Viewing the message boards in:

Drop calories or do cardio? Which would you prefer?

135

Replies

  • Posts: 2 Member
    Definitely do more cardio! I find the more exercise I do, the less inclined I am to binge on bad foods!

    Agreed. It just takes too much work to burn it off. I am glad to have the option though.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »

    Lol

    X2 :)
  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    BILLBRYTAN wrote: »

    COMPLETELY WRONG!! I eat an average of 2500 calories per day in the space of 4 hours and I don't eat for 20. I have been doing this all of 2015 so far and have achieved amazing results. Similar stories appear all over the internet if you take the time to research them.

    What you describe is 100% consistent with the posting you're declaring to be "COMPLETELY WRONG".

  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    PS "For all of 2015" would be a bit more meaningful if we weren't in April. Just a free pro tip for ya. :drinker:
  • Posts: 352 Member
    For me, a healthy heart muscle is more important than shapely delts. However, since I mix up cardio and strength training, I'm getting to be smoking hot on the inside and out.

    This. As I get older, looking ripped is less and less important to me, but a strong heart muscle is something I still want.
  • Posts: 664 Member
    BILLBRYTAN wrote: »

    COMPLETELY WRONG!! I eat an average of 2500 calories per day in the space of 4 hours and I don't eat for 20. I have been doing this all of 2015 so far and have achieved amazing results. Similar stories appear all over the internet if you take the time to research them. I have lost 30 pounds since starting in January and my testosterone and hgh are incredible for my age 62. I have been obese since childhood and wish I had known this 40 years ago but I was too busy listening to doctors and other so called experts who knew nothing about nutrition. INTERMITTENT FASTING apparently only works for about 90% of healthy people but it costs nothing and is possible to continue on a long term basis. I have only cheated for 2 days out of 4 months and find this lifestyle relatively easy to maintain.

    Have you eaten 2500 calories a day NOT intermittent fasting for the same period of time with different results?

    Or did you go from eating whatever you wanted, whenever without any moderation, straight to an IF lifestyle?
  • Posts: 15,573 Member
    I hate cardio. I'm currently going into maintenance and doing none, just to kind of see how little I can get away with and still enjoy enough food. I'm also trying a recomp though, so even if I add some in, it won't be much.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    BILLBRYTAN wrote: »
    WRONG!! Intermittent fasting yields results far beyond those of mere calorie cutting. Fasting alters the metabolism in a positive manner and promotes proper hormonal balance.


    peter56765 wrote: »

    This. As I get older, looking ripped is less and less important to me, but a strong heart muscle is something I still want.

    100% agree.. but not to presume being ripped doesn't mean not having a healthy heart either.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    Can y
    Mr_Knight wrote: »

    What you describe is 100% consistent with the posting you're declaring to be "COMPLETELY WRONG".

    Can you tell us your suggestions for the most time efficient way to hold muscle and maintain single digit bodyfat not lose strength while without feeling miserable year round with relative ease and not worrying a greal deal about food or cardio. You seem to know. :) real keen to learn what your approach to these things are.
  • Posts: 1,122 Member
    mtvstaff wrote: »

    Yes that is correct but if you expend calories and put them back you are at square one again. But i do understand what you are saying.

    No, you're not...

    You're at minus your BMR added to minus your exercise calories. If you're just using BMR, you're only minus your BMR.
  • Posts: 57 Member

    No, you're not...

    You're at minus your BMR added to minus your exercise calories. If you're just using BMR, you're only minus your BMR.

    Lol re read the full conversations. :)
  • Posts: 664 Member

    No, you're not...

    You're at minus your BMR added to minus your exercise calories. If you're just using BMR, you're only minus your BMR.

    He doesn't math or science. There's nothing we can do for him. He's already gone.
  • Posts: 1,122 Member
    DirrtyH wrote: »

    He doesn't math or science. There's nothing we can do for him. He's already gone.

    I did not see that this was three pages long when I commented. I only have 15 minutes left at work to enjoy the delicious hilarity that is apparently contained herein.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    If you burn 400 and eat 400 your back at square one. That's with your BMR as it was.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    Haha

    I did not see that this was three pages long when I commented. I only have 15 minutes left at work to enjoy the delicious hilarity that is apparently contained herein.

    Haha All good :)
  • Posts: 1,122 Member
    mtvstaff wrote: »
    If you burn 400 and eat 400 your back at square one. That's with your BMR as it was.

