IIFYM

mommy2girls1
mommy2girls1 Posts: 6 Member
edited November 18 in Food and Nutrition
i am starting IIFYM today, anyone have a simple plan for this? I am using the MFP app on my phone and changed my settings appropriately.

Replies

  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    What do you mean by a simple plan?

  • mommy2girls1
    mommy2girls1 Posts: 6 Member
    Is there a place to help me find recipes? Or the macros calculated for certain foods? This is very new to me, I'm afraid I'll mess this up.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    Keep in mind that the IIFYM is just a calculator that is capitalizing on the concept. There is no one size fits all macro ratio and that calculator uses the TDEE method.

    Conceptually, IIFYM was meant for people to establish reasonable macro goals...it was born out of the fitness industry, not the diet industry, so one's optimal macros would be as per their fitness goals. Basically one's macros would be set for optimal or close to optimal performance. From there, you just eat food within those macro goals and calorie goals. There is no demonization of food or food groups...another word for it is "flexible" dieting. Basically, "hey...can I have some ice cream?"....IIFYM.

    To that end, the original intent has also been pretty well bastardized and despite what a lot of people think, IIFYM doesn't mean just eat whatever and fill you day with "junk". If one has established a solid macro ratio, they'd be hard pressed to fill their days with junk. Most people who follow this concept eat a lot of healthy, nutritious foods...we're just not scared of a little desert.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    all you need to do is hit your protein/fat/carb minimums and fill in the rest from there. There are no "recipes" you eat what fits into your macros, hence, IIFYM....

    However, you should still eat nutrient dense foods, and then mix in treats.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    Is there a place to help me find recipes? Or the macros calculated for certain foods? This is very new to me, I'm afraid I'll mess this up.

    You just eat food in portions that are appropriate for your calorie goals and macro goals. You can track everything on MFP...when you enter food into your diary it is going to tell you how many grams of protein, fat, and carbs are in stuff. From there, you adjust your diet accordingly.

    You can't really mess anything up...there's nothing to mess up. Trying to be bang on is an exercise in futility but with a little practice you can start balancing out your diet and getting close.

    Keep in mind also that IIFYM isn't some kind of super natural weightloss diet. It's just a concept that avoids demonization of food. Ultimately your calorie intake is going to dictate your weight.
  • mommy2girls1
    mommy2girls1 Posts: 6 Member
    Ok, I eat pretty clean, no sugar or flour, so I think this will be easier than I originally thought. Just need to focus on it a little more.
  • cityruss
    cityruss Posts: 2,493 Member
    Ok, I eat pretty clean, no sugar or flour, so I think this will be easier than I originally thought. Just need to focus on it a little more.

    Is there a reason you are eliminating entire food groups?
  • acollis1
    acollis1 Posts: 167 Member
    Is "sugar" a food group? LOL!
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    acollis1 wrote: »
    Is "sugar" a food group? LOL!
    Since it's in fruit, vegetables, dairy....I would say so.
  • daniebanks
    daniebanks Posts: 179 Member
    Plan your meals the day before, makes it alot easier to hit your macros because it's planned out.. That way you could also factor in desert or a snack if you wanted .. Flexible dieting is the best :smile:
  • daniebanks
    daniebanks Posts: 179 Member
    it will take a bit of practice, but worth it
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    Eat. Under your calories. Consider protein.
  • mommy2girls1
    mommy2girls1 Posts: 6 Member
    I do honey for sweetener, I guess that is considered sugar. I took out cookies, cake etc.
  • mommy2girls1
    mommy2girls1 Posts: 6 Member
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    Is there a place to help me find recipes? Or the macros calculated for certain foods? This is very new to me, I'm afraid I'll mess this up.

    You just eat food in portions that are appropriate for your calorie goals and macro goals. You can track everything on MFP...when you enter food into your diary it is going to tell you how many grams of protein, fat, and carbs are in stuff. From there, you adjust your diet accordingly.

    You can't really mess anything up...there's nothing to mess up. Trying to be bang on is an exercise in futility but with a little practice you can start balancing out your diet and getting close.

    Keep in mind also that IIFYM isn't some kind of super natural weightloss diet. It's just a concept that avoids demonization of food. Ultimately your calorie intake is going to dictate your weight.

    Have a feeling the part in bold is going to fly right over OP's head so I'm bolding it...

