me you wanted to lose 1lb/week.


    So based on this:

    If you are using MFP to tell you how many calories to eat, you should probably be eating back some portion of your exercise calories.

    If you are using an external calculator and then customizing your intake to match that, you should not be eating back your exercise calories.

    Lastly: Exercise expenditure is often over-stated.

    My general opinion is that it's much simpler and uses less guess-work to use a custom intake and just forget about the exercise calorie model entirely, but that's a different topic of sorts, more discussion of which can be found here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/819055-setting-your-calorie-and-macro-targets
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited January 2015
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Thanks Malibu for the link, awesome thread
    Billieljaime, I have several jars of peanut butter on the go, I have 1 smooth, 1 nutty and 1 course one that's really dry it's gorgeous, quite difficult to eat 10g.
    Yesterday I ate 1000 cals burned 1400 calories from exercise = how much peanut butter does that equate too ?

    Why on earth did you eat less than what is the lowest recommended calorie goal for women? I believe the low end for men is like 1500. :noway:

    1400 calories is a little over 7 servings of PB.


    I only EVER manage 1400 calorie plus burns on mountain hiking and those are ten plus mile treks that take over a day with altitudes of five or more miles up (one way).

    In those instances I will celebrate and eat a WHOLE JAR if I damn well please :)

    Other than those extreme work outs at 5' almost 3" and 129 pounds, female, and almost 40 years old,
    i can never EVER burn more than seemingly 200 cals per hour MAYBE 300 if I work at max capacity hell maybe 400-500 at SUPER MAX capacity

    but 1400 cal burn? that is an all day mountain climbing burn for me!

    How do people get such enormous burns?

    I think I did when I ran a half marathon and then rode my bike for a while afterwards to help not get stiff.

    Doesn't really work as an everyday thing, though.

    I'm 5'3, 129, and 45, however. ;-)
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    andysport1 wrote: »
    Has anyone got more accurate burns for
    Running 10,9 & 8 min miles
    Walking at 2mph & 3mph (I do this at work whilst doing other things)
    Spinning class
    Bodypump
    I go hard in the classes

    The rough math for running and walking is based on weight * distance * caloric constant

    For walking .. net calories .3 * weight in pounds * distance in miles
    running ... net calories .63 * weight in pounds * distance in miles

    http://www.runnersworld.com/weight-loss/how-many-calories-are-you-really-burning?page=single
This discussion has been closed.