better to run or cycle ?

Saab_2015
Saab_2015 Posts: 277 Member
edited November 11 in Fitness and Exercise
Rather than running is it better to cycle as long as you do the same amount of calories ?
«1

Replies

  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,178 Member
    Better in what way?
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Better for what?
    Getting somewhere - yes.

    It really depends on your enjoyment and objectives.
    I do both.

    For weight loss - a calorie burn is a burn. Cycling is usually more efficient and it is harder for a novice to get the equivalent burn in the given time. YMMV - a hard climb on a bike is a long slow lovely death that I just can't get on a run.

  • GaleHawkins
    GaleHawkins Posts: 8,159 Member
    Your joints will say cycling I expect as long as you do not crash. :)
  • bigd66218
    bigd66218 Posts: 376 Member
    Burn more calories running, your knees will hurt less if you cycle.
  • Saab_2015
    Saab_2015 Posts: 277 Member
    I find cycling easier but naturally need to cycle for longer to reach same calorie count. When I run feel like I have had a harder work out but then again its harder on the joints. I guess its the same if you walk up a hill or run around it 10 times if its the same calorie count does it just fall on preference ?
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    Saab_2015 wrote: »
    Rather than running is it better to cycle as long as you do the same amount of calories ?

    Depends what you want to achieve.

    Cycling burns about half the volume of calories by time, it's harder to get into the lactate threshold and anaerobic ranges. Subject to how you ride it can be either quad or hamstring dominant. It's lower impact.

    Running is a very efficient way to burn energy, but it can be higher impact and is much more susceptible to poor form. The point upthread about harder on the joints is nonsense, but if your running form is poor then injury risk can be slightly higher.

    Cycling involves a big investment in cash, and it's less adaptable to personal lifestyle like work travel and the like. Running is easy to do if you travel a lot.

    Personally I predominantly run and use cycling as cross training. It's complementary and the quad/ hamstring work really helps my running a lot. Equally the running helps my cycling performance through increased aerobic capacity.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    bigd66218 wrote: »
    Burn more calories running, your knees will hurt less if you cycle.

    Your knees will hurt less if your running form is reasonable.

    And cycling can give similar overuse injuries to the knees and ankles, along with some different overuse injuries.
  • corgicake
    corgicake Posts: 846 Member
    Six on one hand, half a dozen on the other.

    Which one do you enjoy more?
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Saab_2015 wrote: »
    I find cycling easier but naturally need to cycle for longer to reach same calorie count. When I run feel like I have had a harder work out but then again its harder on the joints. I guess its the same if you walk up a hill or run around it 10 times if its the same calorie count does it just fall on preference ?

    Yes, preference drives adherence.
    Do what you like and do it (reasonably) often.


  • TriShamelessly
    TriShamelessly Posts: 905 Member
    Calorie burns for each will depend on your effort, time and distance. At a race pace, I burn close to a 1000 calories per hour cycling. I can top that easily running at a good clip. I still prefer cycling though I do both regularly.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    Do both... and start swimming...
  • beemerphile1
    beemerphile1 Posts: 1,710 Member
    Cycling burns less calories in a given amount of time than running. That is because running is a weight bearing exercise and cycling is not.

    However, the benefit of cycling is the lack of impact.

    I do both but due to recurring injuries to my feet and ankles, I can only run 2 or 3 times per week. I fill in with cycling. I much prefer running but at 59 years of age, I can't take the pounding anymore.

    Running is convenient in that it requires very little equipment and can be done about anywhere.

    If you are only looking for exercise, you don't need an expensive bicycle. A Walmart cruiser will provide all the exercise you need. Eventually you may want to go faster and longer and will be tempted to buy a better bike.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    Cycling burns less calories in a given amount of time than running. That is because running is a weight bearing exercise and cycling is not.

    I have a few years of recorded fitness data that disagree with this. Cycling and running are pretty much identical in their energy expenditure assuming similar efforts as measured by heart rate.

    Now if you want to argue that you work harder while running, thus getting your heart rate higher, you might be on to something but that is an individual thing. However if you are training to hit specific power or heart rate targets, your energy expenditure will be similar for both types of efforts.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Cycling for me - I enjoy it and it's kind to my damaged knees.
    I have less knee discomfort from 100 mile cycle rides than I do from a 2 mile run.

    Used to enjoy sprinting but anything over 100m I've always found dull and hateful. I only run once in a blue moon now for sporting performance reasons.

    Did a few organised 5k runs (for free beer!) and did one 10k run for the challenge - finished with the thought that it was probably the dullest exercise I have ever endured. It's just not for me.

    As for calorie burns you can hit maximal effort with either.
  • goddessofawesome
    goddessofawesome Posts: 563 Member
    Depends on which one you like better.

    I personally like both.
  • _mr_b
    _mr_b Posts: 302 Member
    For burn - both the same, if you find you burn less calories on one or the other you're not pushing yourself to the same level.

    As for your question, the 'better' one if burn is the same - pick the one you enjoy most. You could spend all day discussing the relative impact levels, muscle groups used, likelihood of injury etc but why go for one over the other if you just don't like it? If you don't enjoy your exercise you'll do less of it.