    OP you mentioned that you eliminated sugar and flour - do you have a medical reason to be restricting these foods?
  • mantium999
    mantium999 Posts: 1,490 Member
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.
  • bellaa_x0
    bellaa_x0 Posts: 1,062 Member
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,267 Member
    What is your fat set at if you are going over it so quickly?
  • This content has been removed.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Maybe your fat percentage is too low for your particular needs. The question is why you picked the particular numbers you did and what you are low on if you are high on fat. Carb vs. fat percentage in particular is largely a matter of personal preference/how it affects you.
  • bellaa_x0
    bellaa_x0 Posts: 1,062 Member
    edited May 2015
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.
  • This content has been removed.
  • mantium999
    mantium999 Posts: 1,490 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.

    IIFYM is not a diet or specific way macros need to be set up. The IIFYM site does have a site to set up macros but it is not limited to that site. Many people on MFP alone will set up their intake and macros on their own based on there preferences and then follow an IIFYM eating style. It doesn't mean that you have to hit the targets exactly or are restricted to a specific buffer. As I said earlier, fat and protein are minimums, carbs are discretionary. Many people will make sure they have protein and fat at least meeting minimums then letting the rest fall where they please while also paying attention to getting in proper micros/vitamins/minerals.

    The point of setting up macros and going over on some macros here or there is that we have the ability to do that because targets are minimums. Just because we don't follow a specific buffer does not mean we shouldn't bother to track macronutrients at all.

    Agree with the above. By hitting protein and fat as minimums, while ensuring you stay within your calorie target, allows carbs to be the wild card. Rather than worrying about "evil" sugar, if you maintain focus on the ultimate goal of staying within your calorie target, and hitting a minimum target on protein and fat, than your carb consumption no longer matters, and allows you to take an often misguided concern out of the picture. Unless you have a medical concern (diabetes or insulin issues), or are an endurance athlete, who needs to pay more attention to their carb intake.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.

    IIFYM is not a diet or specific way macros need to be set up. The IIFYM site does have a site to set up macros but it is not limited to that site. Many people on MFP alone will set up their intake and macros on their own based on there preferences and then follow an IIFYM eating style. It doesn't mean that you have to hit the targets exactly or are restricted to a specific buffer. As I said earlier, fat and protein are minimums, carbs are discretionary. Many people will make sure they have protein and fat at least meeting minimums then letting the rest fall where they please while also paying attention to getting in proper micros/vitamins/minerals.

    The point of setting up macros and going over on some macros here or there is that we have the ability to do that because targets are minimums. Just because we don't follow a specific buffer does not mean we shouldn't bother to track macronutrients at all.

    cosign
    mantium999 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.

    IIFYM is not a diet or specific way macros need to be set up. The IIFYM site does have a site to set up macros but it is not limited to that site. Many people on MFP alone will set up their intake and macros on their own based on there preferences and then follow an IIFYM eating style. It doesn't mean that you have to hit the targets exactly or are restricted to a specific buffer. As I said earlier, fat and protein are minimums, carbs are discretionary. Many people will make sure they have protein and fat at least meeting minimums then letting the rest fall where they please while also paying attention to getting in proper micros/vitamins/minerals.

    The point of setting up macros and going over on some macros here or there is that we have the ability to do that because targets are minimums. Just because we don't follow a specific buffer does not mean we shouldn't bother to track macronutrients at all.

    Agree with the above. By hitting protein and fat as minimums, while ensuring you stay within your calorie target, allows carbs to be the wild card. Rather than worrying about "evil" sugar, if you maintain focus on the ultimate goal of staying within your calorie target, and hitting a minimum target on protein and fat, than your carb consumption no longer matters, and allows you to take an often misguided concern out of the picture. Unless you have a medical concern (diabetes or insulin issues), or are an endurance athlete, who needs to pay more attention to their carb intake.

    cosign
  • Nony_Mouse
    Nony_Mouse Posts: 5,646 Member
    I do honey for sweetener, I guess that is considered sugar. I took out cookies, cake etc.

    This is pretty much the antithesis of IIFYM. There is no reason you can't have those things if you are sticking to your calorie allowance and otherwise meeting your nutritional needs in terms of macros and micros. It is more difficult at a low calorie allowance (like 1200), but by no means impossible.
  • Sarasmaintaining
    Sarasmaintaining Posts: 1,027 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.

    IIFYM is not a diet or specific way macros need to be set up. The IIFYM site does have a site to set up macros but it is not limited to that site. Many people on MFP alone will set up their intake and macros on their own based on there preferences and then follow an IIFYM eating style. It doesn't mean that you have to hit the targets exactly or are restricted to a specific buffer. As I said earlier, fat and protein are minimums, carbs are discretionary. Many people will make sure they have protein and fat at least meeting minimums then letting the rest fall where they please while also paying attention to getting in proper micros/vitamins/minerals.

