Help, I stopped losing! Too many carbs?

Jiveli85
Jiveli85 Posts: 37 Member
edited November 18 in Health and Weight Loss
I have lost 25 lbs so far but with 5 more to go my weight has not budged in two weeks. I'm weighing everything and taking in about 1000-1200 calories per day, I'm 5'3. I don't eat back exercise calories (400 per day). My diet is within the calories allowance but I usually go over my recommended carb intake. Could the carbs be the issue? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
«1

Replies

  • abetterluke
    abetterluke Posts: 625 Member
    Fairly certain if you're 5'3'' and eating 1000-1200 cals per day and burning 400 per day which are not eating back you are bordering malnutrition.
  • This content has been removed.
  • 3bambi3
    3bambi3 Posts: 1,650 Member
    Do you weigh you food? All of it? And measure your liquids?

    Where did you come up with that calorie goal?

    Also, weight loss isn't linear. It's normal to stall.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    Perhaps you should rethink your goals here. I mean, really if you were eating that little you'd be losing. Mentally, you should know that you really need to eat more. But I think if you're not losing, you are eating more...which is good. Carbs have nothing to do with it.

    Do you really log and weigh everything? All your oil, drinks, condiments?
  • Jiveli85
    Jiveli85 Posts: 37 Member
    MFP
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    Do you weigh you food? All of it? And measure your liquids?

    Where did you come up with that calorie goal?

    Also, weight loss isn't linear. It's normal to stall.

    I don't weigh everything. Don't measure liquids. MFP gave recommended 1200/day.

  • Jiveli85
    Jiveli85 Posts: 37 Member
    arditarose wrote: »
    Perhaps you should rethink your goals here. I mean, really if you were eating that little you'd be losing. Mentally, you should know that you really need to eat more. But I think if you're not losing, you are eating more...which is good. Carbs have nothing to do with it.

    Do you really log and weigh everything? All your oil, drinks, condiments?

    I must be eating more without knowing it or else I would see some movement on the scale I guess.
  • abetterluke
    abetterluke Posts: 625 Member
    Jiveli85 wrote: »
    MFP
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    Do you weigh you food? All of it? And measure your liquids?

    Where did you come up with that calorie goal?

    Also, weight loss isn't linear. It's normal to stall.

    I don't weigh everything. Don't measure liquids. MFP gave recommended 1200/day.

    1200/day is low for most people but without knowing your height/weight/etc. I'd say its possible that's an ok goal. What is not an ok goal however is 600-800 net calories. You will do damage to yourself most likely.
  • 3bambi3
    3bambi3 Posts: 1,650 Member
    Jiveli85 wrote: »
    MFP
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    Do you weigh you food? All of it? And measure your liquids?

    Where did you come up with that calorie goal?

    Also, weight loss isn't linear. It's normal to stall.

    I don't weigh everything. Don't measure liquids. MFP gave recommended 1200/day.

    If you aren't weighing and measuring, you are likely eating more than you think.

    If you were really eating 600 net calories a day, no way you wouldn't be losing weight.
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    Jiveli85 wrote: »
    MFP
    3bambi3 wrote: »
    Do you weigh you food? All of it? And measure your liquids?

    Where did you come up with that calorie goal?

    Also, weight loss isn't linear. It's normal to stall.

    I don't weigh everything. Don't measure liquids. MFP gave recommended 1200/day.

    Definitely start doing those. With five pounds to lose, you have to be extremely precise in your logging.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    OP, what are your stats? Height/weight/activity level?
  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    If by "too many carbs" you mean "too many calories" .... sure - that's your problem.
  • Jiveli85
    Jiveli85 Posts: 37 Member
    I'm 5'3 119
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    Jiveli85 wrote: »
    I'm 5'3 119

    So you're at a healthy weight for your height. 114 brings you down to about the lowest healthy weight for you...is that your goal?
  • This content has been removed.
  • atypicalsmith
    atypicalsmith Posts: 2,742 Member
    OP, don't worry about it. Start maintenance. You're only five pounds away, and instead of focusing on that, focus on keeping what you have already lost off. A lot of times when people start maintenance, they magically lose the rest of the last five pounds. Good luck to you.
  • ahoy_m8
    ahoy_m8 Posts: 3,053 Member
    edited May 2015
    Congrats on progress so far! Good advice here. I'll add that a 2 week stall is normal. A lot of people (especially women) stall for 3 weeks then --whoosh-- 3 pounds gone in a couple days. I do wonder if the whoosh effect is more pronounced in those with lower BF% (closer to goal), but I haven't seen anything scientific on this, or even any unscientific conjecture. The people who do have that whoosh pattern to their weight loss generally average something pretty close to their goal (e.g. stall+whoosh averaging 1lb/wk). Stick with it. You will get there. http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/of-whooshes-and-squishy-fat.html/