    For me the bike wins every time, MTB or road I find it more enjoyable. I still go for the occasional run for cross-training and general fitness purposes though (also because I have a tendency to forget to charge my lights up). I'll never do a long run whereas 80-100 miles on the road bike is fine, and therefore the bike will always burn more calories for me.

    Do the sport you enjoy most.
  • lchadwick3
    lchadwick3 Posts: 66 Member
    I agree with above posts. The best thing to do is get a heart rate monitor and use an app like strava or map my ride. Anything that can show you your heart rate while you're riding. you'll probably find that its hard to get your heart rate up to the same level you do with running. Just find a hill to ride or a safe place to do sprints. Know your heart rate zones so you can tell when you're going hard enough.

    It's a great way to recuperate from injured knees.
    Once I started, I got hooked and began doing duathlons and now am trying triathlons.
    You can keep the cost low if you start with an older or basic road bike.
    I bought my first bike for $80 at a yard sale. An older Cannondale. They didn't know what they had. Then my brother upgraded his Trek so I bought his old one for $300. I put an aero bar on it and beat plenty of people riding tri bikes worth thousands.

    Just make sure you know what you're doing out there riding on the road. It can be safe if you follow basic cycling rules of the road.
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    Assuming you burn the same amount of calories, it doesn't much matter. Let your individual goals and personal preference be your guide.
  • diegops1
    diegops1 Posts: 154 Member
    Myth: cycling is easier on knees than running. I did serious damage to my right knee by pushing too tall a gear up a pass in the Cascades. OTOH, I can't run very far due to the effect of the impact on a back injury that never completely healed. So I cycle, but make sure I don't fall below 50 rpm. Spin, Spin, Spin.
  • Texas_Toast_27
    Texas_Toast_27 Posts: 14 Member
    corgicake wrote: »
    Six on one hand, half a dozen on the other.

    Which one do you enjoy more?

    +1. This is the right answer. You will be motivated to get out and do the activity you love.

  • lax75
    lax75 Posts: 118 Member
    For anyone concerned about bone density loss (not OP I expect, but maybe others reading this thread) running is a weight-bearing activity and will therefor help strengthen your bones, and cycling is not.

    Also, mixing it up may help avoid some of the over-use injuries people have mentioned, so do some of each!
  • jennifershoo
    jennifershoo Posts: 3,198 Member
    Whatever float your boat!
  • SuggaD
    SuggaD Posts: 1,369 Member
    Calories burned is about the same for me, but I ride hard and do a lot of tough rides (climbing wise). So do whichever you like better. I find each helps the other. When I'm running consistently, I ride faster and climb easier. And vice versa. Plus, as someone else said, for bone density reasons, you really should cross-train if cycling is what you do most often.
  • htimpaired
    htimpaired Posts: 1,404 Member
    edited January 2015
    bigd66218 wrote: »
    Burn more calories running, your knees will hurt less if you cycle.

    It's a myth that running hurts your knees. If you cross train and use proper running form, there should be no knee issues.
    Of course, if you already have bad knees because of injury or genetics or whatever, then the above may not be true.

    I run, and I attend spinning classes. I think with cycling, it depends on how to cycle. It is easy to sit on a stationary bike at a low gear and spin easily for hours without burning much. Likewise, crank up the gear and you'll get one hell of an intense workout.

    The best is the exercise you enjoy doing and can commit to.
  • dbzs
    dbzs Posts: 9 Member
    Swim.
  • sevsmom
    sevsmom Posts: 1,172 Member
    Because I abhor cycling....I say running is WAY better. :D
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    If you want to be a runner you should run...if you want to be a cyclist, you should cycle.

    Personally, I prefer cycling and I don't run anymore due to issues that tend to arise with my plantar fasciitis and posterior tibial tendinitis after running. I also enjoy swimming in the warmer months and I wish I could do some running as I always wanted to try a sprint triathlon...but it's not in the cards.

    Do what you enjoy doing...that way you'll go do it.
  • Saab_2015
    Saab_2015 Posts: 277 Member
    Thanks guys I agree with you all even the swimming suggestions. Will try to vary it and main thing to remember I have picked up is to keep the form. Will ask the question is it ok to run/cycle in the gym when it's cold tomorrow ... Feel free to call me lazy lol
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    htimpaired wrote: »
    bigd66218 wrote: »
    Burn more calories running, your knees will hurt less if you cycle.

    It's a myth that running hurts your knees. If you cross train and use proper running form, there should be no knee issues.
    Of course, if you already have bad knees because of injury or genetics or whatever, then the above may not be true.

    A friend of mine used to complain endlessly that he cant run, or do X activity because he has no ACL left in one knee and a repaired ACL in the other.

    Well the guy just ran his first full marathon after competing in a number of half marathons and triathlons up to the Half Iron distance.

    Whining that running is bad for the knees is just an excuse and my friend is the proof


  • gobonas99
    gobonas99 Posts: 1,049 Member
    glevinso wrote: »
    Do both... and start swimming...

    And then throw them all together in one session! :smiley: Swim/Bike/Run FTW!! :smiley:
This discussion has been closed.