An open letter to foodies... stop labelling things as "guilt free"

punkrockgoth
punkrockgoth Posts: 534 Member
edited November 13 in Food and Nutrition
Dear food bloggers, manufacturers, food instagrammers and Internet nutritionists etc,

Please, please, please stop labelling food as "guilt free". There are a lot of reasons why people eat and choose the foods they do. There are a lot of reasons why people struggle with their weights.

But food is food and a healthful diet includes everything in moderation. But to worship or demonize food only encourages obsessive thinking and failure in long term health management. To label something as "guilt free" tells people that they need to feel guilty for eating some foods, but it's okay to binge on others. That approach is not conducive to balance and total health. This creates taboos which serve to perpetuate stigmas and encourage shame and deviation from a healthy lifestyle.

Food is food and it is okay to love food. It's okay to love spinach and kale and Oreos and peanut butter and nachos and anything else under the sun. There is no need to feel guilty for loving any of it.

So please, food bloggers, manufacturers, Instagrammers and Internet nutritionists, please in the future, try to focus on encouraging moderation, maximizing satisfaction to portion size ratios of your dishes or create smaller portion sizes of foods high in sugars, fats and salt. With your co-operation, we can make the world a better and all around healthier place.

Sincerely,
Sarah

«13

Replies

  • tinascar2015
    tinascar2015 Posts: 413 Member
    Oh YES!!! And they also need to stop labeling foods as "bad".
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    Clapping-gif-tumblr-i19.gif

    I especially loved this part:
    Food is food and it is okay to love food. It's okay to love spinach and kale and Oreos and peanut butter and nachos and anything else under the sun. There is no need to feel guilty for loving any of it.

    The sooner the human race realizes this, the better off we will be.
  • HeySwoleSister
    HeySwoleSister Posts: 1,938 Member
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.
  • DanniB423
    DanniB423 Posts: 777 Member
    EWJLang wrote: »
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.
    LOL!
  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    EWJLang wrote: »
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.
    Nope, not even then. Unless they were a baby or something. Then maybe.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.
  • HeySwoleSister
    HeySwoleSister Posts: 1,938 Member
    OdesAngel wrote: »
    EWJLang wrote: »
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.
    Nope, not even then. Unless they were a baby or something. Then maybe.

    Well, if your name is Jean Valjean, you can steal some food without guilt. But if you, say, come to my house and finish my last tub of Talenti? You'd better feel guilty.

    And afraid. Very, very afraid.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    My main gripe with that label is that it's often not even accurate. Just because something has less fat than the original doesn't mean it still doesn't have a crazy amount of calories. Sometimes I look at what people call 'guilt free' and just shake my head. 20% less calories is just not worth losing so much taste most of the time.
  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    EWJLang wrote: »
    OdesAngel wrote: »
    EWJLang wrote: »
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.
    Nope, not even then. Unless they were a baby or something. Then maybe.

    Well, if your name is Jean Valjean, you can steal some food without guilt. But if you, say, come to my house and finish my last tub of Talenti? You'd better feel guilty.

    And afraid. Very, very afraid.

    t0201.gif
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    Can I add to this
    "I'm a foodie- I love food- you wouldn't understand"

    I hate when people tell people that, as if I eat cardboard and hate real food just because I'm fit.
    <rollseyes> I can't even with you people. Grump.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    Foodie, that's such a stupid label, something a toddler came up with.

    I really dislike it.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    dbmata wrote: »
    Foodie, that's such a stupid label, something a toddler came up with.

    I really dislike it.

    Ha, I agree. Isn't everyone who enjoys eating food a foodie? I enjoy reading - does that make me a bookie?
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    If you're a bookie...

    what's the spread on the 4th race at Santa Anita today? lol.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    Four. Your answer is four.

    I think I have a knack for this.
  • Megoondas
    Megoondas Posts: 8 Member
    I agree 100%. These labels add an emotional dimension to food, when we need to start looking at food more objectively. Yes, certain foods will release feel-good hormones, but we shouldn't feel guilty for enjoying something. Moderation is the key...something that everyone's probably sick of hearing.
  • lthames0810
    lthames0810 Posts: 722 Member
    dbmata wrote: »
    Foodie, that's such a stupid label, something a toddler came up with.

    I really dislike it.

    Me too. I associate it with food snobs.

  • This content has been removed.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    So wait, what you're saying is it bothers you when I go to a great restaurant and eat a nice looking meal, or cook something awesome or eat an incredible ice cream and I post it online somewhere that bothers you? How exactly does my love of food affect you?

    I think she's saying that she doesn't like when someone labels a lower-calorie (and lower-taste) version of a food as guilt-free, like when someone makes a cauliflower pizza crust and calls it a guilt-free pizza crust, insinuating that one should feel guilty for eating real pizza.

    She's saying that we shouldn't feel guilty about eating any food, period. She's one of the good guys. :wink:
  • HeySwoleSister
    HeySwoleSister Posts: 1,938 Member
    ^^this^^
  • wizzybeth
    wizzybeth Posts: 3,578 Member
    Yup. Everything I eat is "guilt free."
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    No, eating more calories than we burn is making us fat. Labels just complicate things for people who already don't know crap about nutrition.
  • tulips_and_tea
    tulips_and_tea Posts: 5,744 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    Exactly. It's lack of knowledge or desire to learn what we need to do to take care of ourselves. This labeling is just yet another marketing ploy and we all need to be smart enough to see past it.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    BZAH10 wrote: »
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    Exactly. It's lack of knowledge or desire to learn what we need to do to take care of ourselves. This labeling is just yet another marketing ploy and we all need to be smart enough to see past it.

    Yep.
  • jimmmer
    jimmmer Posts: 3,515 Member
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    If you eat enough of them to put you in a calorie surplus....
  • 7seas_sailing
    7seas_sailing Posts: 224 Member
    I love food! I DEARLY LOVE FOOD!!!! With that said, I may not eat organic all the time, but I try to looks at the macros and avoid eating anything that requires more chemistry than I had in high school - which was zilch.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    edited March 2015
    BZAH10 wrote: »
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    Exactly. It's lack of knowledge or desire to learn what we need to do to take care of ourselves. This labeling is just yet another marketing ploy and we all need to be smart enough to see past it.

    Yep.

    This is basically what I said, yet you agree with her and disagree with me.

    Starting to think you like to argue just for the sake of arguing.

    It is indeed a marketing ploy that overcomplicates nutrition. Nutrition is not complicated, and if the population would realize that instead of labeling foods as good or bad, we might could actually overcome this obesity "epidemic." Although it's really more of an ignorance epidemic, IMO.

    *edit - changed him to her, I didn't see the original poster of the quoted response, sorry!
  • Dragn77
    Dragn77 Posts: 810 Member
    edited March 2015
    EWJLang wrote: »
    The only reason to feel guilty about eating food is if you stole it from someone.

    No way...if I steal food off someone elses plate, I can eat totally guilt free because then the calories don't count. Stuff like this puts balance back into the world.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    jimmmer wrote: »
    It's just a label. Perhaps you are reading too much into it.

    I disagree. It's labels like "clean," "guilt-free," "junk food," "healthy," etc., that make people so confused these days about nutrition and overeating. If people weren't thrown so many terms all the time about what they eat, and understood calories and how they relate to their bodies, people might not find it so difficult to eat in moderation.

    Food is food, and I think that glamourizing and demonizing different types of foods is contributing to the obesity epidemic by overcomplicating things.

    I disagree. Labels aren't making us fat.

    If you eat enough of them to put you in a calorie surplus....

    Nah, it's mostly fiber and slides right through.
This discussion has been closed.