    No, you're at square negative BMR.
  • Posts: 1,942 Member
    I luv me some cardio. Making time for my 3 day a week workout at the dojo is never a problem. It is just a part of my weekly routine. It's not negotiable. And to be honest I really enjoy it. And the extra calories for dessert afterward are a nice plus. :)
  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    edited April 2015
    mtvstaff wrote: »
    Can y
    Can you tell us your suggestions for the most time efficient way to hold muscle and maintain single digit bodyfat not lose strength while without feeling miserable year round with relative ease and not worrying a greal deal about food or cardio. You seem to know. :) real keen to learn what your approach to these things are.

    What does that have to do with the topic of the thread?

    IF is awesome sauce. Love it, do it.

    But that doesn't change the fact that for the vast majority of people**, a small eating window will make no noticeable difference compared to eating the same calories in some other pattern.

    Nor does it change the fact that you strongly disagreed with a post that was actually consistent with what you yourself were claiming. :smile:



    ** Nice attempt at backtracking with the addition of the "single digit body fat" qualification. :drinker: :smiley:
  • Posts: 57 Member

    Thank yi
    Mr_Knight wrote: »

    What does that have to do with the topic of the thread?

    IF is awesome sauce. Love it, do it.

    But that doesn't change the fact that for the vast majority of people**, a small eating window will make no noticeable difference compared to eating the same calories in some other pattern.

    Nor does it change the fact that you strongly disagreed with a post that was actually consistent with what you yourself were claiming. :smile:



    ** Nice attempt at backtracking with the addition of the "single digit body fat" qualification. :drinker: :smiley:

    Yes thank you for confirming my presumptions :)
  • Posts: 57 Member
    Is that not

    No, you're at square negative BMR.

    What not just what i said :)
  • Posts: 286 Member
    edited April 2015
    Could you explain what your BMR consist of, that uses 1983 calories in 24 hours ? Excuse my earlier comment as I did NOT understand what you saying.
  • Posts: 365 Member
    100% drop calories. Why waste energy on "cardio" when you can pump iron instead? I'm 46 and dropped 40 lbs and 8 inches off my waste in 18 months by lifting heavy compound movements 4 days a week, NO CARDIO AT ALL, and just eating at a slight caloric deficit, with plenty of fat and protein. I think cardio is woefully overrated, unless you are just using it for basic conditioning or specifically for a sport. But for body composition? It sucks. Lift weights and eat a bit less.
  • Posts: 10,321 Member
    edited April 2015
    rontafoya wrote: »
    100% drop calories. Why waste energy on "cardio" when you can pump iron instead? I'm 46 and dropped 40 lbs and 8 inches off my waste in 18 months by lifting heavy compound movements 4 days a week, NO CARDIO AT ALL, and just eating at a slight caloric deficit, with plenty of fat and protein. I think cardio is woefully overrated, unless you are just using it for basic conditioning or specifically for a sport. But for body composition? It sucks. Lift weights and eat a bit less.

    I lost 80 in 8 months doing nothing but cardio. And in the 10 months since (equally your 18 months) I have lifted heavy and did cardio to get to a 6' tall, 180lb, and 10-12% bf, dropped 11" from my waist all while eating 3500 cals a day. I'd say my body composition is pretty solid and only getting better. Just sayin'.
  • Posts: 286 Member
    mtvstaff wrote: »

    I understand what calculator you used, can you explain what is in the calculation of 1983 calories ?
  • Posts: 57 Member

    I understand what calculator you used, can you explain what is in the calculation of 1983 calories ?

    That's what I burn sedentary based on no movement. Doing nothing this is what my body burns.
  • Posts: 57 Member
    999tigger wrote: »

    You do realise Charlieruns is 100% correct above and your understanding is fundamentally flawed. How can you be so confused about such a simple concept?


    Oh and my answer was, its a balance of both and will depend on the day whether I have enough energy and willpower to do more exercise (subject to an overtraining excess) or whether I want to eat less or sacrifice some of my deficit.

    The only one confused is you . :)
  • Posts: 5,235 Member
    peter56765 wrote: »

    This. As I get older, looking ripped is less and less important to me, but a strong heart muscle is something I still want.

    This absolutely. Id rather be fit including having a good cv system and lowering the risk of heart disease or a weak heart. I do both, but quite a bit of cardio. Why on earth wouldnt you want a good cv system?
This discussion has been closed.