Fit bit calories Do I trust it????
loridebacker
Posts: 24 Member
i am afraid to trust my Fitbit calorie allowance. I have a charge hr so it monitors heartrate and steps. I was very active yesterday and worked out. It says I burned 3143 calories and gave me 2100 calories to eat. I have it set at 2 lb weightloss. I am a female 5 5' 165 lbs.
It just seems like a lot of food! Do I trust it??
It just seems like a lot of food! Do I trust it??
0
Replies
-
Interested in the responses you get. I want to buy a charge HR to see if my TDEE is accurate.
How many steps did you take, what were the activities you did?0 -
Its like I wrote this post myself. Same height, weight and concerned about the calories my fitbit allows. So BUMP0
-
The fitbit in my experience is pretty darn close, especially if you have the one which monitors heartrate etc. If you were very active a calorie burn of 3143 is possible. To be safe I try not to eat all my calorie allowance but do find it handy for those days when I am a little bit more hungry than usual
0 -
I took 23,000 steps. On my feet all day, lots of fast walking. Activity was rebounding for 30 mins and 10 mins of interval training. Heart rate showed 109 active minutes.....0
-
I was very hungry yesterday....probably since I was so active. The day before I got far less activity and wasn't hungry and still had 300 cals to eat that I didn't.0
-
Just seems to good to be true. Lol. Before my Fitbit unwound have thought I totally screwed up if i ate 2200 calories!0
-
If the BMR calculation used in fitbit is the correct one used for your current weight, height and weight and if you have your stride setup correctly (for walking/running) the calories should be pretty accurate. I do not have the HR version, I just have the Charge..
I am curious about what you mean by "i was pretty active yesterday" ... Did you do steady state exercise, did you get a lot of miles logged for walking or "active steps" such as lawn work, cleaning house (leisurely, briskly, etc...).. I would be curious to see what your dashboard looked like yesterday as far as steps and calorie burns to get 3143 calorie burn (the moderate, intense levels)..0 -
Gia07 I posted above what I did for the day....0
-
I think the general advice on this forum is to only eat back half of the exercise calories. Most people and methods of estimating exercise burn are over estimations. By only eating back half you can make up for the over estimation factor.
I have a fit bit Chatge HR also and I feel it's generally pretty good at estimating my effort. However the algorithm that converts your steps/HR to calories burned is buried in the secret sauce of the software I guess. In general I assume the 50% eat back rule and have had good results.0 -
Personally, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that uses formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn.
Instead, I would use something that requires no tools but a way to log your caloric intake. Pic a number of calories to eat that should create a deficit, and eat that amount for a month.
After a month, see how much you've lost compared to how much you've wanted to eat. Lost too much? Eat more. Lost too little? Eat less.
Trial and error.
Over a period of time, you should have it all figured out. No need for all these little things that just make you spend more and more of your hard-earned money. On top of that: What do you do if you lose it or break it? You've grown a dependency on this silly little gadget, so you're going to have to go spend more money on it.
Stop using materialistic gadgets and start using your brain.0 -
from my experience, the charge HR is really good for running but it double estimates calories burnt from walks - I guess it is why people recommend to eat only 50% back
I normally have 500-1000 cal adjustment per day - depending on how much I walk - that I don' eat back and I'm happily maintaining now
0 -
I used to have a Fitbit Charge HR that I used daily.
Comparing heartrate and calorie burn, the Charge HR, in my experience,
seems to slightly overestimate low-intensity exercise calorie burn (such as walking), altho I feel it's pretty close.
Athough, one important thing I'm quite certain of; it UNDERESTIMATES high-intensity exercise calorie burn.
The high-intensity calorie burn is underestimated due to the heartrate tracking.
It seems to have problems tracking heartrate when high, despite following all cues (putting it higher up your arm etc).
Comparing to a heartrate meter with chest strap, the heartrates more than often were off by 20-50 bpm.
In a high-intensity workout that's 30 mins or longer, that can quickly be a 100-200 kcal burn difference.
Also, FitBit's 'active minutes' are counted towards periods of time in which your heartrate goes above a certain level.. So that would explain why it didn't count just the 40 mins of exercise you did, but also other periods of time in which your heartrate went up.0 -
23000 steps is about 10 miles and at 80 calories per mile, that would only be 800 calories extra. So, I'm guessing that 2500 would be a more accurate number.0
-
loridebacker wrote: »i am afraid to trust my Fitbit calorie allowance. I have a charge hr so it monitors heartrate and steps. I was very active yesterday and worked out. It says I burned 3143 calories and gave me 2100 calories to eat. I have it set at 2 lb weightloss. I am a female 5 5' 165 lbs.