    The point of setting up macros and going over on some macros here or there is that we have the ability to do that because targets are minimums. Just because we don't follow a specific buffer does not mean we shouldn't bother to track macronutrients at all.

    I'm interested in starting to focus on macros/IIFYM-do you recommend the IIFYM site to figure out your macros ratios, or did you use some other way to figure out your percentages? (I'm assuming by your post you use/used IIFYM). Currently I'm maintaining and doing some minimal body weight strength training, but I want to bump up the intensity of that during the next few months. I think tracking protein and such would be beneficial as I change my fitness goals.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Sarasmaintaining
    Sarasmaintaining Posts: 1,027 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    bellaa_x0 wrote: »
    mantium999 wrote: »
    I am having a hard time staying under my fat allowance each day. Once I have my peanut or almond butter with my apple for a snack, and any kind of cheese, I am done for the day, it seems. I use almond milk with my coffee, maybe I should go back to fat free milk?

    Under IIFYM, fat is a minimum, not a maximum. You shouldn't be trying to stay under it.

    you're supposed to stay within your macro goals +/- 5 using IIFYM.

    Not necessarily. Protein and fat are minimums. If you go over protein of fat by 10 and it comes at the expense of carbs there's nothing wrong with that.

    why even have macros then if you aren't trying to meet them? people set their macros specific to their goals.. that's the whole point of IIFYM. if you're going to decide to frequently go over/under by more than 5g, whats the point?

    ETA: or just change your macros.

    IIFYM is not a diet or specific way macros need to be set up. The IIFYM site does have a site to set up macros but it is not limited to that site. Many people on MFP alone will set up their intake and macros on their own based on there preferences and then follow an IIFYM eating style. It doesn't mean that you have to hit the targets exactly or are restricted to a specific buffer. As I said earlier, fat and protein are minimums, carbs are discretionary. Many people will make sure they have protein and fat at least meeting minimums then letting the rest fall where they please while also paying attention to getting in proper micros/vitamins/minerals.

    The point of setting up macros and going over on some macros here or there is that we have the ability to do that because targets are minimums. Just because we don't follow a specific buffer does not mean we shouldn't bother to track macronutrients at all.

    I'm interested in starting to focus on macros/IIFYM-do you recommend the IIFYM site to figure out your macros ratios, or did you use some other way to figure out your percentages? (I'm assuming by your post you use/used IIFYM). Currently I'm maintaining and doing some minimal body weight strength training, but I want to bump up the intensity of that during the next few months. I think tracking protein and such would be beneficial as I change my fitness goals.

    I follow what would be classified as IIFYM in the sense that most of my day is filled with things that I know are going to give me the most bang for my buck in nutrition. Eggs, egg whites, fruits, some vegetables, peanut butter, different proteins and such. Once I know I'm in the ballpark I start playing around with choices. The majority of my flexibility comes from carbs. But overall it's mostly whole foods with 200 or 300 discretionary calories.

    I personally have never even used the IIFYM site. I've never read an article or anything. I did just go over to the site to see how it gives you the numbers and I saw you can choose protein and fat at your desired levels. I did plugged in my number to get TDEE and it was the same as what my goal is I set up on my own.
    I set up my own macros and saw it would have the option for me to do them the same with their calculator.

    I set my macros at:
    Protein at .6-.87g per lb of bodyweight
    Fat .4-.45g per lb of bodyweight
    The rest usually goes to carbs. Sometimes more carries over into protein or fat but usually it's not off by much.

    I don't see anything wrong with the calculator itself so I wouldn't say don't use it. Keep in mind IIFYM is not really what so many believe it is or what a few that say they follow IIFYM actually end up doing. The issue is when you say IIFYM to someone that doesn't feel certain things should be eaten the take it as we eat whatever we want all day everyday without any consideration to proper nutrition. Some people do actually do that, but they aren't doing it right. Nutrition matters. We don't all fills our days with pure candy, cake and soda like some say we do.

    At the end of the day if you put a menu of someone that applies IIFYM right and a person that says they "eat clean", you'll see we eat a lot of the same things. The difference in menus will end up in some kind of dessert or 1 of the meals that they cycled in something else.

    You can't really look at my diary because it's empty. I haven't logged in a log time. I still do weigh all my food and portion control I just don't harp on my numbers like I did in the first year.

    Thanks!
This discussion has been closed.