    ETA: If you start reverse dieting, as atypicalsmith suggests, you will continue to lose weight until you hit maintenance.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    edited May 2015
    If you were logging properly you would be losing but weight loss isn't linear so you may still have stalls
    - read the calorie counting 101 stickie at the top

    If you were logging properly and using MFP properly you would be eating back exercise calories
    - failure to do so means you would be following a diet of malnutrition, risk major health conditions and ripping through your muscle at a far higher rate than you need to leading to bad physical results

    Should you be losing more weight at your height and weight
    - it's a valid question
  • SnuggleSmacks
    SnuggleSmacks Posts: 3,731 Member
    Could you please open your diary so that we can view it? It's difficult to give advice when we don't know what you're eating.

    I can say for sure though that it has nothing to do with carbs. If you're not losing, then either you're eating more than you think you are, or you aren't burning as many calories as you think you are. The latter could be caused by a medical issue, so it's important to try to figure out what's going on.

    Meanwhile, if you could please open your diary, we'll be glad to have a look.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 25,692 Member
    edited May 2015
    Jiveli85 wrote: »
    I have lost 25 lbs so far but with 5 more to go my weight has not budged in two weeks. I'm weighing everything and taking in about 1000-1200 calories per day, I'm 5'3. I don't eat back exercise calories (400 per day). My diet is within the calories allowance but I usually go over my recommended carb intake. Could the carbs be the issue? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

    Be patient.

    I just went through a 2-week plateau, and now I'm losing again. Maybe increase the amount of exercise you do. I walked 5 km more than usual this past week ... perhaps that's what triggered the loss at long last. Or maybe that's just the way that weight loss goes sometimes.



  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    If you were logging properly you would be losing but weight loss isn't linear so you may still have stalls
    - read the calorie counting 101 stickie at the top

    If you were logging properly and using MFP properly you would be eating back exercise calories
    - failure to do so means you would be following a diet of malnutrition, risk major health conditions and ripping through your muscle at a far higher rate than you need to leading to bad physical results

    Should you be losing more weight at your height and weight
    - it's a valid question

    This
  • twiigo
    twiigo Posts: 39 Member
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutrionals goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.
  • elphie754
    elphie754 Posts: 7,574 Member
    twiigo wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutrionals goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    No! Completely false!
  • This content has been removed.
  • forgtmenot
    forgtmenot Posts: 860 Member
    twiigo wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutritional goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    Starvation mode exists, but it does not exist in the way most people explain it. Starvation mode happens when your body has exhausted its last reserves of non-essential body fat and it starts to burn lean body mass (muscle and vital organs) at a high rate. It is not something that happens due to a couple weeks of not eating enough, it happens when the body has been starved for a significant period of time. It also does not mean the body completely stops losing weight, if that were true no one would ever starve to death and anorexics wouldn't be skinny, it just means that the rate at which one loses slows down, but this doesn't happen until a person is at something like 5-6% body fat and has no non essential body fat left to use for energy. So unless the OP is already extremely underweight, I highly doubt they are in "starvation mode".

    If you stop losing for a short period of time, don't worry. Weight loss is not linear and comes in peaks and valleys. It does not mean you did anything wrong, it may just come off in a few days. If it has been a significant amount of time where no loss has occured, there is something going on with your CI vs CO. Either you are overestimating your burns or you're underestimating your intake. Period.
  • Orphia
    Orphia Posts: 7,097 Member
    forgtmenot wrote: »
    twiigo wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutritional goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    Starvation mode exists, but it does not exist in the way most people explain it. Starvation mode happens when your body has exhausted its last reserves of non-essential body fat and it starts to burn lean body mass (muscle and vital organs) at a high rate. It is not something that happens due to a couple weeks of not eating enough, it happens when the body has been starved for a significant period of time. It also does not mean the body completely stops losing weight, if that were true no one would ever starve to death and anorexics wouldn't be skinny, it just means that the rate at which one loses slows down, but this doesn't happen until a person is at something like 5-6% body fat and has no non essential body fat left to use for energy. So unless the OP is already extremely underweight, I highly doubt they are in "starvation mode".

    If you stop losing for a short period of time, don't worry. Weight loss is not linear and comes in peaks and valleys. It does not mean you did anything wrong, it may just come off in a few days. If it has been a significant amount of time where no loss has occured, there is something going on with your CI vs CO. Either you are overestimating your burns or you're underestimating your intake. Period.

    Wow. I've been here about a month, and you are one of the coolest people I've noticed. Thanks for that post, and for your other contributions lately. I'm learning a lot from you. (Also @rabbitjb and @segacs )
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Orphia wrote: »
    forgtmenot wrote: »
    twiigo wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutritional goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    Starvation mode exists, but it does not exist in the way most people explain it. Starvation mode happens when your body has exhausted its last reserves of non-essential body fat and it starts to burn lean body mass (muscle and vital organs) at a high rate. It is not something that happens due to a couple weeks of not eating enough, it happens when the body has been starved for a significant period of time. It also does not mean the body completely stops losing weight, if that were true no one would ever starve to death and anorexics wouldn't be skinny, it just means that the rate at which one loses slows down, but this doesn't happen until a person is at something like 5-6% body fat and has no non essential body fat left to use for energy. So unless the OP is already extremely underweight, I highly doubt they are in "starvation mode".

    If you stop losing for a short period of time, don't worry. Weight loss is not linear and comes in peaks and valleys. It does not mean you did anything wrong, it may just come off in a few days. If it has been a significant amount of time where no loss has occured, there is something going on with your CI vs CO. Either you are overestimating your burns or you're underestimating your intake. Period.

    Wow. I've been here about a month, and you are one of the coolest people I've noticed. Thanks for that post, and for your other contributions lately. I'm learning a lot from you. (Also @rabbitjb and @segacs )

    @orphia wow thank you, that was unexpectedly pleasant ...when I first started visiting the forums I learnt an awful lot very quickly too, and I continue to learn...there is so much knowledge here posted to the boards. I particularly admire the blunter posters who back up their posts with current scientific research, helps eliminate the woo :)
  • SergeantSausage
    SergeantSausage Posts: 1,673 Member
    elphie754 wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutrionals goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    Ignore this Horse Hockey up there ^^^



  • biodigit
    biodigit Posts: 145 Member
    OP, how are you arriving at the figure of burning 400 cals via exercising?

    You're already at an optimal weight for your height. I think you're over worrying about something that shouldn't really be a big concern.
  • Orphia
    Orphia Posts: 7,097 Member
    edited May 2015
    Orphia wrote: »
    forgtmenot wrote: »
    twiigo wrote: »
    If not enough calories are consumed the body eventually goes into starvation mode and starts storing everything consumed, especially carbs. Your daily nutritional goals are as important as calorie goals. The body is like a vehicle, neglect any working parts and it will eventually not start.

    Starvation mode exists, but it does not exist in the way most people explain it. Starvation mode happens when your body has exhausted its last reserves of non-essential body fat and it starts to burn lean body mass (muscle and vital organs) at a high rate. It is not something that happens due to a couple weeks of not eating enough, it happens when the body has been starved for a significant period of time. It also does not mean the body completely stops losing weight, if that were true no one would ever starve to death and anorexics wouldn't be skinny, it just means that the rate at which one loses slows down, but this doesn't happen until a person is at something like 5-6% body fat and has no non essential body fat left to use for energy. So unless the OP is already extremely underweight, I highly doubt they are in "starvation mode".

    If you stop losing for a short period of time, don't worry. Weight loss is not linear and comes in peaks and valleys. It does not mean you did anything wrong, it may just come off in a few days. If it has been a significant amount of time where no loss has occured, there is something going on with your CI vs CO. Either you are overestimating your burns or you're underestimating your intake. Period.

    Wow. I've been here about a month, and you are one of the coolest people I've noticed. Thanks for that post, and for your other contributions lately. I'm learning a lot from you. (Also @rabbitjb and @segacs )

    Heads up to @forgtmenot (Sorry, forgot to tag you.)

    Thanks heaps to rabbitjb and segacs!
This discussion has been closed.