It just seems like a lot of food! Do I trust it??
I trust my fitbit but I use the pedometer function only and don't have an HRM one - I'm really not convinced by those and think the calorie burns they give cannot be accurate
I'm 5'8, 160lbs and get around 350-450 calories from around 10K steps (5 miles)
a 45 min workout (based on Polar FT 4 HRM burns) will get me about 350 calories (but it overwrites some of the fitbit steps
my sedentary TDEE is around 1800 calories .. so I'm taller about the same height and I would have a tdee of around 2300 on an active day
so how active was your day?0 -
Hi,
I've had my Fitbit HR since February, and make sure I log all food via MFP. So far it's been quite accurate. I do Insanity Max30 4 times a week, and teach insanity classes twice a week, and it's logged my steps, distance and calorie burn pretty well. So far, I've managed to lose half a stone which is what I had set out to do over the last couple of months.
I'd say it's pretty darn good!!
All the best!0 -
How do I use pedometer mode only?0
-
I tracked my Fitbit TDEE and my calories in since starting back up in February and found that it's pretty darn accurate. I don't always eat back the exercise calories but the numbers still work out and I just end up losing more.0
-
I´ve had a fitbit Charge HR for about 11 weeks now. I trust the calorieburn, and aim to eat at atleast 1000 cal. deficit. Somedays I´ve eaten less, sometimes more, but it usually evens out to a 7000 deficit a week according to the fitbit. In those 11 weeks, I´ve lost about 20 lbs. I trust it.0
-
I have a Garmin Vivofit, had it for about 8 months or so and it has been a great tool in my weight loss/control. I don't eat back all of my calories but I do eat back a good portion. Simply put I'll eat until I feel satisfied. I have lost roughly 20 pounds since I got it.
Bottom line; if you don't trust it why have it?
V/r,
DW.0 -
I have the fitbit flex (steps and activity minutes). I lose weight if I eat back only half the calorie burns. If I eat back all the exercise calories I will gain. Mostly use it as a motivator. Love it0
-
chivalryder wrote: »Personally, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that uses formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn.
Instead, I would use something that requires no tools but a way to log your caloric intake. Pic a number of calories to eat that should create a deficit, and eat that amount for a month.
After a month, see how much you've lost compared to how much you've wanted to eat. Lost too much? Eat more. Lost too little? Eat less.
Trial and error.
Over a period of time, you should have it all figured out. No need for all these little things that just make you spend more and more of your hard-earned money. On top of that: What do you do if you lose it or break it? You've grown a dependency on this silly little gadget, so you're going to have to go spend more money on it.
Stop using materialistic gadgets and start using your brain.
I suppose you take the exact same steps, move the exact same way, and do the exact same things month after month. Awesome.
Now get off that materialistic computer and start using your brain.0 -
chivalryder wrote: »Personally, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that uses formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn.
Instead, I would use something that requires no tools but a way to log your caloric intake. Pic a number of calories to eat that should create a deficit, and eat that amount for a month.
After a month, see how much you've lost compared to how much you've wanted to eat. Lost too much? Eat more. Lost too little? Eat less.
Trial and error.
Over a period of time, you should have it all figured out. No need for all these little things that just make you spend more and more of your hard-earned money. On top of that: What do you do if you lose it or break it? You've grown a dependency on this silly little gadget, so you're going to have to go spend more money on it.
Stop using materialistic gadgets and start using your brain.
I suppose you take the exact same steps, move the exact same way, and do the exact same things month after month. Awesome.
Now get off that materialistic computer and start using your brain.
Someone clearly didn't do their research.
Ever heard of TDEE? You might want to look it up.0 -
loridebacker wrote: »How do I use pedometer mode only?
Sorry I meant I have a fitbit flex / zip and not the new HRM wearable
because the bit I simply don't believe is 'this is your HR hence this is a somewhat accurate estimate of your calorie burn this day' .. because it simply doesn't work like that .. and I've yet to be convinced it can
HRMs convert to calories relatively accurately (still an estimate) for steady state cardio only0 -
loridebacker wrote: »How do I use pedometer mode only?
Sorry I meant I have a fitbit flex / zip and not the new HRM wearable
because the bit I simply don't believe is 'this is your HR hence this is a somewhat accurate estimate of your calorie burn this day' .. because it simply doesn't work like that .. and I've yet to be convinced it can
HRMs convert to calories relatively accurately (still an estimate) for steady state cardio only
I would like to add not just steady state, because a stroll in the park is steady state. Steady state, aerobic cardio activity. In other words, you're working hard enough to sweat, but you're not killing yourself.0 -
Well this went south rather quickly. (sits back and gets out the unsalted, unbuttered popcorn).0
-
Monkey_Business wrote: »Well this went south rather quickly. (sits back and gets out the unsalted, unbuttered popcorn).
You should add some 'No Salt Added' seasoning and maybe some chili powder. Oh boy, is that yummy!0 -
chivalryder wrote: »chivalryder wrote: »Personally, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that uses formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn.
Instead, I would use something that requires no tools but a way to log your caloric intake. Pic a number of calories to eat that should create a deficit, and eat that amount for a month.
After a month, see how much you've lost compared to how much you've wanted to eat. Lost too much? Eat more. Lost too little? Eat less.
Trial and error.
Over a period of time, you should have it all figured out. No need for all these little things that just make you spend more and more of your hard-earned money. On top of that: What do you do if you lose it or break it? You've grown a dependency on this silly little gadget, so you're going to have to go spend more money on it.
Stop using materialistic gadgets and start using your brain.
I suppose you take the exact same steps, move the exact same way, and do the exact same things month after month. Awesome.
Now get off that materialistic computer and start using your brain.
Someone clearly didn't do their research.
Ever heard of TDEE? You might want to look it up.
Wait, I thought you didn't trust anything that used formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn?
0 -
chivalryder wrote: »chivalryder wrote: »Personally, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that uses formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn.
Instead, I would use something that requires no tools but a way to log your caloric intake. Pic a number of calories to eat that should create a deficit, and eat that amount for a month.
After a month, see how much you've lost compared to how much you've wanted to eat. Lost too much? Eat more. Lost too little? Eat less.
Trial and error.
Over a period of time, you should have it all figured out. No need for all these little things that just make you spend more and more of your hard-earned money. On top of that: What do you do if you lose it or break it? You've grown a dependency on this silly little gadget, so you're going to have to go spend more money on it.
Stop using materialistic gadgets and start using your brain.
I suppose you take the exact same steps, move the exact same way, and do the exact same things month after month. Awesome.
Now get off that materialistic computer and start using your brain.
Someone clearly didn't do their research.
Ever heard of TDEE? You might want to look it up.
Wait, I thought you didn't trust anything that used formulas and algorithms to calculate your calorie burn?
I'll take two approaches to this:
a) As I said, you need to start somewhere. Pulling a number out of the air won't do you any good. Using TDEE is a good place to start, but it is just an estimate. You shouldn't use the number as if it were God. Start with it, eat that amount, see if you've achieved your goals for the month, adjust and keep going. Lather, rinse, repeat.
ETA: TDEE is not *actually* a formula, but a theory. People have created a formula so you can calculate an estimate for the theory. TDEE is simply what you burn in a day. What I mentioned in the above paragraph is you can use the formula to calculate an estimate on what your TDEE might be. The trial-and-error system I spoke of earlier is the only way to truly find what your real TDEE is, though is is subject to change as you increase/decrease your weight and your level of activity throughout the seasons.
But then, that's the magic of it all. You're constantly changing yourself, but you're also monitoring how your diet affects your weight. Therefore, you're constantly making adjustments to everything.
After a while, you'll have a solid idea of how much you need to eat based on how active you are. You wouldn't need a gadget to do it for you, you don't even need to think much about it. You'll slowly get a better understanding until it becomes second nature.
That being said, it would still be a good idea to log, because guessing calorie intake never works.
/ETA
See, if you thought about it, you could have figured that out for yourself.
b) Stop fracking trolling.0 -
I have a FitBit Charge HR, and my total calories at the end of the day are between 1500-1800, which is what my estimated TDEE is. When Sync'd to MFP, it gives you less than what you see on the device based on your MFP weight loss goal. The Fitibit gave me around 1800 yesterday, but MFP around 1500.0
-
I have the One - so not sure how it compares in terms of accuracy to the model you have. But now that I'm in maintenance I've learned that if I eat less than what Fitbit says I've burned, I lose weight. So its accurate or it lowballs me. You won't know your results/accuracy until you accumulate some data. So for now assume a 10% error rate if that gives you peace of mind. So 3100 * .9 (10% error rate) = 2800 roughly. Just plan on leaving some Fitbit calories 'on the table' and see how your rate of weight loss proceeds over the next few months. Then adjust accordingly.
Ps-I'm smaller, 125-128ish and for a moderately active day on Monday (8 hours of desk time) and 118 active minutes, 17k steps, total daily burn was 2076. So since you were more active in terms of # of steps & on your feet rather than sitting at a desk, and 40 pounds heavier, I don't find your calorie burned # to be odd.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions